Wary 5.3.92 (5.4beta2), Dec. 3, 2012

Please post any bugs you have found
Message
Author
User avatar
OscarTalks
Posts: 2196
Joined: Mon 06 Feb 2012, 00:58
Location: London, England

#41 Post by OscarTalks »

Sage wrote:SM in Wary requires 10.3.xx which isn't in BK's PPM list at present.
The latest version of Flash Player 10 is uploaded to ibiblio here:-

http://distro.ibiblio.org/quirky/pet_pa ... 183.23.pet

Not sure if that one will appear in PPM if you update the package lists though.

Works for me in SeaMonkey and Opera.
Oscar in England
Image

User avatar
vicmz
Posts: 1262
Joined: Sun 15 Jan 2012, 22:47

#42 Post by vicmz »

Is there a .delta file to upgrade from Wary 5.3 to Wary 5.3.90?

User avatar
peebee
Posts: 4370
Joined: Sun 21 Sep 2008, 12:31
Location: Worcestershire, UK
Contact:

#43 Post by peebee »

vicmz wrote:Is there a .delta file to upgrade from Wary 5.3 to Wary 5.3.90?
Yes - follow the links in post #1 to the delta-files directory
ImageLxPup = Puppy + LXDE
Main version used daily: LxPupSc; Assembler of UPups, ScPup & ScPup64, LxPup, LxPupSc & LxPupSc64

Sage
Posts: 5536
Joined: Tue 04 Oct 2005, 08:34
Location: GB

#44 Post by Sage »

Works for me in SeaMonkey and Opera.
Thanks Oscar - I keep a number of .pets on a USB following the advice of ??? (DaveS?), notably a 10.3.x.x and a couple of 11.x.x.x, (notably 11..2.202.228.pet). I appreciate you want to be helpful but it has proved necessary to specify the exact version of browser. Sometimes it's just quicker to try each FP until one works! Ideally, one might engage in a massive editing operation on the PPM, listing all known browsers with appropriate FPs alongside - clearly an absurd request for our hard-pressed volunteer developers. Sadly not all Forum recommendations have proved viable in my tests, so there may be an element of HW? Or finger-trouble...

User avatar
vicmz
Posts: 1262
Joined: Sun 15 Jan 2012, 22:47

#45 Post by vicmz »

peebee wrote:
vicmz wrote:Is there a .delta file to upgrade from Wary 5.3 to Wary 5.3.90?
Yes - follow the links in post #1 to the delta-files directory
Thanks, peebee :D

User avatar
FeodorF
Posts: 293
Joined: Wed 07 Jul 2010, 09:44
Location: Heidelberg, Germany

Problem with mounting an sfs-file while using Wary 5.3.90

#46 Post by FeodorF »

Question:

I'm using Wary 5.3.90 and trying to mount the puppy_racy_5.3.90.sfs file to look at it. It fails with an error message: "Failed mounting..." .

If I try it the other way round:

Using Racy 5.3.90 and trying to mount the puppy_wary_5.3.90.sfs file everything works fine. "Success!..."

What is the reason for something like this?
Attachments
Trying ToMountRacySfsFile.png
(56.51 KiB) Downloaded 1584 times

User avatar
`f00
Posts: 807
Joined: Thu 06 Nov 2008, 19:13
Location: the Western Reserve

#47 Post by `f00 »

@FeodorF
Timing is the short answer. I've noticed myself (viewing other version main sfs, especially if read from another optical disc) that a major sfs can be a trifle 'slow' to be recognised and read, I think some of it has to do with checking for compatibility (gross and fine). My rule of thumb check on the timing is to see if rox has read the properties of the sfs and then click-mount it - since I've been doing this I've rarely had a failed mount for viewing.

There's also a new-ish mssg about 'view' as opposed to installing (not too sure if that's sfs_load related however, I have shinobar's on-the-fly installed as well since it's so handy). Sry I can't doublecheck your particular since racy works so well for me that following wary isn't so practical (given the size of the iso and my dialup conn).

hth, anyway

User avatar
01micko
Posts: 8741
Joined: Sat 11 Oct 2008, 13:39
Location: qld
Contact:

#48 Post by 01micko »

FeodorF

It's maybe compression related? Racy uses xz compression where Wary can't because of the older kernel.

To test that theory you'd need to try to mount it on the command line and see what errors occur.
Puppy Linux Blog - contact me for access

User avatar
FeodorF
Posts: 293
Joined: Wed 07 Jul 2010, 09:44
Location: Heidelberg, Germany

Problem with mounting an sfs-file while using Wary 5.3.90

#49 Post by FeodorF »

Thank you `f00, thank you 01micko!

