| Author |
Message |
kirk
Joined: 11 Nov 2005 Posts: 1333 Location: florida
|
Posted: Tue 09 Nov 2010, 13:21 Post subject:
|
|
| Quote: | | - Apply the .pet to prevent white on yellow for PPM. |
That should be fixed in 510.
| Quote: | | - Warning about using Alsa sound wizard (It disabled my save file) |
The Alsa sound wizard has been removed from the menu.
| Quote: | | How to set up Firefox for use as non-spot |
In 510 if you click the FAQs link and then click "Firefox won't save to xxxx." you'll find your answer.
| Quote: | | - Any other stuff that a first time user should be aware of. |
Read all of the FAQs, there's not much to read. It should be very helpful to new users.
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Colonel Panic

Joined: 16 Sep 2006 Posts: 1225
|
Posted: Wed 10 Nov 2010, 12:04 Post subject:
|
|
| kirk wrote: | Do you have two NIC cards? I suspect you tech guy is confused. Even if you had two IP addresses that shouldn't make much difference. To check your IP address open a terminal and type ifconfig.
|
Hi. Sadly I wasn't able to do this as the system is gradually being upgraded to Windows 7 this week and I didn't want to risk "rocking the boat."
He did tell me what he thought the problem was though; apparently the Fatdog system is failing to release its IP address so it's showing up as a "ghost computer" on the network.
Maybe if I'm unable to investigate this further it's better if I write this off, especially if no one else is experiencing this problem when running Fatdog (or any other Puppy) on a networked Windows XP Pro system.
Thanks for your attention anyway,
CP .
_________________ Pentium III/866, 512 MB of RAM 80 GB hard drive running Puppy Cielo 5 "Wary" and Vector 7 Light.
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Barburo

Joined: 14 Jun 2007 Posts: 275
|
Posted: Wed 10 Nov 2010, 13:50 Post subject:
|
|
Thanks for your quick reply Kirk,
I had missed the link to the FAQ on the Home Page.
_________________ Laptop: Acer Aspire 5810TZ
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Warrior522
Joined: 03 Aug 2010 Posts: 91
|
Posted: Wed 10 Nov 2010, 14:54 Post subject:
|
|
I'm a bit confused; is 510 released yet, or are the references to using it only from those with a beta?
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Barburo

