Puppy Linux Discussion Forum Forum Index Puppy Linux Discussion Forum
Puppy HOME page : puppylinux.com
"THE" alternative forum : puppylinux.info
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

The time now is Sat 28 Mar 2020, 10:30
All times are UTC - 4

 Forum index » Taking the Puppy out for a walk » Suggestions
Can 32-bit Puppy use >3 GB of RAM? (Yes, with PAE)
Moderators: Flash, Ian, JohnMurga
Post new topic   Reply to topic View previous topic :: View next topic
Page 3 of 8 [106 Posts]   Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 Next
Author Message
p310don

Joined: 19 May 2009
Posts: 1485
Location: Brisbane, Australia
PostPosted: Thu 17 Mar 2011, 21:37    Post subject:  
I see this

Computer
Processor 2x AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 5600+
Memory 3115MB (208MB used)
Operating System Puppy Linux 0.52
User Name root (root)
Date/Time Fri 18 Mar 2011 11:33:26 EST

I am not running as pfix=ram as you are (?) but I did try it as such, and get the same ram figure. The filesystem shows my save file, as opposed to my memory size.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message 
gcmartin

Joined: 14 Oct 2005
Posts: 6730
Location: Earth
PostPosted: Fri 18 Mar 2011, 00:03    Post subject: Problem with RAM use on a 4GB system  
p310don wrote:
I see this

Computer
Processor 2x AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 5600+
Memory 3115MB (208MB used)
Operating System Puppy Linux 0.52
User Name root (root)
Date/Time Fri 18 Mar 2011 11:33:26 EST

I am not running as pfix=ram as you are (?) but I did try it as such, and get the same ram figure. The filesystem shows my save file, as opposed to my memory size.
You did NOT post your filesystem report for some reason.
Observation: You may want to download and run FATDOG on your platform to see results that you obtain. I get different results when using FATDOG....but that is 64bit versus 'your call for 32bit".

Check this: Do you have a SWAP partition or are you running a swap file that resides in your system's file system? We can't help you if you don't share enough information that we can use to pin-point your problem.
Flash wrote:
Here's what I see, in a computer with 4 GB of RAM but no hard disk, running Puppy from a multisession DVD.
...
You peaked my interest, so I shutdown and booted WARY. Here's what I got so, maybe, there is a bug (but, certainly, this needs more investigation.).

Heres my report which should match what you have. I am running latest WARY LiveDVD on same system which has a SWAP partition on the local HDD. I am missing storage, same as you.
Code:
-Computer-
Processor      : 2x AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 4600+
Memory      : 3634MB (135MB used)
Operating System      : Puppy Linux 0.50
User Name      : root (root)
Date/Time      : Thu 17 Mar 2011 11:04:07 PM UTC
and
Code:
-Mounted File Systems-
rootfs   /   0.28 % (3.7 GiB of 3.8 GiB)   
tmpfs   /initrd/pup_rw   0.28 % (3.7 GiB of 3.8 GiB)   
tmpfs   /initrd/mnt/tmpfs   99.09 % (900.0 KiB of 96.4 MiB)   
/dev/loop0   /initrd/pup_ro2   100.00 % (0.0 B of 95.5 MiB)   
unionfs   /   0.28 % (3.7 GiB of 3.8 GiB)   
shmfs   /dev/shm   0.00 % (859.1 MiB of 859.1 MiB)
Code:
# df -l
Filesystem           1K-blocks      Used Available Use% Mounted on
tmpfs                  3933876     10972   3922904   1% /initrd/pup_rw
tmpfs                    98704     97804       900 100% /initrd/mnt/tmpfs
/dev/loop0               97792     97792         0 100% /initrd/pup_ro2
unionfs                3933876     10972   3922904   1% /
shmfs                   879764         0    879764   0% /dev/shm
Code:
# fdisk -l
Disk /dev/sda: 500.1 GB, 500107862016 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 60801 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
Disk identifier: 0x000b935d

   Device Boot      Start         End      Blocks   Id  System
/dev/sda1           59918       60801     7100730    5  Extended
/dev/sda2               1        6374    51199123+  83  Linux
/dev/sda5           60275       60801     4233127+  82  Linux swap / Solaris

Partition table entries are not in disk order
I'm going to report this as a potential bug.

