Puppy Linux Discussion Forum

muggins · Joined: 20 Jan 2006 Posts: 6660 Location: lisbon

Here's a small ide...unfortunately not much information...not sure of current status:

http://lxrad.sourceforge.net/phpmysb-0.2.1/html/dinamycsite/viewer.php?/index.html

BarryK · Posted: Fri 23 May 2008, 05:48 Post subject:

muggins, you're a champ! That's a great discovery. See my blog post, and PET's to download:

http://puppylinux.com/blog/?viewDetailed=00114

Viking Sailor · Joined: 14 Mar 2008 Posts: 4

Berry,

Here is another site with more info on LXRAD including the author's name and email.

http://freshmeat.net/projects/lxrad/

Paul

kirk · Joined: 11 Nov 2005 Posts: 1333 Location: florida

Here's another IDE that was posted on the forum:

http://www.murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?t=27684&start=15

It's less than 4MB uncompressed without the docs (which are about 8MB and look very nice ) and is cross platform.

boscobearbank · Joined: 06 Apr 2006 Posts: 63 Location: MN

Wosh · Joined: 09 Jul 2007 Posts: 60 Location: Nuremberg Germany

@ All Puppy Developers

I have fixed the Anjuta bugs and created an Anjuta-SFS file. But there is still one problem that prevents it's release. In current Puppy 4.00 anjuta-2.4.2-p400.sfs is mounted before pup_400.sfs.

Anjuta depends on a lot of library-versions from glib to gtk+ that have not made it into Puppy yet. So it is necessary to mount Anjuta as last SFS-File to activate the new library versions. I have searched /etc to find out where pup_400.sfs and the other sfs-files are mounted. No clue. Help neded.

The alternative would be to build pets from all new libraries and install them first. Very cumbersome!

raffy · Joined: 25 May 2005 Posts: 4636 Location: Manila

Are sfs files mounted alphabetically? But I guess that does not count the pup_xxx.sfs. The process can be verified from /initrd/sbin/init (this is in 2.13).

Wosh · Joined: 09 Jul 2007 Posts: 60 Location: Nuremberg Germany

@ raffy
In Puppy 400 init is a link to busybox in /initrd/pup_ro2/sbin. Does it really mount the sfs-files?

The sfs-files really are mounted in reverse alphabetical order.
To ensure anjuta to be mounted last I maybe should rename it aaaaaaaaanjuta-2.4.2-p400.sfs. Wink

But pup_xxx.sfs is always mounted at last.

@ all
The sfs load order needs a fix. My suggestion is to take the boot manager order selected by the user. The boot manager also should include a non removable pup_xxx.sfs that only can be moved up down within the sfs load order. So my problem could be solved easily. But these are dreams of the future.

The problem could be solved more smartly by another solution I am thinking about But it would need support of the Puppy-Linux core team. I call it

Pupdater

Pupdater creates an updated pup_xxx.sfs with the newest version of packages loaded from a repository that holds updated package versions uploaded by trusted puppy developers.

In my case I would have uploaded all updated versions, run pupdater to create an updated pup_xxx.sfs. That's it. No need to change the boot order.
How about that?

PS
I thought I little bit deeper about pupdater. It also could be a good tool to create user adapted puppies without the need to rebuild Puppy via unleashed. No more derivatives needed. Hi folks, have you already thought what you would do with your obtained leisure time? Wink

raffy · Joined: 25 May 2005 Posts: 4636 Location: Manila

Maybe this new sfs issue needs its own thread?

Coilean · Joined: 26 May 2008 Posts: 10 Location: Ireland

I'm way out of my depth here, but I reckon it;'s the best way to learn.
I'm a puppy user for a couple of hours, and linux for only a little bit longer, so bear with me. I'm trying hard to break free from windows......

I' started on woshs anjuta procedure to install, but fell at the first hurdle.
I downloaded the libxml package and got errors on the make command

I don't know how to cut and paste from the command prompt, but i'm getting an error along the lines of 'automake-1.10 is missing on your system' and missing --run autoconf aclocal.m4:14

Any suggestions on how to continue?

Wosh · Joined: 09 Jul 2007 Posts: 60 Location: Nuremberg Germany

@ Coilean

Please do not use the old Anjuta 2.4.1 build procedure any more. It created a buggy Anjuta IDE. I have replaced it with the bug free Anjuta 2.4.2 build procedure. It will take you about 4 hours to build anjuta from the scratch.

If you can't expect the SFS-File release you can download it from:
http://www.murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?mode=attach&id=10123&sid=f1bf0c178ec649db780d3e9c627bd7b1

Just for you I have added a description how to activate the development package.

Cheers

L'Elfe · Joined: 07 Oct 2008 Posts: 10

Helo

I have installed code blocks on puppy 400 it's working , but i have this strange message when compiling and runing a simple console "hello world" into the EDI waht does that mean ? :

/usr/local/bin/cb_console_runner: /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6: no version information available (required by /usr/local/bin/cb_console_runner)
/usr/local/bin/cb_console_runner: /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6: no version information available (required by /usr/local/bin/cb_console_runner)
Hello world!
Press ENTER to continue.

Thanks

BarryK · Posted: Fri 17 Oct 2008, 19:09 Post subject:

L'Elfe · Joined: 07 Oct 2008 Posts: 10

Yes i downloaded the cb_400.sfs done by tmpMichigan , and the link given by Mu in the previous page.

do you have a version for the devx_400.sfs ? that works better ?

is it difficult to compile codeblocks in puppy , i am a newbie in linux ?

Thanks