Puppy Gnome 3.2 & 3.4.2 !!

For talk and support relating specifically to Puppy derivatives
Message
Author
User avatar
Jejy69
Posts: 710
Joined: Thu 20 Jan 2011, 18:10
Location: Perpignan

Puppy Gnome 3.2 & 3.4.2 !!

#1 Post by Jejy69 »

Curiosity, Armstrong, I think the space conquest is at the center of our lives at the moment... I release today, a new version, more stable with Gnome 3.4.2, with a "space theme", in honor of our progress on the worlds around us.

[NEW]: Gnome 3.4.2 update !
-Gnome 3.4.2 applications, like evince, Yelp etc...
-Puppy Menu
-More plugins, like clock.
-More stable
-Nautilus, cursor fixed !
-Really stable
-light, 215mo, 215mo with Gnome 3.4.2 !

Image

Image

http://sourceforge.net/projects/puppygnome342/
____________________________________________________
Hi all !

In continuation of the project on the derivative of Slacko with Gnome 2.32, I have dwelt on this subject: Gnome 3.0.

I release an iso first, with the Gnome 3.2, this an Alpha version.
This is of course a test version.
You can find:
-Gnome 3.2, with 2 panels
-All Gnome applications in 3.x
-Gtk is updated, GTK-3
-Glib updated too.

Image

Image

Iso here ( 278mb ) : http://e-nautia.com/disk/download.php?id=2529905

https://docs.google.com/open?id=0B4gCm9 ... XBDNWhVbVE

Tips Image :
-To right click on the panels, use the following combination:
alt + right click
-To get the icons on desktop, simply launch nautilus.
-To launch Gnome : xwin gnome-session
Attachments
capture31606.png
(180.49 KiB) Downloaded 1322 times
Last edited by Jejy69 on Thu 30 Aug 2012, 09:53, edited 4 times in total.
I'm Commander Shepard and this is my favorite Linux distrbution on the Citadel.

User avatar
Terryphi
Posts: 761
Joined: Wed 02 Jul 2008, 09:32
Location: West Wales, Britain.

Re: Gnome 3.2 on Puppy ?

#2 Post by Terryphi »

Jejy69 wrote:Hi all !

In continuation of the project on the derivative of Slacko with Gnome 2.32, I have dwelt on this subject: Gnome 3.0.

I would just show you this picture that sums up a big possibilty.
For now, only Gnome-shell does not work, but a solution should be found!
I could update many more applications ! :D

Would you agree with this idea?
Gnome 2.32: yes. Gnome 3.x: NO!
[b]Classic Opera 12.16 browser SFS package[/b] for Precise, Slacko, Racy, Wary, Lucid, etc available[url=http://terryphillips.org.uk/operasfs.htm]here[/url] :)

User avatar
kooliepup
Posts: 292
Joined: Sat 14 Jan 2012, 03:40
Location: Victoria, Australia

#3 Post by kooliepup »

What he said.
With bells on.

As a person who has always hated Gnome, I am now a Gnome convert with your 2.32.
(with some reservations).
You have done a fabulous job with 232.

Don't afflict Puppy with Gnome3.


BTW, 232 won't resize a savefile.

User avatar
Terryphi
Posts: 761
Joined: Wed 02 Jul 2008, 09:32
Location: West Wales, Britain.

#4 Post by Terryphi »

kooliepup wrote: BTW, won't resize a savefile.
Confirmed. resizepfile.sh does not write file pupsavresize.txt . I haven't had time to look closely. Can anyone spot the bug?

It is possible to resize by creating a file pupsavresize.txt and place at /mnt/home.

Inside pupsaveresize.txt put a number, 1024 for each mb to be added.
For example to add 32 mb to savefile size put 32768.

Reboot and it will run the resize routine.
[b]Classic Opera 12.16 browser SFS package[/b] for Precise, Slacko, Racy, Wary, Lucid, etc available[url=http://terryphillips.org.uk/operasfs.htm]here[/url] :)

User avatar
Jejy69
Posts: 710
Joined: Thu 20 Jan 2011, 18:10
Location: Perpignan

#5 Post by Jejy69 »

Hi,

I have the same error here ...
No error message yet.

What's weird is that the script works through JWM.
I'm Commander Shepard and this is my favorite Linux distrbution on the Citadel.

Jim1911
Posts: 2460
Joined: Mon 19 May 2008, 20:39
Location: Texas, USA

Re: Gnome 3.2 on Puppy ?

#6 Post by Jim1911 »

Jejy69 wrote:Hi all !

In continuation of the project on the derivative of Slacko with Gnome 2.32, I have dwelt on this subject: Gnome 3.0.

