Puppy Linux Discussion Forum

[orrin]

Min will not run in my Slacko 64-6.3.2

[mikeb]

Sounds like it wants an older or newer gtk.
The build from the min website wants newer gtk than one of the builds on here.

Suggestion...try a different build of min

I got it to run on lucid but that did require a gtk update.
... gtk 2400 ... but the min website build wanted newer than that.

mike

[peebee]

The latest version needs GTK+3.....

[orrin]

[mikeb]

The sfs I got from this thread of 1.7 was compiled to use gtk 2 so I assume its a build option though I used the 32 bit version I see no reason the 64 bit could not after all it will have exactly the same interface function calls.

mike

[orrin]

I got GTK+3-3.8.2 from the Puppy package manager. I assumed the package manager would properly install it.

Is there some action I must take to turn it on?

[Mike Walsh]

@ orrin:-

Just out of curiosity, where does pFind show your gtk-3.0 to be installed? Is it in /usr/lib64, or /usr/lib? For Slacko 64 6.3.2, it should in be /usr/lib64; the Slackos don't use the sym-link to /usr/lib that the 'buntu-based Pups have.

I have a feeling you'll also need gdk-3.0, as well..... Y'know, just out of curiosity, have you tried any of my current Chrome packages recently? All the libs & stuff required by Chrome are within a sub-directory inside /chrome; all self-contained nowadays.....


Mike.

[norgo]

I downloaded version 1.8.0 for testing
has somebody noticed that the min-1.8.0-amd64 package is using the /usr/lib path instead the /usr/lib64 ?

[mikeb]

Perhaps we need a volunteer to make a consistent puppy friendly build.

I never did find out who built the sfs that I run on Lucid.

mike

[orrin]

[jplt_bis]

I'am wrting this message from the deb min from their github on uppupcc 18.10 :

: https://github.com/minbrowser/min/releases/download/v1.8.0-beta1/min_1.8.0-beta1_i386.deb

Work great.

[greengeek]

When I use Chrome and view a Murga forum post I can right click on the icon at the top of a post and save the link (to identify the exact specific post).

However when I do this in Min it only gives me the address of the icon - not the unique address of the post.

Any suggestions how I can identify the unique url of a specific post using Min?

[8Geee]

g/g

Not a Min user but your problem looks like

a.) The browser cannot/doesnot use a 'gif' as a link
b.) Following that, can it link using jpg or png?, text-link only?

May be a setting in the browser to adjust this.

Regards
8Geee

[greengeek]

The strange thing is - it can link from the gif ok (clicking it takes me to a specific post). Min obviously knows what the link is pointing too, but just won't tell me what that is when I rightclick it.

Just an oversight i guess.

Another related question though: where does Min display the url of the page you are currently viewing? Sometimes I want to be able to copy that url and view it in another browser or save it to a document - but how?

[peebee]

Looks like min has become 64-bit only on Linux from version 1.10.0

1.9.2 is last i386 version

https://electronjs.org/blog/linux-32bit-support