Author |
Message |
edoc

Joined: 07 Aug 2005 Posts: 4722 Location: Southeast Georgia, USA
|
Posted: Tue 06 Nov 2012, 13:55 Post subject:
|
|
I tried the other one and it worked fine - really fast!
QUESTION: Does Google control the Chromium base or is that truly independent?
How may one trust that they won't embed a back door to presumed-private area and/or suddenly terminate the open-source updates?
_________________ Thanks! David
Home page: http://nevils-station.com
Don't google Search! http://duckduckgo.com
TahrPup64 & Lighthouse64-b602 & JL64-603
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Xtanova

Joined: 06 Oct 2012 Posts: 11 Location: Egypt
|
Posted: Tue 06 Nov 2012, 15:22 Post subject:
|
|
Thanks jpeps
I use Iron browser myself because for me the chrome browser is the speediest, most friendly, yet the memory footprint is reasonable.
I guess Iron is actually forking Google Chrome, they removed the hidden services that Chrome installs. The browser size is bit large, but doesn't bloat the memory.
Iron browser Pet as compiled under Dpup Expimo 5.X.3.4.12 - size: 40MB
http://www.adrive.com/public/tHwynH/Iron-22.0.125_Dpup.pet
md5: 36cd7528cacb23baa4ce61577cb5e744
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
pemasu

Joined: 08 Jul 2009 Posts: 5484 Location: Finland
|
Posted: Tue 06 Nov 2012, 15:53 Post subject:
|
|
Thanks jpeps and Xtanova of Iron 22 sfs and pet.
I did use jpeps sfs and uploaded it to the exprimo repo.
I did strip it a little more and then I compressed it with -comp xz.
The result is now 30 Mb.
http://www.smokey01.com/pemasu/pet_packages-exprimo/iron-22.0.1250-dpup.sfs
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
jpeps
Joined: 31 May 2008 Posts: 3217
|
Posted: Tue 06 Nov 2012, 18:47 Post subject:
|
|
Great...another 3M. I didn't strip any files, but used:
mksquashfs -comp xz -noI
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
jpeps
Joined: 31 May 2008 Posts: 3217
|
Posted: Tue 06 Nov 2012, 21:10 Post subject:
|
|
I stripped...indeed, saves 3M
I just made a version for Spot (in keeping with discussion about running browsers in root). It likes to update .config prefs in root, however, so if you want to try running in Spot, initially chown the .config/iron files (e.g, startup wrapper).
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
jpeps
Joined: 31 May 2008 Posts: 3217
|
Posted: Tue 06 Nov 2012, 22:35 Post subject:
|
|
edoc wrote: |
How may one trust that they won't embed a back door to presumed-private area and/or suddenly terminate the open-source updates? |
That might be difficult if you were running the browser in Spot or user. I think this is an increasing issue with any browser.
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
linuph

Joined: 03 Jun 2012 Posts: 128 Location: Philippines
|
Posted: Sun 11 Nov 2012, 05:45 Post subject:
|
|
@pemasu
Which MPlayer version do we have in 5.X.3.4.12? MPlayer- h shows "MPlayer UNKNOWN-4.4.5". Could it be MPlayer2?
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
pemasu

Joined: 08 Jul 2009 Posts: 5484 Location: Finland
|
Posted: Sun 11 Nov 2012, 07:10 Post subject:
|
|
Mplayer is recent. It has been compiled from svn....after 1.1 was released. So...it is as new as it can be...with some modified options though. For example it uses my compiled external ffmpeg instead of internal libs.
It is Mplayer, not Mplayer2. When you compile from svn, the version information is sometimes obscure, as you noticed.
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
linuph

Joined: 03 Jun 2012 Posts: 128 Location: Philippines
|
Posted: Sun 11 Nov 2012, 09:36 Post subject:
|
|
Thanks, pemasu. Similarly, what is the version of ffmpeg. --version shows "N-42316-gd3f4d7"
I'm looking to burn subtitles into video and would need ffmpeg libass for that which is not compiled into this version. I understand that I will run into trouble with this MPlayer version if I replace ffmpeg?
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
pemasu

Joined: 08 Jul 2009 Posts: 5484 Location: Finland
|
Posted: Sun 11 Nov 2012, 10:04 Post subject:
|
|
ffmpeg is basically 0.11.1. I compiled it from git after 0.11.1 was released.
I think that I compiled mplayer with libass support and I also included bluray support.
I dont remember if there is libass configure option for ffmpeg and was that included. Probably not.
Yep. Replacing Mplayer with version which has ffmpeg libs compiled in is needed.
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
jpeps
Joined: 31 May 2008 Posts: 3217
|
Posted: Sun 11 Nov 2012, 12:39 Post subject:
|
|
pemasu wrote: | ffmpeg is basically 0.11.1. I compiled it from git after 0.11.1 was released.
|
ah...version "happiness", which succeeds freedom, harmony, love, and peace. Now we have "Angel," so I suppose we're now into the afterlife. Maybe they should have taken android's cue of using desserts, since there are more possibilities prior to death.
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
edoc

Joined: 07 Aug 2005 Posts: 4722 Location: Southeast Georgia, USA
|
Posted: Sun 11 Nov 2012, 13:39 Post subject:
|
|
I call eclairs with white chocolate on top rather than dark chocolate!
Or maybe oatmeal cookies with walnuts & cranberries.
Or ... never mind ... have to go find a snack now ...
_________________ Thanks! David
Home page: http://nevils-station.com
Don't google Search! http://duckduckgo.com
TahrPup64 & Lighthouse64-b602 & JL64-603
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
edoc

Joined: 07 Aug 2005 Posts: 4722 Location: Southeast Georgia, USA
|
Posted: Tue 13 Nov 2012, 18:31 Post subject:
Open SWP Project - Shumway? |
|
Anyone following the Open SWP Project - Shumway?
https://blog.mozilla.org/research/2012/11/12/introducing-the-shumway-open-swf-runtime-project/
_________________ Thanks! David
Home page: http://nevils-station.com
Don't google Search! http://duckduckgo.com
TahrPup64 & Lighthouse64-b602 & JL64-603
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
anikin
Joined: 10 May 2012 Posts: 982
|
Posted: Wed 21 Nov 2012, 10:20 Post subject:
Iconless menu |
|
Can't resist the urge to show off a little accomplishment of mine. Dpup Exprimo menu without icons and new "old" shutdown menu. Pure text and nothing more. Initially I only planned to revert the shutdown menu to its original layout, like in Precise, but ended up with a completely new menu.
Description |
|
Filesize |
34.29 KB |
Viewed |
1236 Time(s) |

|
Description |
|
Filesize |
16.59 KB |
Viewed |
1260 Time(s) |

|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
edoc

Joined: 07 Aug 2005 Posts: 4722 Location: Southeast Georgia, USA
|
Posted: Wed 21 Nov 2012, 11:15 Post subject:
|
|
Did you do this:
a) Because you could
b) To save resources
c) You prefer the look
d) All of the above
e) None of the above
_________________ Thanks! David
Home page: http://nevils-station.com
Don't google Search! http://duckduckgo.com
TahrPup64 & Lighthouse64-b602 & JL64-603
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
|