I would just show you this picture that sums up a big possibilty.
For now, only Gnome-shell does not work, but a solution should be found!
I could update many more applications ! :D

Would you agree with this idea?
You've done some fine work with 2.3.2. Keep it up with 3.0, don't let others who don't like change discourage your initiative.

Cheers,
Jim

User avatar
Terryphi
Posts: 761
Joined: Wed 02 Jul 2008, 09:32
Location: West Wales, Britain.

#7 Post by Terryphi »

Jejy69 wrote:Hi,

I have the same error here ...
No error message yet.

What's weird is that the script works through JWM.
If you replace resizepfile.sh with the one from Racy 5.3 it works.

Sorry, this should be in your earlier thread http://www.murga-linux.com/puppy/viewto ... 891#640891
[b]Classic Opera 12.16 browser SFS package[/b] for Precise, Slacko, Racy, Wary, Lucid, etc available[url=http://terryphillips.org.uk/operasfs.htm]here[/url] :)

User avatar
Jejy69
Posts: 710
Joined: Thu 20 Jan 2011, 18:10
Location: Perpignan

#8 Post by Jejy69 »

Hello !
You've done some fine work with 2.3.2. Keep it up with 3.0, don't let others who don't like change discourage your initiative.
Thank you for the support, I confess I did not expect so many cons. :?
I do not understand why gnome attracts both barrels, is it the weight? Consumption of memory?
I can understand that many people do not like gnome-shell, but there is no question here ...

@ Terryphi, thank you for the tip, I'll try.
I'm Commander Shepard and this is my favorite Linux distrbution on the Citadel.

User avatar
Jejy69
Posts: 710
Joined: Thu 20 Jan 2011, 18:10
Location: Perpignan

#9 Post by Jejy69 »

First ISO to test, in the first post.
I'm Commander Shepard and this is my favorite Linux distrbution on the Citadel.

Gnuxo
Posts: 365
Joined: Thu 09 Feb 2012, 19:01

#10 Post by Gnuxo »

Why is there no LXDE puppy?
...Or Equinox? *Lighter then LXDE*

Why are people trying to introduce lag into the puppy community?

Is that what this puppy will be called? --Laggy pup?*

There's plenty of desktop environments to choose from that are more intuitive and fun to use then Gnome 3, believe me.

...And let me guess, someone will try to make a Unity pup.
...Well Unity 2D? --Ubuntu is killing it off in the next release;
Wait no! I don't want Unity either!

User avatar
Iguleder
Posts: 2026
Joined: Tue 11 Aug 2009, 09:36
Location: Israel, somewhere in the beautiful desert
Contact:

#11 Post by Iguleder »

Gnuxo wrote:Why is there no LXDE puppy?
...Or Equinox? *Lighter then LXDE*
Be the first :)
Gnuxo wrote:There's plenty of desktop environments to choose from that are more intuitive and fun to use then Gnome 3, believe me.
Intuitive and fun for you, not for everyone.

I think it's good to have choice and I'm sure a vast majority of the Puppy community agrees with me - some like GNOME 3 just as much as you like LXDE and Equinox.

Jejy69 - great work! Have you considered making a MATE Puppy? I began exploring its dependencies, maybe I'll automate the compilation.
[url=http://dimakrasner.com/]My homepage[/url]
[url=https://github.com/dimkr]My GitHub profile[/url]

Gnuxo
Posts: 365
Joined: Thu 09 Feb 2012, 19:01

#12 Post by Gnuxo »

I think it's good to have choice and I'm sure a vast majority of the Puppy community agrees with me - some like GNOME 3 just as much as you like LXDE and Equinox.
Point taken. Sorry.

User avatar
Jejy69
Posts: 710
Joined: Thu 20 Jan 2011, 18:10
Location: Perpignan

#13 Post by Jejy69 »

???

Unity ? What is this extremism ?
If it is to give that kind of response, you can refrain yourself ...
What do you mean by lag?
Laggy Puppy ? What's your ?

Seriously, I think you can stop there, because if it is to troll, you can try somewhere else, or you lack common sense ...
If you do not like, I can understand, expressed yourself properly, your opinions intelligently, and give a constructive opinion helpful.

LXDE ? Ah ah, it already exists, looking a little ... Image

Laggy...
I'm Commander Shepard and this is my favorite Linux distrbution on the Citadel.

