| Author |
Message |
darkcity

Joined: 23 May 2010 Posts: 2215 Location: near here
|
Posted: Wed 15 Feb 2012, 08:09 Post subject:
Reducing latency with nice, rtprio & memlock |
|
I watched a youtube about setting up real time audio on ubuntu-
they recommended adding three commands in profile setup-
rtprio 99
memlock unlimited
nice -10
it was in a file called some thing like /etc/security/limits.conf
puppy doesn't have this file, but it is possible to use the nice command.
setting a negative nice means the program will hog the resource, which is
what you want your audio progs to do-
for example run jack with a negative nice
is there any Puppy equivalent to
rtprio 99
memlock unlimited
these commands aren't recognised in the terminal
_________________ Wiki Audacity 2.0.1
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
trapster

Joined: 28 Nov 2005 Posts: 1966 Location: Maine, USA
|
Posted: Wed 15 Feb 2012, 13:29 Post subject:
|
|
See Here
_________________ trapster
Maine, USA
Asus eeepc 1005HA PU1X-BK
Frugal install:Puppeee4.31 + 1.0, Puppy4.10 + Lupu52
Currently using Puppeee-1.0 AND lupu52 w/ fluxbox
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
darkcity

Joined: 23 May 2010 Posts: 2215 Location: near here
|
Posted: Thu 16 Feb 2012, 20:44 Post subject:
|
|
Thanks for your answer.
I;ve just spent an age looking at the Arguments for and against ALSA /OSS
http://insanecoding.blogspot.com/2009/06/state-of-sound-in-linux-not-so-sorry.html
has latencytop been packaged for puppy?
http://latencytop.org/
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Aitch

Joined: 04 Apr 2007 Posts: 6825 Location: Chatham, Kent, UK
|
Posted: Thu 16 Feb 2012, 22:22 Post subject:
|
|
For real low latency, realtime kernel, as done by l0wt3ch for Studio 3/4
Aitch
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
darkcity

Joined: 23 May 2010 Posts: 2215 Location: near here
|
Posted: Fri 17 Feb 2012, 06:38 Post subject:
|
|
yep, I've heard Studio 3.3 is a good solution for many. However it doesn't handle pup save files in a standard way and Studio 4 is no longer community developed.
_________________ Wiki Audacity 2.0.1
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
-_-
Joined: 10 Feb 2012 Posts: 20
|
Posted: Sat 18 Feb 2012, 18:16 Post subject:
|
|
I personally prefer Puppy especially as this overheating HP laptop of mine keeps itself cooler with Puppy than with the factory installed Vista. Things change radically with a realtime kernel, so unfortunately I have to avoid using Puppy Studio no matter how works-out-of-the-box version it is...
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Lothar

Joined: 02 Jun 2011 Posts: 14
|
Posted: Sat 18 Feb 2012, 21:11 Post subject:
|
|
| darkcity wrote: | yep, I've heard Studio 3.3 is a good solution for many. However it doesn't handle pup save files in a standard way and Studio 4 is no longer community developed.
 |
You're tripping. Puppy Studio saves the exact same way as the Lucid version it's based upon. And it was never "community developed", some people suggested a few apps to include, that was all. It was l0wt3ch's baby from beginning to end. No-one else has been able to match it's selection of programs, ease of use, or completeness. And even if somebody did someday, he'd just be a copycat wannabe, copying the example of what l0wt3ch had already done.
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
darkcity

Joined: 23 May 2010 Posts: 2215 Location: near here
|
Posted: Sun 19 Feb 2012, 05:42 Post subject:
|
|
are the following commands just part of PAM http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linux_PAM
rtprio 99
memlock unlimited
?
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Aitch

Joined: 04 Apr 2007 Posts: 6825 Location: Chatham, Kent, UK
|
Posted: Sun 19 Feb 2012, 06:23 Post subject:
|
|
If only walking with women were as easy.
Aitch
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
|