Announcing the OBVIOUS: Puppy, Replacement - WinXP/Vista/7/8

News, happenings
Message
Author
jamesbond
Posts: 3433
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007, 05:02
Location: The Blue Marble

#21 Post by jamesbond »

john biles wrote:While it would be nice to think Android will bring a Linux Desktop to the masses it won't. Android = Google not Linux in their minds.
It is true today. It wasn't like that in the past. When Android first came, most of the buyers were tech geeks who were excited with "the new Linux phone". Well that excitement didn't last long (remember how sh**y is Android 1.x?), but the initial sales drive was enough for Android (and Google's) name to gain mindshare and combined with the right strategy, catapulted Android to what it is today.

Today, many don't know that, and don't want to know. All they see is a flashy shiny phone - who cares if it runs Linux or not.
Android is that mobile phone Apple is aways suing. Did you know that Google is slowly replacing its default Open Source apps on Android with proprietary versions.
Correct, more and more apps now depends on services provided "Google Play Services" which isn't open source. Try uninstalling that service (if possible at all) and see whether the default apps still work.
By making Linux free it has no real value.
The problem is that this is a wrong perception. Linux is given away freely, without cost, yes, and with almost all freedom to tinker with it (GPLv2 four freedoms). But making or developing Linux is *not* free and in fact it is very expensive. Many people still think that Linux is developed by hobbyist - well, some of the *distros* are - but the development of Linux (the kernel) is all done *highly-paid professional experts* by tech industry giants. Don't believe me? Look at this: http://arstechnica.com/information-tech ... tributors/. While "none" tops the list, try to sum-up the contributions from all others - it will be more than 50%, in fact, close to 60%. This is just the kernel, now if you combine stuff like Xorg, X toolkits (GTK, Qt), desktop environments ... you'll what I mean.

The fact that someone gives you a gold watch for free doesn't make the watch worthless. In fact, it is probably the opposite. But yes, I agree - many people simply don't see this (or don't care).
Just remember "Nothing in this world is free" so the slogan goes.
How true, see my previous comment.
Free is working against it.
Agreed - this is our mentality. Example: Some places now charge "tickets" for a supposedly free event. If it is free people will just book the event, but then don't bother to come because well - it's free, there is no consequence. Even if the tickets is $2 or $5 it will make a lot of difference in people's mind (and the event's turnout, for that matter).
Fatdog64 forum links: [url=http://murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?t=117546]Latest version[/url] | [url=https://cutt.ly/ke8sn5H]Contributed packages[/url] | [url=https://cutt.ly/se8scrb]ISO builder[/url]

goingnuts
Posts: 932
Joined: Sun 07 Dec 2008, 13:33
Contact:

#22 Post by goingnuts »

Maybe a "How-To-Migrate-From-XP-To-Puppy" could address getting new users with already present stuff?
* Export mails from Outlook Express & import in Puppy email client
* Export Bookmarks from XP browser & import in Puppy web browser
* Which Puppy to choose
* Installing MS Office in Puppy
* Setting up shared internet connection in Puppy

etc.

We might also consider an application that replaces the XP updater. Some folks find confidence in the updater telling them frequently that updates are available = you are taken care of... :roll: Promoting bug-fixes as a free customer-service is a brilliant marketing invention...

zaivala
Posts: 125
Joined: Mon 21 Mar 2011, 07:14

#23 Post by zaivala »

gcmartin wrote:Also, @John is right that we have not always been met with acceptance. But, some of us have had successes to show. What is needed as he correctly points is some method of marketing that would "announce" Puppy distros as a reasonable alternative to REPLACE the slower and out of date XP.

This is where Puppyland shines in the alternatives offered!
The main problem with proposing Puppy as the alternative is... the potential user would look up the forum and see that Barry Kauler has "retired". Yes, we have quite a community, but it is fractured between many many different Puppies. It would take a Mark Shuttleworth type with, as was stated above, Millions and millions of $$$ and long-term commitment. All the puppies I am aware of are being run by hobbyists.

The second problem is endemic in Puppy itself -- Puppy is, by and large, focused on old, out-of-date computers, making them run like new ones. Not a selling point for an operating system for new computers.

In my case, I have a new one (and Puppies before 5.7 would not run on it, so very glad Barry retired after making this)... the UEFI garbage just messed me over, and I already knew about Puppy and it seemed the perfect solution.

nooby
Posts: 10369
Joined: Sun 29 Jun 2008, 19:05
Location: SwedenEurope

#24 Post by nooby »

I like what cimarron writes
One big advantage of Linux is that there isn't much of a malware threat.
But isn't that primarily because the market share is so small?
I trust that is the case indeed. If enough users would make use of Linux
the more money there would be in hacking them and installing
malware that log their bank accounts or set up man in the middle things

Or make use of the computer tor to halt the servers of companies
and then tell them that if the pay they get back the traffic capacity.

