Sorry that I'm asking such a simple question, but I couldn't find an easy to understand answer out there. So, if anyone can/wants to help me:
What is the difference (in performance, space used, etc, but without going into detail, just the basics so I get the picture) between running Puppy Linux from a Live USB Flash drive, or running it from a USB Flash Drive with a frugal install?
Thanks in advance!
Live USB vs Frugal Installation
Installing to usb might be preferable to installing to compressed ntfs. I don't have first hand experience at either. I have always used save files.
Cheers
Edit: I have always booted Puppy from cd.
Cheers
Edit: I have always booted Puppy from cd.
Last edited by Bligh on Sun 30 Dec 2012, 19:19, edited 1 time in total.
By "live USB" i mean using, for example, unetbootin to create from the puupy .iso a bootable USB flash drive, and running it just like that.
From frugal install I mean this:
http://puppylinux.org/main/Puppy430-tut ... nglish.pdf
Slides 21 to 33.
I hope this makes my question easier to understand.
Thanks!
From frugal install I mean this:
http://puppylinux.org/main/Puppy430-tut ... nglish.pdf
Slides 21 to 33.
I hope this makes my question easier to understand.
Thanks!