| Author |
Message |
tom4jean

Joined: 02 Dec 2008 Posts: 16 Location: Valatie, N.Y. USA
|
Posted: Fri 26 Mar 2010, 00:29 Post subject:
[Solved] A [BAD] way to push up distrowatch numbers |
|
Here is an easy way to promote Puppylinux.
I noticed a number of people in the forums put a lot of emphasis on the Distrowatch.com list to gauge the popularity of Puppy. While I know it is only a gauge of how many clicks Puppy gets on their site and is not a true representation of puppy's use a suggestion I have is that anytime you want to get to these forums or Puppylinux.com start by going through Distrowatch.com clicking on the Puppy link in the right stat column and then follow the link to puppylinux.com from there, and then the forum link from Barry's site.
While I am sure they probably go by clicks from IP addresses and only allow one a day if everyone on this forum did that each time that they wanted to get to the forum I bet we could drive puppy's numbers up quite quickly., And with the amount of change I have seen recently on those numbers I suspect other distos are already doing something like that.
Rather then being dishonest this would actually make those numbers on Distrowatch more accurate by capturing the amount of people in these forums actually using Puppy.
_________________ AKA: tom4jesus; Running Quirky 1.0 on Compaq cq10 netbook
Search the Puppy Forums to find that elusive PET;
http://puppylinux.org/wikka/PuppyLinuxSearchEngine
Last edited by tom4jean on Sat 27 Mar 2010, 13:52; edited 2 times in total
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
nooby
Joined: 29 Jun 2008 Posts: 9387 Location: SwedenEurope
|
Posted: Fri 26 Mar 2010, 05:11 Post subject:
|
|
Yes let's do it.
_________________
I'm a noob so I use Google Search of Puppy Forum
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
01micko

Joined: 11 Oct 2008 Posts: 7019 Location: qld
|
Posted: Fri 26 Mar 2010, 07:36 Post subject:
|
|
Ho hum...
Stats is stats, can be bent any which way. Puppy is Puppy... .. who cares about stats?
_________________ keep the faith .. 
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
dejan555

Joined: 30 Nov 2008 Posts: 2407 Location: Montenegro
|
Posted: Fri 26 Mar 2010, 08:06 Post subject:
|
|
Stop the distrowatch madness you don't help puppy that way. These threads only put pressure on Barry and developers and rush things they usually wouldn't.
_________________

|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
technosaurus

Joined: 18 May 2008 Posts: 3843
|
Posted: Fri 26 Mar 2010, 16:40 Post subject:
|
|
Please don't - we don't need the negative publicity that PCLinuxOS got for doing this about a year ago.
_________________ Puppy Web Desktop Now with pet packages - Pet Packaging 100 & 101
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
dejan555

Joined: 30 Nov 2008 Posts: 2407 Location: Montenegro
|
Posted: Fri 26 Mar 2010, 16:59 Post subject:
|
|
Very true
_________________

|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
tom4jean

Joined: 02 Dec 2008 Posts: 16 Location: Valatie, N.Y. USA
|
Posted: Sat 27 Mar 2010, 13:50 Post subject:
|
|
| technosaurus wrote: | | Please don't - we don't need the negative publicity that PCLinuxOS got for doing this about a year ago. |
Sorry, I didn't realize that happened in the past. Puppy does not need that.
My suggestion was really based on the fact that I really don't think the distrowatch numbers at all reflect the true use of any distro, but over and and over they are unfairly referred to in reviews and by posters.
Lets call this a bad idea and [Solved] with a big NAY to the idea.
_________________ AKA: tom4jesus; Running Quirky 1.0 on Compaq cq10 netbook
Search the Puppy Forums to find that elusive PET;
http://puppylinux.org/wikka/PuppyLinuxSearchEngine
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
8-bit

Joined: 03 Apr 2007 Posts: 3012 Location: Oregon
|
Posted: Sat 27 Mar 2010, 14:17 Post subject:
|
|
I am sorry I brought the subject up.
Although I visit the DistroWatch site, I NEVER click on Puppy just to be clicking on it.
And you are right in that it is just a page hit rating and does not reflect the true popularity of a distro.
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
musher0

Joined: 04 Jan 2009 Posts: 2211 Location: Gatineau (Qc), Canada
|
Posted: Sat 27 Mar 2010, 15:24 Post subject:
|
|
| 8-bit wrote: | I am sorry I brought the subject up.
Although I visit the DistroWatch site, I NEVER click on Puppy just to be clicking on it.
And you are right in that it is just a page hit rating and does not reflect the true popularity of a distro. |
(My underline and emphasis.)
What does, then?
How else can we know how many people are actually using Puppy or a derivate?
The thing is, MS is using stats to control the market.
Also their system is set to send "panic" messages about people not having MS Office installed or some other of their products, but that is another subject.
Also they have tried to dish sole-provider contracts issued under a bizarre combination of jurisdictions that MS will keep "empty" to bring down any company that dares criticize them. Again, that's another subject. (They tried that on a co-op I was a member of, but we saw through the smoke screen.)
To come back to number of users. Let's keep in mind that some people are afraid to say they are not using the monopoly product all the time.
Are the numbers really (off the top of my head)
Linux: 2 %, MacIntosh: 2%, MS: 96 % ???
I doubt that very much.
How do you free people of the dominant and manipulated and serfdom mentality? Granted, boosting our stats on DistroWatch is not the way, and it is certainly a very incomplete approach in view of the general OS environment.
Any ideas, people?
_________________
"...l'industrie de l'informatique n'aura besoin que de très peu de temps pour ramener l'humanité aux dessins rupestres." (M. Goebbel, Order of the Command Line; [ma trad.])
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
|