Author |
Message |
simargl
Guest
|
Posted: Wed 16 Jan 2013, 11:25 Post subject:
|
|
bark_bark_bark wrote: | Just don't break the kernel like you did with the 3.6.8 kernel. |
Hmm.. wise guy? And very optimistic if you think that, I care about YOUR problems!
Last edited by simargl on Wed 16 Jan 2013, 11:36; edited 2 times in total
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
stifiling
Joined: 29 Dec 2007 Posts: 388
|
Posted: Wed 16 Jan 2013, 11:31 Post subject:
|
|
This distro needs a thread on the Arch Linux forums as well. because there's 'no way' they won't find it useful.
Last edited by stifiling on Wed 16 Jan 2013, 11:43; edited 1 time in total
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
bark_bark_bark
Joined: 05 Jun 2012 Posts: 1935 Location: Wisconsin USA
|
Posted: Wed 16 Jan 2013, 11:36 Post subject:
|
|
whoa.. no need to be hostile, bro. I just want to have your puppy become better (as well as stable). I could help by testing the ISO before release though. I don't care which kernel you use (as long as it's from January 2012 or newer). I want to make sure the kernel is fully stable, but I have confidence in the fact that kernel compile errors are less likely to happen for the next version.
i know in pre-ArchPup 12.12.x that broadcom devices worked, but they don't in that version because of kernel-related errors.
Anyways I will be happy to help your Puppy become a success. Don't let that post fool you into thinking it was 100% your fault that the kernel was broken, the kernel sources itself is to blame too. (I know because I've done some test compilations of kernels.)
Remember think proudly about your puplet. I think it's very unique. I would recommend it to anyone who want to switch from arch to Puppy.
Just keep experimenting, it will pay off.
EDIT: You may think you know what my problems are, but you don't and you never will.
_________________ ....
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
mavrothal

Joined: 24 Aug 2009 Posts: 2964
|
Posted: Wed 16 Jan 2013, 12:51 Post subject:
|
|
simargl wrote: | Also I'm thinking to replace thunar + pup-volume-monitor with spacefm. |
That may be a ggod idea. Mostly because I _think_ that the patched glib required for pup-volume-monitor gives problems
simargl wrote: | so maybe I will use 3.4.25 or latest from that series, it was updated 2013-01-1 |
Wise.
Also calimero's kernels and ausf-utils suggested by cinclus_cinclus below may be a good idea. Did you check if their config matches yours?
(is always a good idea to follow "upstreams". Less work for you )
bark_bark_bark wrote: |
Aufs is a joke to me. Plus the SFS files used by puppy aren't Aufs, they're SquashFS 4.x format (Puppy 3/4 used v3). |
You do not have a clue what aufs is. Do you?...
_________________ == Here is how to solve your Linux problems fast ==
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
bark_bark_bark
Joined: 05 Jun 2012 Posts: 1935 Location: Wisconsin USA
|
Posted: Wed 16 Jan 2013, 12:55 Post subject:
|
|
I know what Aufs is, I just think it sucks.
_________________ ....
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
mavrothal

Joined: 24 Aug 2009 Posts: 2964
|
Posted: Wed 16 Jan 2013, 13:26 Post subject:
|
|
bark_bark_bark wrote: | I know what Aufs is, I just think it sucks. |
I see.
And what your preferred layered filesystem would be? (and why?)
_________________ == Here is how to solve your Linux problems fast ==
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
bark_bark_bark
Joined: 05 Jun 2012 Posts: 1935 Location: Wisconsin USA
|
Posted: Wed 16 Jan 2013, 13:30 Post subject:
|
|
Aufs is not a layered FS, but I'll just deal with it's existence for now.
_________________ ....
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
mavrothal

Joined: 24 Aug 2009 Posts: 2964
|
Posted: Wed 16 Jan 2013, 13:41 Post subject:
|
|
bark_bark_bark wrote: | Aufs is not a layered FS |
Is not?
How would you characterize it then?
_________________ == Here is how to solve your Linux problems fast ==
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
pemasu

Joined: 08 Jul 2009 Posts: 5484 Location: Finland
|
Posted: Wed 16 Jan 2013, 13:49 Post subject:
|
|
http://aufs.sourceforge.net/
Quote: | Aufs3 -- advanced multi layered unification filesystem version 3.x
http://aufs.sf.net
Junjiro R. Okajima |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
bark_bark_bark
Joined: 05 Jun 2012 Posts: 1935 Location: Wisconsin USA
|
Posted: Wed 16 Jan 2013, 14:08 Post subject:
|
|
oh wow thank you for the clarifaction.
_________________ ....
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
mavrothal

Joined: 24 Aug 2009 Posts: 2964
|
Posted: Wed 16 Jan 2013, 14:22 Post subject:
|
|
pemasu,
you are not fun at all...
_________________ == Here is how to solve your Linux problems fast ==
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
simargl
Guest
|
Posted: Wed 16 Jan 2013, 17:04 Post subject:
|
|
For new release there will be 3 sfs files in main iso:
archpup-132.sfs (core + Xorg)
adrv-132.sfs (openbox+thunar+geany)
archapps-132.sfs (qt firefox and everything else)
If for example archpup-132.sfs need some fixing I can after upload only that file not the whole iso.
development files from archpup-132.sfs will be moved to archdev.sfs, but
adrv and archapps will be self-containable -> nothing will be splitted , that is only right way
Adequate photo
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
darkcity

Joined: 23 May 2010 Posts: 2545 Location: near here
|
Posted: Wed 16 Jan 2013, 17:57 Post subject:
|
|
this is my system-
_________________ helping Wiki for help
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
mavrothal

Joined: 24 Aug 2009 Posts: 2964
|
Posted: Thu 17 Jan 2013, 01:53 Post subject:
|
|
simargl wrote: |
mounting cd-rom, dvd, and usb fat-32 formatted all works
but mounting internal hard disk drive (ntfs or ext4), failed with something like 'specify partition type error'
In devices list in spacefm are shown mount loop files, I couldn't disable that.
Interesting is that usb devices are handled properly with spacefm but they don't show at all in thunar without restarting pup-volume-monitor.
If I am able to fix problems with mounting internal disk and hiding loop devices, this could easily replace thunar and pup-volume-monitor. |
To remove loop files I added this to /root/.config/spacefm/session*
Code: | dev_show_hide_volumes-s=-/dev/loop0 -/dev/loop1 -/dev/loop2 -/dev/loop3 -/dev/loop4 -/dev/loop5 # etc |
Like you I had problem mounting internal drives but also USB srives (ext or fat). It says "no mount program was found" and asks for udisks a 3+MB download.
Maybe a custom command to use pmount...
_________________ == Here is how to solve your Linux problems fast ==
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
simargl
Guest
|
Posted: Thu 17 Jan 2013, 04:31 Post subject:
|
|
mavrothal wrote: | Like you I had problem mounting internal drives but also USB srives (ext or fat). It says "no mount program was found" and asks for udisks a 3+MB download.
Maybe a custom command to use pmount... |
It works also with udevil, only that drives are mounted to /run/root/* instead of /mnt/.
Maybe make custom script apmount with options mount and unmount and call that from spacefm.
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
|