Linux for ordinary surfing and email and such are still too few
for the criminals to see the money in it.
I use Google Search on Puppy Forum
not an ideal solution though

wanderer
Posts: 1098
Joined: Sat 20 Oct 2007, 23:17

windoze alternative

#25 Post by wanderer »

i have just loaded puppy 217 on my win 8 laptop works fine. Had to disable secure boot and change the boot order. So now, in my book, puppy is ok on win 98 xp 7 and 8. haven't messed with wireless, wired internet worked at least up to 7. didnt try it yet on 8. so with wine and a good browser/media player puppy is an adequate alternative to windows until they come up with more garbage.

wanderer

nancy reagan
Posts: 544
Joined: Thu 22 Jan 2009, 14:20

User unfriendly

#26 Post by nancy reagan »

Only talks about what TECHNICALLY is possible.

Nobody seems to realize how difficult it will be for an XP user to get used to Linux, especially Puppy.

Talks about mounting, symlinking, kernels, PPM, quickpet etc.

And changing the desktop lookalike XP does not change that.

Should one venture to make a "userfriendly one" he will have to take the time to sit down with an XP-er. Ask him "what would you like to do ?".

Go about ...

Then he probably will be lost immeditately.

"Word ? O yes Abiword (never heard of ?). "Save" your work ? oh yes".

From there the explaining will have to start.

I am afraid it is waste of time trying to convert Window users.

jpeps
Posts: 3179
Joined: Sat 31 May 2008, 19:00

Re: User unfriendly

#27 Post by jpeps »

nancy reagan wrote:
I am afraid it is waste of time trying to convert Window users.
+1

Of course it is; it just gives devotees something to talk about.

zaivala
Posts: 125
Joined: Mon 21 Mar 2011, 07:14

Re: windoze alternative

#28 Post by zaivala »

wanderer wrote:i have just loaded puppy 217 on my win 8 laptop works fine. Had to disable secure boot and change the boot order. So now, in my book, puppy is ok on win 98 xp 7 and 8. haven't messed with wireless, wired internet worked at least up to 7. didnt try it yet on 8. so with wine and a good browser/media player puppy is an adequate alternative to windows until they come up with more garbage.

wanderer
Puppy 217? Most of us are running 5.x.x... 5.7.1 is the latest (that I know of) and I'm running it on my UEFI machine.

User avatar
john biles
Posts: 1458
Joined: Sun 17 Sep 2006, 14:05
Location: Australia
Contact:

#29 Post by john biles »

Puppy 217? Most of us are running 5.x.x... 5.7.1 is the latest (that I know of) and I'm running it on my UEFI machine.
I think you'd find Puppy Users running a mixture of versions 1 through to 5 in equal amounts. I don't think it's 80% 5.x.x... 20% the rest.

A lot of Puppy users have there favorite series, I for one love series 2 and spend 90% of my time there.
Legacy OS 2017 has been released.

User avatar
greengeek
Posts: 5789
Joined: Tue 20 Jul 2010, 09:34
Location: Republic of Novo Zelande

#30 Post by greengeek »

john biles wrote: I for one love series 2 and spend 90% of my time there.
As a matter of interest do you have any series 2 puppies that allow you to browse modern websites and play youtube videos?

User avatar
James C
Posts: 6618
Joined: Thu 26 Mar 2009, 05:12
Location: Kentucky

#31 Post by James C »

greengeek wrote:
john biles wrote: I for one love series 2 and spend 90% of my time there.
As a matter of interest do you have any series 2 puppies that allow you to browse modern websites and play youtube videos?
I don't know about john biles but I do, Ttuuxxx's 214X w/ SeaMonkey 2.23 (auto-updates to stay current) and Flash 11.2r202.
Attachments
214X Top10.jpg
(69.83 KiB) Downloaded 719 times

gcmartin

#32 Post by gcmartin »

We must appreciate the idea that @GoingNuts offers...a guide and/or utilities to do just what he mentions when booting a Puppy, "if you are a Windows user".

To start, some documentation or media could guide on a simple approach to get any user started in PUP initial setup and use, followed by a request to allow PUPPY to acquired those items he mentions here.. If the user allows it, those items would be brought into the Puppy format/fold, while leaving all Windows current files intact.

Now, I'm the first to admit that this is NOT necessarily trivial, but, there may already be some tools in existence to do some of those things. The biggest concern from my point of view is the fact that Windows PC can have multiple IDs on a single PC; so to bring that information into the PUP would requires some drill-down interview questions OR would require a Windows program to "pack everything up" for Puppy to use on its next reboot.

But, these are just some ideas for steps to acquire that information for use in PUP(s).

