Puppy Linux Discussion Forum Forum Index Puppy Linux Discussion Forum
Puppy HOME page : puppylinux.com
"THE" alternative forum : puppylinux.info
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

The time now is Thu 02 Oct 2014, 13:10
All times are UTC - 4
 Forum index » Taking the Puppy out for a walk » Misc
Are Applications Modified for Puppy?
Moderators: Flash, JohnMurga
Post_new_topic   Reply_to_topic View_previous_topic :: View_next_topic
Page 1 of 1 Posts_count  
Author Message
gerry

Joined: 26 Jul 2007
Posts: 946
Location: England

PostPosted: Sat 04 Aug 2012, 03:14    Post_subject:  Are Applications Modified for Puppy?  

Are applications modified in any way when included in Puppy? If so...

Debian had a row with Mozilla several years ago, because they wanted the freedom to fix problems in Firefox themselves in advance of the official fix from Mozilla. This lead to the rebranding of Firefox as Iceweasel, because Mozilla said that if you call it Firefox then it's got to BE Firefox.

Is Puppy in danger of being in the same situation with (for instance) Seamonkey? Or Abiword?

Gerry
Back to top
View user's profile Send_private_message 
Monsie


Joined: 01 Dec 2011
Posts: 633
Location: Kamloops BC Canada

PostPosted: Sat 04 Aug 2012, 06:18    Post_subject: Are Applications Modified for Puppy?  

That's an interesting question, gerry.
I am guessing it has to do in part with the difficulties you have been having with SeaMonkey in Slacko.... (I just finished reading some bits from that thread).

The short, quick answer is yes.... but not in the sense that you are talking about so, no I don't think Puppy has too much to worry about.

In terms of third party software such as browsers, any modifications done would be within the allowable parameters that are involved with compiling the source code. So, for example, I believe that SeaMonkey can be compiled so as not to include automatic updates, but someone else can confirm this... As far as I know, however, nobody within the community is re-writing browser code to take care of security issues etc, like the debian developers/maintainers. So, no, we're not in the same league as Debian.

That said, I'm sure some other members can add some meaningful bits to this discussion.

Monsie

_________________
My username is pronounced: "mun-see". Derived from my surname, it was my nickname throughout high school.
Back to top
View user's profile Send_private_message 
Lobster
Official Crustacean


Joined: 04 May 2005
Posts: 15117
Location: Paradox Realm

PostPosted: Sat 04 Aug 2012, 09:12    Post_subject:  

They may be compiled or packaged differently for example without help files, some other bloat such as themes may be stripped out.
The idea is not to modify code (that has been done for bugs) but to use the standard package as efficiently as possible. Package developers are informed of any bugs in the hope they will modify the code.
Puppy on occasion goes back to older code when newer code is unreliable or unstable or not working with Puppy components. Smile

_________________
Puppy WIKI
Back to top
View user's profile Send_private_message Visit_website 
Display_posts:   Sort by:   
Page 1 of 1 Posts_count  
Post_new_topic   Reply_to_topic View_previous_topic :: View_next_topic
 Forum index » Taking the Puppy out for a walk » Misc
Jump to:  

Rules_post_cannot
Rules_reply_cannot
Rules_edit_cannot
Rules_delete_cannot
Rules_vote_cannot
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
[ Time: 0.0432s ][ Queries: 12 (0.0035s) ][ GZIP on ]