Puppy Linux Discussion Forum Forum Index Puppy Linux Discussion Forum
Puppy HOME page : puppylinux.com
"THE" alternative forum : puppylinux.info
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

The time now is Thu 02 Oct 2014, 08:28
All times are UTC - 4
 Forum index » Advanced Topics » Puppy Projects
possible puppy performance boost even more using upx?
Moderators: Flash, JohnMurga
Post_new_topic   Reply_to_topic View_previous_topic :: View_next_topic
Page 1 of 1 Posts_count  
Author Message
Anniekin


Joined: 24 Feb 2009
Posts: 186

PostPosted: Fri 11 Jan 2013, 00:08    Post_subject:  possible puppy performance boost even more using upx?
Sub_title: ultimate packer for executables
 

possible puppy performance boost even more using upx?

https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=4924

ultimate packer for executables
Back to top
View user's profile Send_private_message 
DPUP5520

Joined: 16 Feb 2011
Posts: 801

PostPosted: Fri 11 Jan 2013, 00:27    Post_subject:  

UPX has been being used for years here for certain packages. A simple search will turn up multiple threads including a GUI.
_________________
PupRescue 2.5
Puppy Crypt 528
Back to top
View user's profile Send_private_message 
Iguleder


Joined: 11 Aug 2009
Posts: 1907
Location: Israel, somewhere in the beautiful desert

PostPosted: Sat 12 Jan 2013, 08:43    Post_subject:  

Packers are bad. FACE IT.

Packers might make executables smaller but increase their startup time (e.g when you run them, it takes time to unpack their sections).

In the case of Puppy, it's an extremely bad idea to use UPX. Since Puppy's SFS is compressed, the compression benefit of UPX is gone, so you gain just the slow startup speed (and increased memory usage), without the benefit of small size on-disk.

In the case of PETs (and stuff that isn't part of a compressed file system), you still have those disadvantages.

Also, smaller executables aren't less resource-hungry in many cases. In this case, for example, they're the exact opposite. Idea

_________________
My homepage
Back to top
View user's profile Send_private_message Visit_website MSNM 
ICQ 
Display_posts:   Sort by:   
Page 1 of 1 Posts_count  
Post_new_topic   Reply_to_topic View_previous_topic :: View_next_topic
 Forum index » Advanced Topics » Puppy Projects
Jump to:  

Rules_post_cannot
Rules_reply_cannot
Rules_edit_cannot
Rules_delete_cannot
Rules_vote_cannot
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
[ Time: 0.0495s ][ Queries: 12 (0.0115s) ][ GZIP on ]