Joined: 14 Jun 2007 Posts: 275
|
Posted: Fri 12 Nov 2010, 16:43 Post subject:
System Monitor? |
|
I was wondering if there are plans to include a System Monitor in FD500.
I boot FD500 with the .sfs for 32 bit libraries and the .sfs for 32-bit OxygenOffice works just fine.
I like gkrellm (small, efficient, and multi-functional) and I tried ttuuxxx's pet from here:
http://www.murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?t=39202
I get an xmessage "gkrellm segmentation fault: (Initializing)"
B.
_________________ Laptop: Acer Aspire 5810TZ
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
moB
Joined: 19 Oct 2009 Posts: 115 Location: Coastal
|
Posted: Tue 16 Nov 2010, 05:19 Post subject:
|
|
| Colonel Panic wrote: | | kirk wrote: | Do you have two NIC cards? I suspect you tech guy is confused. Even if you had two IP addresses that shouldn't make much difference. To check your IP address open a terminal and type ifconfig.
|
Hi. Sadly I wasn't able to do this as the system is gradually being upgraded to Windows 7 this week and I didn't want to risk "rocking the boat."
He did tell me what he thought the problem was though; apparently the Fatdog system is failing to release its IP address so it's showing up as a "ghost computer" on the network.
Maybe if I'm unable to investigate this further it's better if I write this off, especially if no one else is experiencing this problem when running Fatdog (or any other Puppy) on a networked Windows XP Pro system.
Thanks for your attention anyway,
CP . |
Can you set the network to accept a static IP?
That way the DHCP lease expiring would not be an issue.
Also...
We had a similar "problem" on a LAN with two IP addresses for a box with ethernet and wifi connections, both of which were being connected to the network. If it's not the lease issue, that might well be the ticket?
Or...
To set the puppy to keep up one can set the ip to go down and back up at intervals more suitable to the msWindows LAN.
If you reconnect too quickly (ie too soon) you will get multiple IP's listed on your LAN. (Sixty seconds or more is required for most DNS records to reset.) The timeouts vary, so check with your local support.
...or something like that.
http://www.google.com/search?q=HUP+reload+linux
Best results to you
moB
It's not a linux vs ms thing.
All windows--ms wasn't even the first
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
kirk
Joined: 11 Nov 2005 Posts: 1333 Location: florida
|
Posted: Tue 16 Nov 2010, 10:18 Post subject:
|
|
| Quote: | | Can you set the network to accept a static IP? |
Yes, you'll see a button for that in the network wizard. You'll want to make sure that any static address you use is available and out of the DHCP server's range.
| Quote: | We had a similar "problem" on a LAN with two IP addresses for a box with ethernet and wifi connections, both of which were being connected to the network. If it's not the lease issue, that might well be the ticket?
|
That's only possible if you have a network cable connected and you configure your wireless card to connect. Your wireless card will not just connect on it's own, unless you have configured it to do so. If you open a terminal and type ifconfig you'll get something like this (probably not this long):
| Code: |
# ifconfig
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:26:B9:E0:A5:6A
inet addr:192.168.1.200 Bcast:192.168.1.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
UP BROADCAST MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
RX bytes:0 (0.0 B) TX bytes:0 (0.0 B)
Interrupt:20 Memory:96900000-96920000
lo Link encap:Local Loopback
inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0
UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1
RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
RX bytes:0 (0.0 B) TX bytes:0 (0.0 B)
ppp0 Link encap:Point-to-Point Protocol
inet addr:75.204.58.41 P-t-P:66.174.168.64 Mask:255.255.255.255
UP POINTOPOINT RUNNING NOARP MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:1303 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:1438 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:3
RX bytes:802841 (784.0 KiB) TX bytes:198169 (193.5 KiB)
wlan0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:23:14:DC:48:B8
inet addr:192.168.1.220 Bcast:192.168.1.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
UP BROADCAST MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
RX bytes:0 (0.0 B) TX bytes:0 (0.0 B)
# |
I'm actually using ppp0 right now which is a modem, but for this example I brought up the other interfaces and gave them addresses. Some explanation:
eth0 --- This is my hard-wired lan connection. I gave it an address of 192.168.1.200.
lo --- This is the loop-back device, it should always have an address of 127.0.0.1.
ppp0 --- This is my cell phone modem. The cell carrier's DHCP assigned me an address of 75.204.58.41.
wlan0 --- This is my wifi card. I gave it an address of 192.168.1.220.
Your interface names will vary, except for lo and probably eth0. In this example I have three ip addresses and all of my interfaces are up so ifconfig shows their status. If I had not caused all of those interfaces to be active, ifconfig would have just shown the lo interface and the interface I was actually using.
I suspect that you're using Windows, and Windows gets an IP address from your DHCP server, then when you shutdown/hybernate and Windows doesn't release that address. Then you boot up Fatdog64 and it gets an IP address from your DHCP server for that same MAC address. You might try opening a terminal on Windows (Start-run-cmd) and typing ipconfig /release and then shutting down. I don't know why you IT guy cares if your MAC address has two address assigned to it unless your running out of addresses.
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Colonel Panic

