The State of Package Management

What features/apps/bugfixes needed in a future Puppy

Should Puppy's package format be changed?

Yes, without backwards compatibility.
11
28%
Yes, with backwards compatibility.
10
26%
No, but the PET format should be standardized/stricter.
8
21%
No, the PET format works fine.
10
26%
 
Total votes: 39

Message
Author
disciple
Posts: 6984
Joined: Sun 21 May 2006, 01:46
Location: Auckland, New Zealand

#221 Post by disciple »

bark_bark_bark wrote:I think the PPM is fine the way it is.
So you like the package manager, but do you think there should be an improvement in the package repository, or are you happy with the forum being the de facto repository?
Do you know a good gtkdialog program? Please post a link here

Classic Puppy quotes

ROOT FOREVER
GTK2 FOREVER

bark_bark_bark
Posts: 1885
Joined: Tue 05 Jun 2012, 12:17
Location: Wisconsin USA

#222 Post by bark_bark_bark »

well maybe there should be on going updates for packages in the OFFICIAL repos, while the packages here get signed (by the devs) and added to the repo.
....

Post Reply