User avatar
James C
Posts: 6618
Joined: Thu 26 Mar 2009, 05:12
Location: Kentucky

#14 Post by James C »

Just a quick basic hardware check......sound,internet and display all correct on initial boot. As I'm sure you know,some things are working....some not. But it's only an Alpha..... :lol:

-Computer-
Processor : 4x AMD Athlon(tm) II X4 620 Processor
Memory : 2854MB (195MB used)
Operating System : Unknown distribution
User Name : root (root)
Date/Time : Fri 20 Jul 2012 12:44:36 PM CDT
-Display-
Resolution : 1366x768 pixels
OpenGL Renderer : Unknown
X11 Vendor : The X.Org Foundation
-Multimedia-
Audio Adapter : HDA-Intel - HDA NVidia

-Version-
Kernel : Linux 3.1.10-slacko_4gA (i686)
Compiled : #1 SMP Tue Mar 13 14:58:11 EST 2012
C Library : GNU C Library version 2.13 (stable)
Default C Compiler : Unknown
Distribution : Unknown distribution
-Current Session-
Computer Name : puppypc8374
User Name : root (root)
Home Directory : /root
Desktop Environment : Unknown (Window Manager: Metacity)

More testing later........

User avatar
Jejy69
Posts: 710
Joined: Thu 20 Jan 2011, 18:10
Location: Perpignan

#15 Post by Jejy69 »

Great work! Have you considered making a MATE Puppy? I began exploring its dependencies, maybe I'll automate the compilation.
Thank, for reply ! :)
MATE ? Yes, it's an objective, and I must admit I am also tempted by cinnamon. If you succeed, let me know! :D
Just a quick basic hardware check......sound,internet and display all correct on initial boot. As I'm sure you know,some things are working....some not. But it's only an Alpha.....
Yes, some not ! 8) it begins quite well then, if all services are running. :D
I put online soon locales, and docs. :)
I'm Commander Shepard and this is my favorite Linux distrbution on the Citadel.

User avatar
oldyeller
Posts: 889
Joined: Tue 15 Nov 2011, 14:26
Location: Alaska

#16 Post by oldyeller »

I like what you have done with 2.32

I did try and do cinnamon but I really don't know much about compiling.

I like gnome 3 as well it would be great too if this could also be done through woof. Maybe a dev would like to help you do this.

What do you think?

Cheers

oldyeller

User avatar
James C
Posts: 6618
Joined: Thu 26 Mar 2009, 05:12
Location: Kentucky

#17 Post by James C »

Just made an interesting discovery........ during my first test on the newish quad-core using the "nouveau" driver there was no wallpaper or menu icons but now on my old Athlon XP box with an old Nvidia card using "nv" everything appears normal.Cool.

# report-video
nv
Slacko Puppy, version 5.3.3 on Fri 20 Jul 2012

Chip description:
0.0 VGA compatible controller
nVidia Corporation NV18 [GeForce4 MX 440 AGP 8x] (rev c1)
oem: NVidia
product: NV18 () Board Chip Rev A2

X Server: Xorg
Driver used: nv

X.Org version: 1.9.5
dimensions: 1440x900 pixels (411x263 millimeters)
depth of root window: 24 planes

...the above also recorded in /tmp/root/ as report-video,
and archived with xorg.conf and Xorg.0.log as report-video-full.gz
#
Attachments
Gnome-3.png
(135.35 KiB) Downloaded 1002 times

User avatar
oldyeller
Posts: 889
Joined: Tue 15 Nov 2011, 14:26
Location: Alaska

#18 Post by oldyeller »

I tried to download this 5 times and the last three times the size of the iso is 265 mb.

Will try again later

unless others have gotten the same size

User avatar
James C
Posts: 6618
Joined: Thu 26 Mar 2009, 05:12
Location: Kentucky

#19 Post by James C »

oldyeller wrote:I tried to download this 5 times and the last three times the size of the iso is 265 mb.

Will try again later

unless others have gotten the same size
My download was 265 mb as well ..... posting from it now.

MD5 is bf68db3c7fac5196dabd4322fed815a9

User avatar
Jejy69
Posts: 710
Joined: Thu 20 Jan 2011, 18:10
Location: Perpignan

#20 Post by Jejy69 »

Oops, I forgot the MD5, sorry ... Thanks James C.
I will put the ISO on another site for a mirror.
Hello oldyeller !

I like what you have done with 2.32

I did try and do cinnamon but I really don't know much about compiling.

I like gnome 3 as well it would be great too if this could also be done through woof. Maybe a dev would like to help you do this.

What do you think?
Thanks for your opinion ! :)

You're absolutely right, but I do not know where and who to ask, any help you can give will be welcome. :D
I'll search, good idea!

@ James C, You have successfully installed the drivers?
Personally, this has not been a success, because he gives me gnome-shell.
Is there a way to return to a Gnome Basic with the drivers installed?
I'm Commander Shepard and this is my favorite Linux distrbution on the Citadel.

Post Reply