[SOLVED] GRC.com ShieldsUp! reports ports 1-103 CLOSED

For discussions about security.
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
zapjb
Posts: 21
Joined: Thu 09 Sep 2010, 06:06

[SOLVED] GRC.com ShieldsUp! reports ports 1-103 CLOSED

#1 Post by zapjb »

GRC.com ShieldsUp! reports ports 1-103 CLOSED not STEALTH. All other first 1056 ports are STEALTH. Easy fix? Or don't worry about it?
Last edited by zapjb on Sun 27 Feb 2011, 19:46, edited 2 times in total.

Sylvander
Posts: 4416
Joined: Mon 15 Dec 2008, 11:06
Location: West Lothian, Scotland, UK

#2 Post by Sylvander »

See post #92 at my Puppy Linux thread.

Lots of goodies in that thread.
If you want to take a look...
Go to the bottom of the present last page, and work backwards.

User avatar
zapjb
Posts: 21
Joined: Thu 09 Sep 2010, 06:06

#3 Post by zapjb »

Weird, weird, weird! I applied the hack. Then went to GRC. Then all ports were STEALTH except 1-73.

Then I rebooted & went to GRC. Now 1-104 are CLOSED not STEALTH.

I do appreciate any help.

jamesbond
Posts: 3433
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007, 05:02
Location: The Blue Marble

#4 Post by jamesbond »

I'm not a security expert in any measure of that word ... but here's something to think about:
a) have you turned on puppy's firewall?
b) are you behind a NAT router? If yes, GRC will probably be testing your router instead of your machine.

cheers!
Fatdog64 forum links: [url=http://murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?t=117546]Latest version[/url] | [url=https://cutt.ly/ke8sn5H]Contributed packages[/url] | [url=https://cutt.ly/se8scrb]ISO builder[/url]

User avatar
Lobster
Official Crustacean
Posts: 15522
Joined: Wed 04 May 2005, 06:06
Location: Paradox Realm
Contact:

Re: GRC.com ShieldsUp! reports ports 1-103 CLOSED not STEALTH.

#5 Post by Lobster »

zapjb wrote:Or don't worry about it?
Not only worry but wear an extra layer of tinfoil.
http://www.murga-linux.com/puppy/viewto ... 158#398158

Also make sure you are slowing yourself with the Tor browser if using Puppy Lucid
:)

In ye olde days we never had a firewall not even in the router
Using Puppy in this way, would still be safer than mainstream
alternatives offer on mobiles or desktops.

Hey I know - let's run as root and not put the Puppy firewall on
and visit every dubious site we can, something might happen . . . :roll:

Stay safe
Use Puppy

:wink:
Puppy Raspup 8.2Final 8)
Puppy Links Page http://www.smokey01.com/bruceb/puppy.html :D

User avatar
zapjb
Posts: 21
Joined: Thu 09 Sep 2010, 06:06

#6 Post by zapjb »

jamesbond wrote:I'm not a security expert in any measure of that word ... but here's something to think about:
a) have you turned on puppy's firewall?
b) are you behind a NAT router? If yes, GRC will probably be testing your router instead of your machine.

cheers!
That's gotta be it. I have a ATT wireless gateway (router). I feel silly thanks.

Post Reply