| Author |
Message |
fischer22
Joined: 30 Dec 2012 Posts: 3
|
Posted: Sun 30 Dec 2012, 14:19 Post subject:
Live USB vs Frugal Installation |
|
Sorry that I'm asking such a simple question, but I couldn't find an easy to understand answer out there. So, if anyone can/wants to help me:
What is the difference (in performance, space used, etc, but without going into detail, just the basics so I get the picture) between running Puppy Linux from a Live USB Flash drive, or running it from a USB Flash Drive with a frugal install?
Thanks in advance!
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
rcrsn51

Joined: 05 Sep 2006 Posts: 7748 Location: Stratford, Ontario
|
Posted: Sun 30 Dec 2012, 14:45 Post subject:
|
|
Read here for an explanation of full versus frugal.
A USB setup IS frugal because it just contains the core Puppy files.
You need to explain what you mean by "Live USB vs Frugal Installation".
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Bligh
Joined: 08 Jan 2006 Posts: 454 Location: California
|
Posted: Sun 30 Dec 2012, 14:57 Post subject:
|
|
Installing to usb might be preferable to installing to compressed ntfs. I don't have first hand experience at either. I have always used save files.
Cheers
Edit: I have always booted Puppy from cd.
Last edited by Bligh on Sun 30 Dec 2012, 15:19; edited 1 time in total
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
fischer22
Joined: 30 Dec 2012 Posts: 3
|
Posted: Sun 30 Dec 2012, 14:59 Post subject:
|
|
By "live USB" i mean using, for example, unetbootin to create from the puupy .iso a bootable USB flash drive, and running it just like that.
From frugal install I mean this:
http://puppylinux.org/main/Puppy430-tutorial-English.pdf
Slides 21 to 33.
I hope this makes my question easier to understand.
Thanks!
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
rcrsn51

Joined: 05 Sep 2006 Posts: 7748 Location: Stratford, Ontario
|
Posted: Sun 30 Dec 2012, 15:43 Post subject:
|
|
Both methods are doing the same thing - creating a bootable Puppy USB drive
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
fischer22
Joined: 30 Dec 2012 Posts: 3
|
Posted: Sun 30 Dec 2012, 16:14 Post subject:
|
|
Oh... reading those instructions (me, beginner in all of this) made it look like it was a somehow more "complete" or "full" install, relatively speaking.
Thank you for clarifying this for me
Happy new year!
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
|