Hope this helps
_________________
Get ACTIVE Create Circles; Do those good things which benefit people's needs!
We are all related ... Its time to show that we know this!
3 Different Puppy Search Engines or use DogPile
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message 
gcmartin

Joined: 14 Oct 2005
Posts: 6730
Location: Earth
PostPosted: Sat 19 Mar 2011, 03:26    Post subject: Got the same results on other 32bit PUPs  
I got, virtually, the same results on following 32bit Pups:
    Luci256
    MacPUP 520
    WARY5.1.1
    QuickSet-WARY 505q
    LightHouse 5.03G
Hope this helps
_________________
Get ACTIVE Create Circles; Do those good things which benefit people's needs!
We are all related ... Its time to show that we know this!
3 Different Puppy Search Engines or use DogPile

Last edited by gcmartin on Wed 23 Mar 2011, 01:55; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message 
scsijon

Joined: 23 May 2007
Posts: 1589
Location: the australian mallee
PostPosted: Sat 19 Mar 2011, 04:37    Post subject:  
1/ A part of the problem can be hardware chipsets, a lot of the 32bit chipsets used on motherboards have saved components by using some of the addressing matrixes for their internal device addressing.

2/ It hasn't been that long since the standard memory was stepped up from 256meg to 1gig and with 4 memory slots it was planned for 1 or 2gig (using alternate slots) just not 4gig. The possability of 4gig or even 16gig cards was in the address space for the memory socket, just not expected to be used by all motherboards.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website 
bigpup


Joined: 11 Oct 2009
Posts: 13458
Location: S.C. USA
PostPosted: Sat 19 Mar 2011, 07:38    Post subject:  
James C wrote:
All 32 bit Linux kernels (without PAE enabled) are limited to using about 3.2 to 3.4 Gb of ram ........minus reserved ram for onboard graphics, etc. It's a kernel limitation that applies to all distros...not just Puppy.
As an example, I just booted Ubuntu 10.10 in a box with 4 Gb ram.... it only showed 2.7 Gb ram .....the 3.2 minus 512 Mb for the graphics equals the 2.7 Gb that shows.
The solution is a PAE enabled kernel or run a 64 bit version.

See here
http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-general-1/32-bit-os-and-4gb-memory-limit-707762/#post3458590
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message 
gcmartin

Joined: 14 Oct 2005
Posts: 6730
Location: Earth
PostPosted: Sat 19 Mar 2011, 13:15    Post subject: PAE or 64bit seems to be the answer  
Thanks #BIGpup. 32bit PUPs do not support modern hardware like 64bit FATDOG does. That's why I am getting differing readings using differing PUPs vs FATDOG on the same system.

Request: If anyone is running a 32bit PUP on any PC that has 6GB/8GB, Please post your Hardinfo summary for a review. Thanks in advance.
Edited Today, at 4:15 pm EST - Don't bother to post on the "Request" I ask..
I just found out that this is an issue that BarryK or 32bit PUP system builders are going to have to address. It appears to be an oversight by them. Appears to have been an oversight for quite a while.

Thanks to @p310don for bringing this to the forum's attentions. Thanks again, BIGpup, for your expert help.
_________________
Get ACTIVE Create Circles; Do those good things which benefit people's needs!
We are all related ... Its time to show that we know this!
3 Different Puppy Search Engines or use DogPile
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message 
Flash
Official Dog Handler


Joined: 04 May 2005
Posts: 13542
Location: Arizona USA
PostPosted: Sat 19 Mar 2011, 15:59    Post subject: Re: PAE or 64bit seems to be the answer  
gcmartin wrote:
Appears to have been an oversight for quite a while.

Thanks to @p310don for bringing this to the forum's attentions. Thanks again, BIGpup, for your expert help.

This is not the first time the question has come up in the forum. Perhaps a year or two ago there was a thread discussing why neither Linux nor Windows see more than about 3.3 GB of RAM.

If it's a bug in Linux, or at least in Puppy, then Windows seems to have it too.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message 
James C


Joined: 26 Mar 2009
Posts: 6734
Location: Kentucky
PostPosted: Sat 19 Mar 2011, 16:38    Post subject: Re: PAE or 64bit seems to be the answer  
Flash wrote:
gcmartin wrote:
Appears to have been an oversight for quite a while.

