Puppy Linux Discussion Forum

Geoffrey · Posted: Thu 20 Oct 2011, 22:16 Post subject:

Rocket,

Thanks that fixed it, nice mod

Geoffrey

Rocket · Joined: 02 Mar 2010 Posts: 8

sc0ttman:

Tested it on Wary 5.14 and it seems to work fine as shown here.

pemasu · Joined: 08 Jul 2009 Posts: 5170 Location: Finland

Works now fine in soon uploaded Dpup Exprimo 5.X.9.

sc0ttman · Joined: 16 Sep 2009 Posts: 2174 Location: UK

disciple · Posted: Sat 22 Oct 2011, 07:02 Post subject:

1. It shouldn't save 300kb when you put it in an .sfs (although I'm surprised - it does actually save 40kb).
2. The only problem you're likely to encounter with upxing is that ldd doesn't work on a upxed executable. But I don't think I've ever see anyone needing to ldd rox...

sc0ttman · Joined: 16 Sep 2009 Posts: 2174 Location: UK

[quote="disciple"]1. It shouldn't save 300kb when you put it in an .sfs (although I'm surprised - it does actually save 40kb).[.quote]
But it unpacks into less RAM..

disciple · Posted: Sat 22 Oct 2011, 09:17 Post subject:

disciple · Posted: Sat 22 Oct 2011, 09:25 Post subject:

technosaurus · Joined: 18 May 2008 Posts: 3843

here it is with latest git:
compiled with the -u user name support
removed the automatic display if running as root
(usually people remove the user requested version trying to eliminate the unrequested "running as user root")
no longer requires glade
It is smaller due to compiler optimizations, not upx-ing

I just packed the actual binary, feel free to make your own pet/puplet with it.

Here are the direct dependencies now:

disciple · Posted: Sat 22 Oct 2011, 18:34 Post subject:

technosaurus · Joined: 18 May 2008 Posts: 3843

AFAIK all that is needed is a recompile of gtkdialog and use glipper-lite instead of glipper.

Karl Godt · Joined: 20 Jun 2010 Posts: 2677 Location: Kiel,Germany

Short Note about Rocket's and technosaurus's ROX-FILER-2.11 binaries :

1 . They both require GLIBC >=2.7 , so wont work on Puppy 4 series
2 . Both Rocket's and technosaurus's binaries dont show the show_user_message
3 . Since ROX-Filer -v 2.10 opening rox /proc tends to freeze the whole filer there @/proc
-> needs killall ROX-Filer and both Rocket's and technosauros's have the same behaviour . This behaviour appears mainly with save-file , not in PUPMODE=5 .

I have compiled ./AppRun --compile rox-2.10 with
/usr/include/apsymbols.h

proebler · Joined: 24 Jan 2012 Posts: 52 Location: TAS

Trying it out in Slacko 5.3.1, running from USB, frugal.

just down-loaded ROX-Filer-2.11-treeview_moveable_columns.fixed.tar.gz

1. extracted ROX-Filer (fom above)
2. renamed /usr/local/apps/ROX-Filer/ROX-Filer > RROX-Filer
3. copied-in the extracted ROX-Filer
4. restarted X server

seems to work ok with slackosave.2fs

Thank you Rocket, I like it!

L18L · Posted: Mon 19 Mar 2012, 08:53 Post subject: Re: ROX-Filer Modification

running racy5.2.90 frugal.
ROX-Filer has movable columns

Anyhow, smaller file size is a good reason for testing:

1. extracted ROX-Filer (fom above)
2. renamed /usr/local/apps/ROX-Filer/ROX-Filer > ROX-Filer.orig
3. copied-in the extracted ROX-Filer

# /usr/local/apps/ROX-Filer/AppRun
/usr/local/apps/ROX-Filer/ROX-Filer: /usr/lib/libxml2.so.2: no version information available (required by /usr/local/apps/ROX-Filer/ROX-Filer)
#
Crying or Very sad