| Author |
Message |
Gnuxo
Joined: 09 Feb 2012 Posts: 360
|
Posted: Thu 21 Jun 2012, 19:36 Post_subject:
Dillo is dead. :( Sub_title: Why did they rename it D+? |
|
I was going around Softpedia and I came upon a browser called D+, and right in the title it said:
"Formerly called Dillo"
...And I have to ask why.
Dillo is a good name, why call it D+?
Homepage: http://dplus-browser.sourceforge.net/
Sofpedia entry: http://www.softpedia.com/get/Internet/Browsers/Dillo.shtml
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
harii4

Joined: 30 Jan 2009 Posts: 444 Location: La Porte City, IA , U.S.A.
|
Posted: Thu 21 Jun 2012, 22:07 Post_subject:
|
|
I really don't think Dillo is dead.
It looks like an windows dillo port - fork
1.3 MB / Windows All
http://dplus-browser.sourceforge.net/
_________________ 3.01 Fat Free / Fire Hydrant featherweight/ TXZ_pup / 431JP2012
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peace and Justice are two sides of the same coin.
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
raffy
Joined: 25 May 2005 Posts: 4639 Location: Manila
|
Posted: Fri 22 Jun 2012, 10:36 Post_subject:
Re: Dillo is dead. :( Sub_title: Why did they rename it D+? |
|
| Gnuxo wrote: | | Dillo is a good name, why call it D+? |
Hmm, here's an example reason: one guy typed it the wrong way here and it suddenly became a s3x object (try replacing the second L with D).
_________________ Puppy user since Oct 2004. Want FreeOffice? Get the sfs (English only).
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Keef

Joined: 20 Dec 2007 Posts: 433 Location: Staffordshire
|
Posted: Fri 22 Jun 2012, 18:48 Post_subject:
|
|
| Quote: | | (try replacing the second L with D). |
Good name for a wireless security tool.
(penetration testing)
I'll get my coat...
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
lmemsm
Joined: 27 Jun 2012 Posts: 11
|
Posted: Wed 27 Jun 2012, 11:18 Post_subject:
|
|
D+ is a fork of Dillo. It works well cross-platform (unlike Dillo). It looked fairly cleanly coded when I was going through and looking at the source. (Much easier to find things in the D+ source code than it was to do so in the lynx source code.) I prefer programs that run well on multiple operating systems, because I use multiple operating systems for different circumstances. Am using D+ on some of my machines now and hope to build and have it running on all of them. If you're looking for a lightweight, cross-platform browser, I'd recommend trying it.
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Gnuxo
Joined: 09 Feb 2012 Posts: 360
|
Posted: Wed 27 Jun 2012, 23:29 Post_subject:
|
|
I'm not a coder but lmemsim, if you can do it and make a pet, I'd use it.
...But I don't know if Dillo is still being actively developed.
D+ would be interesting to try for sure.
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
|