How to find all PCs in the LAN? (Solved)
-
- Posts: 1045
- Joined: Mon 26 Nov 2007, 22:07
- Location: Blomberg / Germany
How to find all PCs in the LAN? (Solved)
hi,
i wand find all ips of all PCs in the LAN (windows and Puppy-PCs).
how can i do that?
lameSMBxplorer will not work because gtkdialog.
is there a other way?
Edit:
-------------------------------------------------------
The script "check_ip.tar.gz" from voychik works perfectly!
Thank you very much!
Greetings
Wolfgang
i wand find all ips of all PCs in the LAN (windows and Puppy-PCs).
how can i do that?
lameSMBxplorer will not work because gtkdialog.
is there a other way?
Edit:
-------------------------------------------------------
The script "check_ip.tar.gz" from voychik works perfectly!
Thank you very much!
Greetings
Wolfgang
Last edited by der-schutzhund on Sun 03 Mar 2013, 12:50, edited 2 times in total.
Re: find all pcs in the lan
You can only "see" machines that are running some kind of service that advertises its presence on the network. That might be a CUPS print server or a Windows/Samba share.der-schutzhund wrote:i wand find all ips of all PCs in the LAN (windows and Puppy-PCs).how can i do that?
Run PeasyPort and scan your network for ports 631 or 139.
- Iguleder
- Posts: 2026
- Joined: Tue 11 Aug 2009, 09:36
- Location: Israel, somewhere in the beautiful desert
- Contact:
Code: Select all
arp -a
rcrsn51, you're talking about the application layer, while the arp protocol is in the data link layer of the OSI model.
[url=http://dimakrasner.com/]My homepage[/url]
[url=https://github.com/dimkr]My GitHub profile[/url]
[url=https://github.com/dimkr]My GitHub profile[/url]
There is LAN IP checker
http://www.murga-linux.com/puppy/viewto ... 682#426682
http://www.murga-linux.com/puppy/viewto ... 682#426682
[b]Carolina:[/b] [url=http://smokey01.com/carolina/pages/recent-repo.html]Recent Repository Additions[/url]
[img]https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/s/ahfade8q4def1lq/signbot.gif[/img]
[img]https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/s/ahfade8q4def1lq/signbot.gif[/img]
Dear guys,
Thanks for reminding me of that old script. I just revised it and have used arp-scan. The time taken for scanning 255 addresses is now about 1 or 2 seconds I have included the arp-scan binary (stripped and UPX'd) in this archive (compiled on Lucid). Because the source is relatively large (some 450k), I am just giving the link:
http://www.nta-monitor.com/tools-resour ... s/arp-scan.
Have fun,
vovchik
PS. I have noticed a few "timeout" issues with arp-scan and wireless, so you might what to play with the "-t" parameter - increasing it, say, from the default of 100 ms to 300 ms.
Thanks for reminding me of that old script. I just revised it and have used arp-scan. The time taken for scanning 255 addresses is now about 1 or 2 seconds I have included the arp-scan binary (stripped and UPX'd) in this archive (compiled on Lucid). Because the source is relatively large (some 450k), I am just giving the link:
http://www.nta-monitor.com/tools-resour ... s/arp-scan.
Have fun,
vovchik
PS. I have noticed a few "timeout" issues with arp-scan and wireless, so you might what to play with the "-t" parameter - increasing it, say, from the default of 100 ms to 300 ms.
- Attachments
-
- check_ip.tar.gz
- (59.84 KiB) Downloaded 1017 times
I tried arp in Slacko:
Code: Select all
# arp -a
bash: arp: command not found
#
Dear Flash,
Because arp is missing from my distribution (Lucid), I compiled arp-scan (above attachment). Arp-scan does not have any non-Puppy dependencies and is lightning fast. Try it out, taking pemasu's and my observations about -t and --interface into account. It works nicely.
With kind regards,
vovchik
Because arp is missing from my distribution (Lucid), I compiled arp-scan (above attachment). Arp-scan does not have any non-Puppy dependencies and is lightning fast. Try it out, taking pemasu's and my observations about -t and --interface into account. It works nicely.
With kind regards,
vovchik
-
- Posts: 1045
- Joined: Mon 26 Nov 2007, 22:07
- Location: Blomberg / Germany
Hi voychik,
The script works perfectly!
Thank you very much!
Greetings
Wolfgang
The script works perfectly!
Thank you very much!
Greetings
Wolfgang
vovchik wrote:Dear guys,
Thanks for reminding me of that old script. I just revised it and have used arp-scan. The time taken for scanning 255 addresses is now about 1 or 2 seconds I have included the arp-scan binary (stripped and UPX'd) in this archive (compiled on Lucid). Because the source is relatively large (some 450k), I am just giving the link:
http://www.nta-monitor.com/tools-resour ... s/arp-scan.
Have fun,
vovchik
PS. I have noticed a few "timeout" issues with arp-scan and wireless, so you might what to play with the "-t" parameter - increasing it, say, from the default of 100 ms to 300 ms.
chk_ip .pet
Beautiful work vovchik!vovchik wrote:Dear guys,
Thanks for reminding me of that old script. I just revised it and have used arp-scan. The time taken for scanning 255 addresses is now about 1 or 2 seconds I have included the arp-scan binary (stripped and UPX'd) in this archive (compiled on Lucid). Because the source is relatively large (some 450k), I am just giving the link:
http://www.nta-monitor.com/tools-resour ... s/arp-scan.
Have fun,
vovchik
PS. I have noticed a few "timeout" issues with arp-scan and wireless, so you might what to play with the "-t" parameter - increasing it, say, from the default of 100 ms to 300 ms.
I have taken the liberty of building a .pet with your package. Menu entry is on the Network menu. Tested (briefly) in Wary, Racy, Slacko and Precise. Worked great in all of them.
Thanks for this, J
- Attachments
-
- check_network_ip-0.1.pet
- Uses vovchick's script to find all PC's on LAN
- (61.32 KiB) Downloaded 1059 times
Dear jrb,
Thanks for the packaging job. Works nicely. Seeing this thread, I realized that the script might be useful since I now also have a netbook, a smartphone a tablet and two PCs, in addition to two routers and an inet-connected DVB-S receiver. Back in the old days, things were simpler, and I used to use static IPs. And now there are things such as smart TVs, internet radio players and watches.
In view of the above, It might be a good idea to include devices names, too, just to avoid confusion. I'll give that a little think and see whether that can't be done without introducing unacceptable delays in the scan.
With kind regards,
vovcghik
Thanks for the packaging job. Works nicely. Seeing this thread, I realized that the script might be useful since I now also have a netbook, a smartphone a tablet and two PCs, in addition to two routers and an inet-connected DVB-S receiver. Back in the old days, things were simpler, and I used to use static IPs. And now there are things such as smart TVs, internet radio players and watches.
In view of the above, It might be a good idea to include devices names, too, just to avoid confusion. I'll give that a little think and see whether that can't be done without introducing unacceptable delays in the scan.
With kind regards,
vovcghik