Lupu or Precise??

Booting, installing, newbie
Post Reply
Message
Author
Barkingmad
Posts: 156
Joined: Fri 21 Nov 2008, 17:20

Lupu or Precise??

#1 Post by Barkingmad »

Hello

As the title -- which to choose to install for someone else to use so can't really try them both for a while as I would for myself.

I'll try them both as a live boot to test hardware detection etc but what is peoples opinion as to stability/buginess, longer term support, availability of extra programmes etc.

I know these are matters of opinion but I'd still like to here some views to help me make a more informed choice.

Thanks

User avatar
Terryphi
Posts: 761
Joined: Wed 02 Jul 2008, 09:32
Location: West Wales, Britain.

#2 Post by Terryphi »

Both are excellent but if long-term support is your main concern I suggest Precise because it is compatible with the latest Ubuntu LTS version libraries.
[b]Classic Opera 12.16 browser SFS package[/b] for Precise, Slacko, Racy, Wary, Lucid, etc available[url=http://terryphillips.org.uk/operasfs.htm]here[/url] :)

User avatar
Dean
Posts: 46
Joined: Thu 03 Dec 2009, 13:15
Location: UK

#3 Post by Dean »

Terryphi wrote:Both are excellent but if long-term support is your main concern I suggest Precise because it is compatible with the latest Ubuntu LTS version libraries.
This.
------------
[b]HP 510 Notebook[/b] CPU 1.4 GHz Pentium M / RAM 2GB / 15.4" WXGA BrightView 1280 x 800 / 40GB HD / OS Manjaro 0.8.8

simargl

#4 Post by simargl »

.
Last edited by simargl on Sun 01 Sep 2013, 14:39, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Sky Aisling
Posts: 1368
Joined: Sat 27 Jun 2009, 23:02
Location: Port Townsend, WA. USA

Lupu or Precise??

#5 Post by Sky Aisling »

You might want to consider the make and age of your friend's machine.
I run the Lupu series on older machines.
So far, I've had good luck.

Barkingmad
Posts: 156
Joined: Fri 21 Nov 2008, 17:20

#6 Post by Barkingmad »

Hello

You might want to consider the make and age
It's a Dell -- 1.8GHz P4, Intel 845 based mainboard and 2GB ram. Would this be reckoned old in Puppy years? :D

I was thinking of using the retro kernal version if I went for Precise.

Thanks for the input

W

User avatar
Sky Aisling
Posts: 1368
Joined: Sat 27 Jun 2009, 23:02
Location: Port Townsend, WA. USA

Lupu or Precise??

#7 Post by Sky Aisling »

Hello Barkingmad,

Maybe this is your friend's machine?.

You could burn a few Live CD's of various Puppies and give them a try.

Look here for latest Puppy downloads.

I've had good luck with Lucid Puppy-528.005 on older machines.
Playing around with them on the machine is really the best way to go.
If the machine is really old (pre 2002) I've found that Puppy 4.3.1 frugally installed and with the Seamonkey browser upgraded and Shinobar's GetFlash added works fine for a user who only wants to surf the web and get email.
Ask your friend what she/he wants from the OS. Taylor your choice from there.
Enjoy!

Barkingmad
Posts: 156
Joined: Fri 21 Nov 2008, 17:20

#8 Post by Barkingmad »

Thank you

The PC is a Dell Optiplex -- same spec as that review but in a compact desktop case.

It's running 4.3.1 at the moment but could do with a newer browser and I thought would benifit from the i686 code in Lupu and later so I'll try some things out when I can.

Thanks again

Will

raffy
Posts: 4798
Joined: Wed 25 May 2005, 12:20
Location: Manila

non-PAE

#9 Post by raffy »

Your machine shall "fly" with any Puppy version. Just avoid the PAE builds.
Puppy user since Oct 2004. Want FreeOffice? [url=http://puppylinux.info/topic/freeoffice-2012-sfs]Get the sfs (English only)[/url].

Javelin Dan
Posts: 121
Joined: Tue 28 Dec 2010, 17:16
Location: Akron, Ohio

#10 Post by Javelin Dan »

All I can tell you is that I have run both on an old Dell Inspiron 8000 laptop (750Ghz. Pentium III processor, 20 GB hard drive, 512 MB RAM). Both run extremely well with ONE glaring difference: Youtube videos on Precise (and just about everything else) run like a slide-show on this computer. On Lucid 5.2.8, they actually run like a video. I don’t know what makes the difference and it may be hardware specific, but Lucid 5.2.8 runs better on this old junk than anything I’ve ever tried including several versions of Wary, some Pup versions based on older kernels, and “cut down

User avatar
Sky Aisling
Posts: 1368
Joined: Sat 27 Jun 2009, 23:02
Location: Port Townsend, WA. USA

Lupu or Precise??

#11 Post by Sky Aisling »

The Dell Optiplex is a bit older machine.
You say:
It's running 4.3.1 at the moment but could do with a newer browser and I thought would benifit from the i686 code in Lupu and later...
Puppy 4.3.1 with it's older kernel is an appropriate choice for that Dell.
You can upgrade the older Seamonkey 1.1.8 browser from within 4.3.1. and, you can add Shinobar's GetFlash to improve the Youtube viewing.
To upgrade the Seamonkey open the *help* area of the browser from the top menu bar. Look for *updates* or similiar words.
The upgrade is quick and places the new browser as the default.

Shinobar's latest *getflash* pet is here

Again, it all depends on what your friend wants to do with the Puppy.
If speed, playing net games, downloading high density files and doing multitasking is what your friend wants then you are better off encouraging your friend to get a newer machine and newer Puppy.
If simple web browsing and emailing and enjoying a Youtube video on occassion is your friend's want then 4.3.1 works well on that Dell.

Puppy 4.3.1 can be *dressed up* just as all the other Puppies can.
You might be "throwing-the-baby-out-with-the-bath-water" by dumping 4.3.1.
For fun, you might want to change the choices of wallpaper by inserting new wallpaper images into (/usr/share/backgrounds)and changing the desktop icons (menu/desktop/icon switcher) and choosing a new theme so the desktop looks fresher.
Google = Google Images *free wallpaper (put in the monitor resolution size)*. Choose carefully, some eyecandy has stealth spam built in.
And, walla! a new Puppy?

As Raffy says,
Your machine shall "fly" with any Puppy version. Just avoid the PAE builds.
Enjoy!

Post Reply