Kernel build script

Under development: PCMCIA, wireless, etc.
Message
Author
User avatar
sc0ttman
Posts: 2812
Joined: Wed 16 Sep 2009, 05:44
Location: UK

#41 Post by sc0ttman »

Iguleder wrote:Theoretically, yes - but it's a very bad idea, for two reasons:
1) You can't install a kernel in Puppy, you'll have to remaster or rebuild your Puppy for that.
2) The kernel is a very sensitive component - it deserves its own build system.
I thought it would be wrong to put it in there, as its not installable in the same way as the pther packages, just wondered.
[b][url=https://bit.ly/2KjtxoD]Pkg[/url], [url=https://bit.ly/2U6dzxV]mdsh[/url], [url=https://bit.ly/2G49OE8]Woofy[/url], [url=http://goo.gl/bzBU1]Akita[/url], [url=http://goo.gl/SO5ug]VLC-GTK[/url], [url=https://tiny.cc/c2hnfz]Search[/url][/b]

User avatar
Lothar
Posts: 15
Joined: Thu 02 Jun 2011, 09:01

#42 Post by Lothar »

Hey Iguleder and Pemasu,

I emailed J R Okajima (the man behind Aufs) in regard to the aufs-allow-sfs patch, and he wanted me to ask:

"Would you try aufs without the aufs-allow-sfs patch? I think it should work since July last year."

User avatar
Iguleder
Posts: 2026
Joined: Tue 11 Aug 2009, 09:36
Location: Israel, somewhere in the beautiful desert
Contact:

#43 Post by Iguleder »

If it works, don't touch it :lol:

All Puppy's kernels are built with this patch and work just fine, and I don't want to do all the testing that follows its removal. It causes zero issues, so I see no problem with using it.
[url=http://dimakrasner.com/]My homepage[/url]
[url=https://github.com/dimkr]My GitHub profile[/url]

Post Reply