heh heh, this is what we have used so far:
Storage: 2.61MB (limit 7513MB)
bandwidth: 0.38GB (monthly limit 330GB)
Usage report on new host, servage.net
Usage
That will increase quickly in the next 2 months.
By then we could be operating a portal-type of site. If you can make available a database for this, then testing can be started. Info required will be:
databasename
hostname - localhost (usually)
username - user assigned to the database, with all privileges
password
For the coming week, I will do testing of PHP scripts only (no database). Focus of attention will be the menu system.
EDIT: Puppian already has two simple CMS for testing - see his post.
Hope everyone will have their links updated by November 7, as we hope puppylinux.org will be up in searches by that time.
Cheers!
By then we could be operating a portal-type of site. If you can make available a database for this, then testing can be started. Info required will be:
databasename
hostname - localhost (usually)
username - user assigned to the database, with all privileges
password
For the coming week, I will do testing of PHP scripts only (no database). Focus of attention will be the menu system.
EDIT: Puppian already has two simple CMS for testing - see his post.
Hope everyone will have their links updated by November 7, as we hope puppylinux.org will be up in searches by that time.
Cheers!
Last edited by raffy on Tue 01 Nov 2005, 02:27, edited 1 time in total.
Dead Links
I did a search of old Puppy ISOs a while ago and stumbled upon dead links that start with
puppylinux.org
something like puppylinux.org/dforum, puppylinux.org/puppy. The subdirectories must be old, as even simple forum links were there.
Is this an effect of URL rewriting at goosee.com? Whatever it is, it needs to be corrected soon as searchers can get the wrong impression about the new site.
puppylinux.org
something like puppylinux.org/dforum, puppylinux.org/puppy. The subdirectories must be old, as even simple forum links were there.
Is this an effect of URL rewriting at goosee.com? Whatever it is, it needs to be corrected soon as searchers can get the wrong impression about the new site.