I did some more testing, by copying everything onto drive 'C'.
I`m wrong! It was drive 'sda1'! :D

@01micko

I think you are right at the money, as the /tmp/xerrs.log throws out an error message.
Attachments
WaryXerrorLog.png
(8.62 KiB) Downloaded 1453 times

User avatar
sszindian
Posts: 807
Joined: Sun 25 Apr 2010, 02:14
Location: Pennsylvania U.S.

Mplayer

#50 Post by sszindian »

Mplayer... does not display a fullscreen-picture when you go to fullscreen.

>>>---Indian------>
Cloud Computing For Every Puppy (a .pet)
[url]http://murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?t=69192[/url]

User avatar
FeodorF
Posts: 293
Joined: Wed 07 Jul 2010, 09:44
Location: Heidelberg, Germany

Re: Mplayer

#51 Post by FeodorF »

sszindian wrote:Mplayer... does not display a fullscreen-picture when you go to fullscreen.

>>>---Indian------>
Hi sszindian!

You are right, full screen doesn't work with Racy 5.3.90 ,but works fine with Wary 5.3.90 . Please try if Wary works full screen on your side too.

User avatar
James C
Posts: 6618
Joined: Thu 26 Mar 2009, 05:12
Location: Kentucky

#52 Post by James C »

Wary 5.3.90 live pfix=ram hardware test on an old box with an occasionally working hdd...... at the moment no swap.
No problems so far.

Report Video 1.3 - Fri 5 Oct 2012 on Wary Puppy 5.3.90 - Linux 2.6.32.59 i686

Chip description:
0.0 VGA compatible controller: Trident Microsystems CyberBlade/i1
oem: Copyright 1998 TRIDENT MICROSYSTEMS INC.

X Server: Xorg Driver used: trident

X.Org version: 1.3.0
dimensions: 1024x768 pixels (321x241 millimeters)
depth of root window: 24 planes


...the above also recorded in /tmp/root/ as report-video,
and archived with xorg.conf and Xorg.0.log as report-video-full.gz
# glxgears
313 frames in 6.8 seconds = 46.225 FPS
414 frames in 7.0 seconds = 59.055 FPS
414 frames in 6.4 seconds = 64.190 FPS
414 frames in 7.5 seconds = 55.191 FPS
276 frames in 5.3 seconds = 52.414 FPS
414 frames in 6.5 seconds = 63.379 FPS

-Computer-
Processor : AMD Athlon(tm) XP 1700+
Memory : 1026MB (169MB used)
Operating System : Unknown distribution
User Name : root (root)
Date/Time : Fri 05 Oct 2012 09:56:35 AM CDT
-Display-
Resolution : 1024x768 pixels
OpenGL Renderer : Mesa GLX Indirect
X11 Vendor : The X.Org Foundation
-Multimedia-
Attachments
wary 5.3.90.png
(31.14 KiB) Downloaded 1744 times

User avatar
don
Posts: 58
Joined: Tue 06 Sep 2005, 22:30
Location: Virginia, USA

Chrome and Chromium Browsers

#53 Post by don »

Will Wary and Racy ever be able to run Chrome and Chromium browsers, or is there a fundamental incompatibility impossible to resolve?

User avatar
Terryphi
Posts: 761
Joined: Wed 02 Jul 2008, 09:32
Location: West Wales, Britain.

Re: Chrome and Chromium Browsers

#54 Post by Terryphi »

don wrote:Will Wary and Racy ever be able to run Chrome and Chromium browsers, or is there a fundamental incompatibility impossible to resolve?
Racy and Wary lack the library versions required to run the latest versions of Chromium and Chrome.

However, I produced an SFS of an older version of Chromium which does work with Racy and Wary.

http://www.murga-linux.com/puppy/viewto ... 49&t=65802

Use entirely at your own risk. I no longer provide support for it.
[b]Classic Opera 12.16 browser SFS package[/b] for Precise, Slacko, Racy, Wary, Lucid, etc available[url=http://terryphillips.org.uk/operasfs.htm]here[/url] :)

User avatar
sszindian
Posts: 807
Joined: Sun 25 Apr 2010, 02:14
Location: Pennsylvania U.S.

Wary

#55 Post by sszindian »

FeodorF wrote:

You are right, full screen doesn't work with Racy 5.3.90 ,but works fine with Wary 5.3.90 . Please try if Wary works full screen on your side too.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sorry FeodorF... haven't used wary for a long, long time, earlier versions worked OK on my desktop but not very well on my old notebook so I just don't bother with it, Racy works fine on both!