Joined: 16 Sep 2006 Posts: 1225
|
Posted: Fri 19 Nov 2010, 09:23 Post subject:
|
|
OK, finally managed to grab some quiet time in the computer suite.
Here's my ipconfig (I'm posting from Fatdog 64-500 as before);
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 48:5B:39:C2:67:66
inet addr:192.168.1.107 Bcast:192.168.1.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:31436 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:29078 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
RX bytes:36993229 (35.2 MiB) TX bytes:4148922 (3.9 MiB)
Interrupt:28 Base address:0x4000
lo Link encap:Local Loopback
inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0
UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1
RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
RX bytes:0 (0.0 B) TX bytes:0 (0.0 B)
Hope someone can make sense of this!
Cheers,
CP .
_________________ Pentium III/866, 512 MB of RAM 80 GB hard drive running Puppy Cielo 5 "Wary" and Vector 7 Light.
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
kirk
Joined: 11 Nov 2005 Posts: 1333 Location: florida
|
Posted: Fri 19 Nov 2010, 14:06 Post subject:
|
|
Colonel Panic,
That shows that you have one IP address, eth0 has an address of 192.168.1.107.
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Colonel Panic

Joined: 16 Sep 2006 Posts: 1225
|
Posted: Mon 29 Nov 2010, 09:07 Post subject:
|
|
| kirk wrote: | Colonel Panic,
That shows that you have one IP address, eth0 has an address of 192.168.1.107. |
Thanks for the info. I assume that means it's not "ghosting" on the server network any more? In any case I haven't heard any more about it from the tech people here so it may have been a one-off.
Cheers,
CP .
_________________ Pentium III/866, 512 MB of RAM 80 GB hard drive running Puppy Cielo 5 "Wary" and Vector 7 Light.
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
lakedude
Joined: 21 Oct 2008 Posts: 69
|
Posted: Thu 24 Mar 2011, 19:25 Post subject:
|
|
So is the nVidia pet labeled "510 only" also good for 511?
How much begging would I need to do to get "kill" on the right mouse click?
Great job on FD-64, thanks for all the hard work!
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
WillM
Joined: 30 Dec 2009 Posts: 99 Location: Oakland, California
|
Posted: Thu 24 Mar 2011, 20:12 Post subject:
|
|
I installed the hpijs_print and hplip_scan pets today. I am glad to say my printer works great. This is an HP PSC 1200 series. The scanner didn't fare so well. I received an error during device I/O. But I am very happy to have a printer. Thanks
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
jamesbond
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 1540 Location: The Blue Marble
|
Posted: Fri 25 Mar 2011, 03:51 Post subject:
|
|
| lakedude wrote: | | So is the nVidia pet labeled "510 only" also good for 511? | Yes, 511 is bugfix to 510 (mainly dhcpcd issues but also other small fixes - can't remember the details now). Everything else it the same.
| Quote: | | How much begging would I need to do to get "kill" on the right mouse click? | you will need to explain the feature first. I don't get what you mean. Perhaps we can do it just by tweaking the window manager configuration.
| Quote: | | Great job on FD-64, thanks for all the hard work! | You're much welcome.
_________________ Fatdog64, Slacko and Puppeee user. Puppy user since 2.13
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
jamesbond
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 1540 Location: The Blue Marble
|
Posted: Fri 25 Mar 2011, 04:08 Post subject:
|
|
| WillM wrote: | | I installed the hpijs_print and hplip_scan pets today. I am glad to say my printer works great. This is an HP PSC 1200 series. The scanner didn't fare so well. I received an error during device I/O. But I am very happy to have a printer. Thanks | Thanks to rcrsn51 for the pets
_________________ Fatdog64, Slacko and Puppeee user. Puppy user since 2.13
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
rcrsn51

Joined: 05 Sep 2006 Posts: 7752 Location: Stratford, Ontario
|
Posted: Fri 25 Mar 2011, 09:54 Post subject:
|
|
| WillM wrote: | | I installed the hpijs_print and hplip_scan pets today. I am glad to say my printer works great. This is an HP PSC 1200 series. The scanner didn't fare so well. I received an error during device I/O. |
Thanks for the feedback. I have tested these packages successfully in 511 on both a Deskjet and a Photosmart. So I don't know why a PSC would behave differently. I'm assuming that scanning worked with a 32-bit Puppy? Which HP package did you use there?
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
|