The time now is Sun 26 May 2013, 03:59
All times are UTC - 4 |
| Author |
Message |
Aitch

Joined: 04 Apr 2007 Posts: 6825 Location: Chatham, Kent, UK
|
Posted: Tue 07 Oct 2008, 18:37 Post subject:
|
|
Is this any use?
http://www.pokylinux.org/
Aitch
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Aitch

Joined: 04 Apr 2007 Posts: 6825 Location: Chatham, Kent, UK
|
Posted: Tue 07 Oct 2008, 19:20 Post subject:
|
|
| MU wrote: | yes aitch, that was what I mentioned, the attempt to run apt-get in Puppy.
An approach, but we never got a working version, or even a testversion. |
so what's this, mark?
http://www.murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?t=28994
ttuuxxx & amigo seem to have it working
or is there something else?
Aitch
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
MU

Joined: 24 Aug 2005 Posts: 13642 Location: Karlsruhe, Germany
|
Posted: Tue 07 Oct 2008, 19:31 Post subject:
|
|
no, undeb is very old (and usefull).
But it just extracts a deb, nothing more.
Like unzip.
But a Packagemanager/installer like apt-get is much more complex.
undeb can be the base for extended utilities.
I used it in pb-debianinstaller, and it could be used for a deb2tgz utility.
But some more things are required.
E.g. Puppy does not support, I think it was /etc/libexec.
Here debian stores symbolic links to programs.
I don't exactly remember it, but I had to add a function to deal with that in the pb-debianinstaller.
Other issues are, that older debs have their own menu system, not based on xdg. This also had to be adressed.
Mark
_________________ my recommended links
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Aitch

Joined: 04 Apr 2007 Posts: 6825 Location: Chatham, Kent, UK
|
Posted: Tue 07 Oct 2008, 19:47 Post subject:
|
|
just found
http://www.mombu.com/gnu_linux/slackware/t-difference-between-slapt-swaret-pkgtool-1248533.html
| Quote: | Difference between slapt : swaret : pkgtool?
Hello
I suppose there will always be the hard console camp vs the gooey camp
and hopefully I fall somewhere in between where I attempt to use tools
appropriate to the job. In the case of packages, which I almost never use
directly since I compile from source and have "checkinstall" create a
package. Having been asked "why bother to effectively do both when you
could just do one" this thread seems a good place to answer.
If one installs with "make install" there is no package involved. By
using "checkinstall" which installs from source and then essentially
re-installs as a package, all packaging tools are available for every so
installed application. I've not used swaret but AFAIK it is essentially a
dpkg clone for slack. While debian's dpkg is IMHO vastly superior to RPM
( so swaret might be at least useful in Slack for those unconcerned with
the details of installing applications ) whatever tools you use, pkgtool,
rpm, etc *all* of them can be organized in KDE's KPackage. Here I'll
point out that if all I want to do involves a single package then pkgtool
is just fine, but when someone wishes to deal with many packages at once,
the gooey tool KPackage is very useful, especially to those who prefer GUI
but even to those such as I who use both. In KPackage, one can view what
is installed, what is available ( updated from whatever mirror you like )
search for either installed or newly avilable packages and even see a file
list of all the files and their paths. Because KPackage works with all
package tools it is especially useful to those who run more than one
distro or who may have for example Slack at home and Red Hat, SuSe. or
whatever at work or at a friends. Thus KPackage can bring a consistency to
any linux as well as operate as a "homebase" center when dealing with
large numbers of packages.
So it might be worthwhile for people new to Slack to learn pkgtool while
keeping KPackage open to see the "big picture" and help make sense of
what's really going on, and get a feel for when CLI is sufficient and when
it is best to resort to a GUI tool.
Jimmy |
HTH
PS judging from this....
http://www.justlinux.com/forum/showthread.php?threadid=142905
apt-get isn't all it's cracked up to be IMHO
Aitch
Last edited by Aitch on Tue 07 Oct 2008, 20:00; edited 1 time in total
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
changturkey
Joined: 29 Dec 2007 Posts: 67
|
Posted: Tue 07 Oct 2008, 19:48 Post subject:
|
|
So if Puppy 5 can't be Debian based, what about Zenwalk/Arch?
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
big_bass