Thanks to @p310don for bringing this to the forum's attentions. Thanks again, BIGpup, for your expert help.

This is not the first time the question has come up in the forum. Perhaps a year or two ago there was a thread discussing why neither Linux nor Windows see more than about 3.3 GB of RAM.

If it's a bug in Linux, or at least in Puppy, then Windows seems to have it too.


It's a 32 bit limitation, period. Windows and all 32 bit Linux distros without the PAE kernel will only show about 3.2 to 3.4 Gb of ram.I'm not going to get into all the physical memory addresses and virtual memory addresses stuff .......it's not a bug or oversight...it's just a reality.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message 
p310don

Joined: 19 May 2009
Posts: 1485
Location: Brisbane, Australia
PostPosted: Sat 19 Mar 2011, 17:24    Post subject:  
To summarise, and try to bring things back on track - standart puppies DO NOT see more than 3.1ish gig of ram, because they are 32bit, NOT A BUG WITH PUPPY. This is a limitation as a result of being a 32bit operating system. Google it for further explanation.

The point of this thread isn't to imply a bug with puppy, but I was hoping that a puppy dev genius, might be able to address the issue with an ingeniously creative solution.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message 
Flash
Official Dog Handler


Joined: 04 May 2005
Posts: 13542
Location: Arizona USA
PostPosted: Sat 19 Mar 2011, 21:52    Post subject:  
All I can say is, 2^32 = nearly 4.3 GB.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message 
amigo

Joined: 02 Apr 2007
Posts: 2647
PostPosted: Sun 20 Mar 2011, 04:04    Post subject:  
I'll say again that the kernel does see all 4GB. But, it reserves ~1GB for itself leaving only ~GB available to userspace. It is a bit of a waste because the kernel will never need all that for itself, but the only way to change those proportions is to patch the kernel. With PAE enabled, the kernel can see above 4GB and also allows a way to change the proportion dynamically (IIRC).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message 
jamesbond

Joined: 26 Feb 2007
Posts: 3460
Location: The Blue Marble
PostPosted: Sun 20 Mar 2011, 06:10    Post subject:  
Time for a test then Smile

I just checked, Barry's kernels don't have HIGHMEM64GB enabled (I think this is what is needed to enable PAE). All that is needed to do is to get Barry's kernel package, enable this config item, and re-build the kernel, then supplant the new kernel into existing puppy (e.g. latest Wary for example). If we're lucky then we don't even need to rebuild the modules, it would be just straightforward swap of vmlinuz with the new bzImage.

Then those having more than 4GB of RAM can do a test, and see whether the ramdisk thing is really working ...

Anyone?
_________________
Fatdog64 forum links: Latest version | Contributed packages | ISO builder
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message 
p310don

Joined: 19 May 2009
Posts: 1485
Location: Brisbane, Australia
PostPosted: Sun 20 Mar 2011, 07:26    Post subject:  
Jamesbond...

Quote:
Time for a test then Smile


Agreed. Now, I don't have the skill to patch kernels, but if someone wants to do it, I will happily test it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message 
ecube


Joined: 11 Jul 2008
Posts: 88
Location: Västerås, Sweden
PostPosted: Mon 21 Mar 2011, 15:08    Post subject:  
I don't know if it has any bearing on the topic discussed, but I was successful in adapting Fluppy 06 to 4 GB RAM. Very Happy
http://www.murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?p=460557#460557
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message 
p310don

Joined: 19 May 2009
Posts: 1485
Location: Brisbane, Australia
PostPosted: Mon 21 Mar 2011, 18:45    Post subject:  
Ecube - how is that working out for you? Are there any stability issues? Did it increase the size of fluppy significantly? Have you noticed any pros and/or cons?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message 
Display posts from previous:   Sort by:   
Page 3 of 8 [106 Posts]   Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 Next
Post new topic   Reply to topic View previous topic :: View next topic
 Forum index » Taking the Puppy out for a walk » Suggestions
Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group

[ Time: 0.0723s ][ Queries: 13 (0.0148s) ][ GZIP on ]