>>>---Indian------>
Cloud Computing For Every Puppy (a .pet)
[url]http://murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?t=69192[/url]

User avatar
666philb
Posts: 3615
Joined: Sun 07 Feb 2010, 12:27
Location: wales ... by the sea

#56 Post by 666philb »

mplayer will go fullscreen if you install your graphic drivers
Bionicpup64 built with bionic beaver packages http://murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?t=114311
Xenialpup64, built with xenial xerus packages http://murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?t=107331

slenkar
Posts: 228
Joined: Sat 11 Jul 2009, 01:26

#57 Post by slenkar »

-Display-
Resolution : 1024x768 pixels
Vendor : The X.Org Foundation
Version : 1.3.0
-Monitors-
Monitor 0 : 1024x768 pixels
-Extensions-
BIG-REQUESTS
DAMAGE
DEC-XTRAP
DOUBLE-BUFFER
DPMS
Extended-Visual-Information
GLX
MIT-SCREEN-SAVER
MIT-SHM
MIT-SUNDRY-NONSTANDARD
RANDR
RENDER
SECURITY
SGI-GLX
SHAPE
SYNC
TOG-CUP
X-Resource
XAccessControlExtension
XC-APPGROUP
XC-MISC
XFIXES
XFree86-Bigfont
XFree86-DRI
XFree86-Misc
XFree86-VidModeExtension
XINERAMA
XInputExtension
XKEYBOARD
XTEST
XVideo
-OpenGL-
Vendor : Mesa project
Renderer : Mesa GLX Indirect
Version : 1.4 (1.5 Mesa 6.5.2)
Direct Rendering : No

(Intel 845g graphics card)

I installed the 5.3.9 wary and direct rendering was not working so I upgraded xorg, I was running seamonkey at the time and now seamonkey is deleted, trying to install seamonkey 2 from the package manager doesnt seem to work.

With the new xorg the video card works but the desktop starts as 800x600
but before 1024x768 was possible. In xorg.conf it only mentions 1024x768 not one mention of 800x600.

before the desktop starts the text seems to be at 1024x768 resolution too.

(Intel 845g graphics card)

drblock2
Posts: 153
Joined: Mon 19 Jan 2009, 12:38

Fastest Puppy ever!

#58 Post by drblock2 »

I first ran Wary 5.3.90 with my old save file from Wary 5.3.3. Imagine my surprise (delight) when my nvidia GeForce FX 5200 clocked in at 7450 fps on glxgears! This is more than twice as fast as the previous record ca. 3400 fps held by the previous Wary version.

Network setup did not work automatically and SNS refused to connect although it found the router. On reboot, however, the problem disappeared. Sound worked and I was able to setup network printing with CUPS - which I had never succeeded in doing with the older version.

For comparison, I did a new installation with pfix=ram. The nv driver was loaded and delivered glxgears 425 fps. I loaded the nvidia-base-71.86.14.pet from the PPM along with the corresponding kmodule. I downloaded sfs-load-1.9.6 with the PPM and used it to install the kernel-patch and devx files. After choosing Nvidia - nvidia with xorgwizard, I ran glxgears. Result: ca. 3450 fps. Not to worry, however. After creating a save file and rebooting, glxgears registered ca.7600 fps. (I can't imagine why creating a save file should produce this increase in performance.)

SeaMonkey and my stand-alone installation of Opera 11.02 both worked, but required the flash plug-in. I consulted the PPM and tried 10.10.15.3-w5c - which did the trick.

Tentative Conclusion: At least on my ten-year-old Athlon (2Ghz, 2 GB RAM, FX 5200), eliminating the tap dance with nouveau certainly pays off. The nv driver delivers respectable results and the PPM allows the user to upgrade to nouveau or the proprietary nvidia drivers. The strategy should be to make sure (insofar as possible) that Puppy always boots to a usable desktop and to offer an upgrade at the earliest possible opportunity.

slenkar
Posts: 228
Joined: Sat 11 Jul 2009, 01:26

#59 Post by slenkar »

Legacy OS 2 allows me to have 1024x768 resolution BTW

User avatar
Ted Dog
Posts: 3965
Joined: Wed 14 Sep 2005, 02:35
Location: Heart of Texas

Bluray boot works with this version of racy

#60 Post by Ted Dog »

Thanks back to playing with booting and running directly from a bluray disc.

also noticed oddity with remaster script if you re-master it shaves 3M from the resulting iso everything seems to be there

Post Reply