Joined: 13 Aug 2007 Posts: 1736
|
Posted: Fri 10 Oct 2008, 12:07 Post subject:
puppy on slackware ??? yep it can be done |
|
(I patched and recompiled the slackware kernel )
and now I have puppy mounted and running in slackware 12.1
now puppy runs on a slackware install
now thats a twist
btw thats unipup
running the hardware info tool in puppy (on a slackware machine )
yes its running and no virtual magic either
also has smp support
here is a screen shot
I am having too much fun today
puppy on my slack box slackware 12.1 running the latest unipup that puts an end to package incompatibility
for puppy versions
I also mounted and ran programs from puppy 2.16
I am testing more puppy versions
many programs run
*click on the picture to get a clear view of it
| Description |
|
| Filesize |
203.2 KB |
| Viewed |
568 Time(s) |

|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
raffy
Joined: 25 May 2005 Posts: 4636 Location: Manila
|
Posted: Sun 12 Oct 2008, 21:15 Post subject:
yay |
|
That's excellent! Will be eager to see your how-to.
In my experience, version 3+ runs slowly in Pentium II's. But version 2+ runs well, so am very much interested in your experiments, especially in the use of Slackware packages for Puppy version 2.16.
_________________ Puppy user since Oct 2004. Want FreeOffice? Get the sfs (English only).
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
raffy
Joined: 25 May 2005 Posts: 4636 Location: Manila
|
Posted: Wed 15 Oct 2008, 03:12 Post subject:
Discussion from Barry |
|
Barry's recent post has touched on Puppy 5.0: http://puppylinux.com/blog/?viewDetailed=00416
| Quote: | | Then there is the much-praised Slackware compatibility of 3.x. Well, someone can rebuild 4.1 with the latest Slackware packages if they want. It is a straightforward process, just very time consuming. 3.x is based on Slackware 12 packages, so is getting a bit long in the tooth. If someone wants to rebuild Unleashed 4.1 with the latest Slackware packages, then call it 5.0, why not? Go for it. |
I have suggested that big_bass leads the team. Hope you are available, big_bass. This is not a rush project, and you've already moved far ahead.
_________________ Puppy user since Oct 2004. Want FreeOffice? Get the sfs (English only).
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
MU

Joined: 24 Aug 2005 Posts: 13642 Location: Karlsruhe, Germany
|
Posted: Wed 15 Oct 2008, 03:37 Post subject:
|
|
you can download Muppy-build.
It has two subfolders, systemupdate and systemupdate-dev.
They include the extracted and in some cases slightly modified packages from Slackware 12.1 that I used to create the base Muppy.
You would overwrite Puppys files with them, and remove the older ones from Puppy.
These are included:
a52dec-0.7.4-i586-2gsb
__acl-2.2.47_1-i486-1
avidemux2_gtk-2.4.0
avidemux_nls-2.4.0
cairo-1.4.14-i486-1
cdrdao-1.2.1-i486-1
__coreutils
dbus-1.1.20-i486-1
dbus-glib-0.74-i486-2
dbus-qt3-0.70-i486-2
desktop-file-utils-0.14-i486-1
dvd+rw-tools-7.1-i486-1
faac-1.26-i586-2gsb
faad2-2.6.1-i586-2gsb
ffmpeg-svn_13024-i586-2gsb
flac-1.2.1-i486-1
__freetype-2.3.5-i486-1
gamin-0.1.9-i486-1
gcc-4.2.3-i486-1
gcc-g++-4.2.3-i486-1
__ghostscript-8.62-i486-5
__ghostscript-puppy
glib2-2.16.5-i586-1gsb
glibc-2.7-i486-10
glibc-profile-2.7-i486-10
glibc-solibs-2.7-i486-10
gmp-4.2.2-i486-1
gnome-icon-theme-2.22.0-noarch-1
gnutls-1.6.3-i486-1_slack12.0
gnutls-2.2.5-i486-1_slack12.1
gtk+2-2.12.9-i486-1
__gutenprint-5.0.2-i486-1
hal-0.5.10-i486-2
hal-info-20080317-noarch-1
__lcms-1.17-i486-1
libart_lgpl-2.3.20-i486-1
libcddb-1.3.0-i486-1
libgsf-1.14.8-i486-1
__libICE-1.0.4-i486-1-moved
__libidn-1.5-i486-1
__libjpeg-6b-i486-5
__libmng-1.0.10-i486-1
__libpng-1.2.27-i486-1
__libSM-1.0.3-i486-1-moved
libtool-1.5.24-i486-1
__libX11-1.1.4-i486-1-moved
__libXcursor-1.1.9-i486-1-moved
__libXext-1.0.4-i486-1-moved
__libXft-2.1.12-i486-2-moved
__libXinerama-1.0.3-i486-1-moved
libxml2-2.6.31-i486-2
__libXmu-1.0.4-i486-1-moved
__libXrandr-1.2.2-i486-1-moved
__libXrender-0.9.4-i486-1-moved
libxslt-1.1.22-i486-1
__mesa-7.0.2-i486-1-moved
__ncurses
__openssl-0.9.8h-i486-1_slack12.1
pango-1.20.0-i486-1
__pcre-7.7-i486-1_slack12.1
pgrep
pixman-0.10.0-i486-4
__poppler-0.6.4-i486-1
__poppler1-old
popt-1.7-i486-2
__qt-3.3.8b-i486-2
udev-118-i486-3
x264-snapshot_20080430_2245-i586-1gsb
There are other folders with more libs, but you just need these.
You could even remove some of them, not everyone is explicitly needed.
Download:muppy008.4cbuild.tgz, development.tgz:
ftp://ks301128.kimsufi.com/Muppy0084/final/C/buildsystem/
Mark
_________________ my recommended links
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
WhoDo

