| Author |
Message |
PaulBx1
Joined: 16 Jun 2006 Posts: 2308 Location: Wyoming, USA
|
Posted: Fri 25 Jan 2008, 01:13 Post subject:
216 Discrepancy between gdmap and freememapplet |
|
I have a 512MB pupsave and boot off floppy with the pupsave on the hard drive.
Freememapplet says I have 199MB left.
When I open /initrd/pup_rw (which I believe my pupsave via /dev/loop1) in gdmap, the figure at the upper right above the graphical display says "274.2 MiB". I assume that is saying there are files amounting to 274MB in my pupsave.
Well, if you add 274MB used, to 199MB left, you get 473MB total, 39MB short of the pupsave size of 512MB. What happened to those 39MB? Is there more stuff in my pupsave than what is in /initrd/pup_rw?
I tried to find docs on gdmap, to be sure that figure above the display means what I think it does, but there are no docs on sourceforge. Or at least I didn't find them.
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Flash
Official Dog Handler

Joined: 04 May 2005 Posts: 9911 Location: Arizona USA
|
Posted: Fri 25 Jan 2008, 22:04 Post subject:
|
|
I've never been able to make sense of gdmap or freememapplet. Some of the discrepancy you report could be due to video memory, but not that much. What does "free" report? (When you run it from a console.)
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
PaulBx1
Joined: 16 Jun 2006 Posts: 2308 Location: Wyoming, USA
|
Posted: Sat 26 Jan 2008, 01:37 Post subject:
|
|
| Code: | ~ >free
total used free shared buffers
Mem: 320844 305296 15548 0 26672
Swap: 0 0 0
Total: 320844 305296 15548
~ >
|
Not sure what that has to do with it. I am talking about the pupsave...
Well, I guess this is not that important. If I get really irritated I might dig into gdmap and freememapplet and see how they are determining these numbers.
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
trapster

Joined: 28 Nov 2005 Posts: 1966 Location: Maine, USA
|
Posted: Sun 27 Jan 2008, 08:11 Post subject:
|
|
#df -m will probably confuse matters more??
| Code: |
# df -m
Filesystem 1M-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/hda2 9561 8643 918 90% /initrd/mnt/dev_save
/dev/loop1 620 328 292 53% /initrd/pup_rw
tmpfs 78 77 1 99% /initrd/mnt/tmpfs
/dev/loop0 77 77 0 100% /initrd/pup_ro2
/dev/loop3 66 66 0 100% /initrd/pup_ro3
/dev/loop4 60 60 0 100% /initrd/pup_ro4
/dev/loop5 16 16 0 100% /initrd/pup_ro5
unionfs 838 546 292 65% /
tmpfs 159 0 159 0% /tmp
shmfs 1 0 1 0% /dev/shm
|
_________________ trapster
Maine, USA
Asus eeepc 1005HA PU1X-BK
Frugal install:Puppeee4.31 + 1.0, Puppy4.10 + Lupu52
Currently using Puppeee-1.0 AND lupu52 w/ fluxbox
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
PaulBx1
Joined: 16 Jun 2006 Posts: 2308 Location: Wyoming, USA
|
Posted: Sun 27 Jan 2008, 14:22 Post subject:
|
|
| Code: | ~ >df -m
Filesystem 1M-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/root 2 1 1 55% /initrd
/dev/hda1 19060 8786 10274 46% /initrd/mnt/dev_save
/dev/loop0 70 70 0 100% /initrd/pup_ro2
/dev/loop1 496 278 192 59% /initrd/pup_rw
unionfs 566 348 192 64% /
~ >
|
It says 278MB used. Note, df says I have a total of only 496MB, not 512MB. Maybe the rest is filesystem overhead?
At this point gdmap says I have 274.2MB used.
Partview says I have 278MB used and 192MB free (for a total of 470MB!)
Freememapplet agrees I have only 192MB free.
I just don't like this feeling I am not getting my advertised 512MB. 40MB of overhead sounds like an awful lot.
I wonder if some of these are reading in 1024*1024 bytes, and others in 1000*1000 bytes. The latter should be banished from the world of computers!
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
|