Joined: 11 Jul 2006 Posts: 4441 Location: Lake Macquarie NSW Australia
|
Posted: Wed 15 Oct 2008, 04:04 Post subject:
Re: Discussion from Barry |
|
| raffy wrote: | I have suggested that big_bass leads the team. Hope you are available, big_bass. This is not a rush project, and you've already moved far ahead.  |
I'd second that, raffy. Quiet achievers are a rarity and big_ bass is certainly one of those. Go for it, b_b!
_________________ Actions speak louder than words ... and they usually work when words don't!
SIP:whodo@proxy01.sipphone.com; whodo@realsip.com
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Aitch

Joined: 04 Apr 2007 Posts: 6825 Location: Chatham, Kent, UK
|
Posted: Thu 16 Oct 2008, 16:52 Post subject:
|
|
"Go for it b_b"
2nd that, however I believe ttuuxxx is interested in working with you on this
more teamwork
Aitch
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
raffy
Joined: 25 May 2005 Posts: 4636 Location: Manila
|
Posted: Thu 16 Oct 2008, 19:24 Post subject:
ttuuxxx |
|
Yes, he has started a discussion.
_________________ Puppy user since Oct 2004. Want FreeOffice? Get the sfs (English only).
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
big_bass

Joined: 13 Aug 2007 Posts: 1736
|
Posted: Thu 16 Oct 2008, 22:30 Post subject:
Re: Discussion from Barry |
|
| raffy wrote: | Barry's recent post has touched on Puppy 5.0: http://puppylinux.com/blog/?viewDetailed=00416
| Quote: | | Then there is the much-praised Slackware compatibility of 3.x. Well, someone can rebuild 4.1 with the latest Slackware packages if they want. It is a straightforward process, just very time consuming. 3.x is based on Slackware 12 packages, so is getting a bit long in the tooth. If someone wants to rebuild Unleashed 4.1 with the latest Slackware packages, then call it 5.0, why not? Go for it. |
I have suggested that big_bass leads the team. Hope you are available, big_bass. This is not a rush project, and you've already moved far ahead.  |
| Quote: | WhoDo
I'd second that, raffy. Quiet achievers are a rarity and big_ bass is certainly one of those. Go for it, b_b! Razz |
Thanks guys .
That's a definite... I would like to help out.
And do what I already started to do.
if you guys and others like the results then ....?
Leading ? I only care about keeping puppy updated and more compatible
with other packages
Collectively there is much talent alone we fail
I spend too much time trying to make things work and learning new things
Count me in as a long term puppy supporter
And don't forget to put me on the the list
of team players
big_bass aka Joe A
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
raffy
Joined: 25 May 2005 Posts: 4636 Location: Manila
|
Posted: Fri 17 Oct 2008, 04:03 Post subject:
Re: team player |
|
| big_bass wrote: | I only care about keeping puppy updated and more compatible with other packages
Collectively there is much talent alone we fail
I spend too much time trying to make things work and learning new things
Count me in as a long term puppy supporter
And don't forget to put me on the the list
of team players |
Thanks, big_bass, your attitude (similar to many others') is wealth in this community.
_________________ Puppy user since Oct 2004. Want FreeOffice? Get the sfs (English only).
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
ttuuxxx

Joined: 05 May 2007 Posts: 10720 Location: Ontario Canada,Sydney Australia
|
Posted: Fri 17 Oct 2008, 05:10 Post subject:
|
|
Hi bigbass
I was talking to another developer and they basically said the best way to make "puppy 5.0 GTS" slackware version is basically, Install the latest Slackware 12.1 which I just downloaded 2.1 gigs worth. Then compile the needed applications which will take some time and then patch the kernel and install/try the default puppy only applications/scrpts and update the devx.
What I figured would work is build it without patching the kernel, install the packages, updated the devx and then hand it over to someone with kernel patching experience to patch it for maybe new small laptops, like eepc and acer-one and other puppy related patches, I'm sure a 2.1 gig distro isn't patched for these small computers, I could be wrong. But it wouldn't make sense due to the fact it wouldn't probably fit/run on them. ?
I don't own one so I don't have a clue.
How you think think it should be worked out?
I'm going to start compiling tomorrow when I get up.
ttuuxxx
_________________ http://audio.online-convert.com/ <-- excellent site
http://samples.mplayerhq.hu/A-codecs/ <-- Codec Test Files
http://html5games.com/ <-- excellent HTML5 games

|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|