Happy Holidays to all throughout the remainder of this year. Peace be with you.

User avatar
john biles
Posts: 1458
Joined: Sun 17 Sep 2006, 14:05
Location: Australia
Contact:

#33 Post by john biles »

gcmartin,
Currently running Legacy OS 2.1 Development which is nearing release. Life has slowed down development. It features Opera 12 + Flashplayer 10.3 and Youtube video's play fine.

Legacy OS 2.1 Gamer also includes Opera 12 + Flashplayer 10.3 and can be downloaded from here http://sourceforge.net/projects/legacyoslinux/files/ While it's focus is games there's still enough extras to make it a usable for general tasks.
Legacy OS 2017 has been released.

User avatar
ThoriumBlvd
Posts: 159
Joined: Fri 04 Oct 2013, 09:04
Location: N.E. USA

#34 Post by ThoriumBlvd »

My history sine 1997... W95.2 ---> W98.2 ---> Asus Xandros (702 and 900A) ---> Puppy Slacko 5.5XL. Going from Asus Xandros to Puppy did require the purchase of a "Full Size" "Portable" CD/DVD drive $50. But I have been a very happy camper with the new Kernal and options. Right now I'm using the 900A model with USB. My important stuff in mnt/home, save on shutdown, and reduced the Browser Cache to 8Mb. The browser add-ons make the internet a better experience, and I have also added "Redirect Cleaner", and FireFTP. The FireFOX is 23.0. I have recently discovered a 407 point score on html5 test. I like that this OS fits on a CD even with Java and OO4.

It feels functional and useful enough.
[img]http://www.am3radio.us/image3.jpg[/img] . [img]http://www.am3radio.us/image4.jpg[/img]

nooby
Posts: 10369
Joined: Sun 29 Jun 2008, 19:05
Location: SwedenEurope

#35 Post by nooby »

I am a bit or too much "anal retarded" om this topic/issue.

Ithink it would kill Puppy and create a lot of strife.

As it is dome now it works as is possible.

To try to bring Puppy to the masses would stop that
creative flow and make it a job without paying for it.

You have to read up on inner motivation how difficult
it is to uphold such. The demands of the crowd is
something else than free flowing exchanges of ideas.

So please give up or you will be the one that killed a very good thing.

Trust me on this :)
I use Google Search on Puppy Forum
not an ideal solution though

nooby
Posts: 10369
Joined: Sun 29 Jun 2008, 19:05
Location: SwedenEurope

#36 Post by nooby »

the title is slighly misleading.

It can be a replacement for many things
but a few examples show it can to replace Win whatever.

Take Sony Android phone and maybe other brands as well.

They can upgrade using special made programs that only work
in Win. Not on Linux unless your a good prgrammer and can tweak

Wine to have enough tailor made modifications.

Another example. Genealogy some a bit older but still loved
progranms did only work on win xp. nothing else could
unless you could change the wine part your self

There should be other examples but my my brain turned itself off.

I get back if I find it again :)
I use Google Search on Puppy Forum
not an ideal solution though

zaivala
Posts: 125
Joined: Mon 21 Mar 2011, 07:14

#37 Post by zaivala »

nooby wrote:I am a bit or too much "anal retarded" om this topic/issue.
Trust me on this, you mean "anal retentive". You may be feeling retarded but that ain't the same thing.

Moss
Grammar Nazi

User avatar
NickAu
Posts: 183
Joined: Mon 30 Dec 2013, 04:32
Location: Far North Coast NSW ɹÇ￾punuÊ￾op

#38 Post by NickAu »

/ SeaMonkey 2.23 (auto-updates to stay current) and Flash 11.2r202
As a Ex Windows user I think this is great, All puppies should be able to auto update browser and flash. I do not know how easy that would be but hey you guys are smart. I want to be able to go to help/about( in firefox ) and just update from there no other messing around, Same with flash player...Pease.
Flashplayer 10.3
May I ask why not the latest? eg just before realease install the latest ? And or Fix the get latest flash thing .
As a former Windows user I had it drummed into me Update Update Update to stay secure. And in Windows World flash 10 is anything but, If your read the security warnings that is.

After reading some of the posts about pc specs and browser/flash versions on this forum I have 1 thing to say to some guys.

Guys Noah wants his pc and browser back. Sorry but thats funny LOL.


EDIT
When I first installed puppy 5.7.1 it had an older version of Firefox. No problem to update you say go to PPM. But it wasn't there, I had no idea at first that I had to do a update of ppm first to get access to the new browser. And couldnt just update thru the browser.
[b]Precise Puppy 5.7.1 Retro Fatty Edition. Hp Compaq 2510p 2x Intel(R) Core(TM) 2 Duo Cpu U7700@ 1.33 ghz,2 gig ram Booting from 8 gig micro USB + 32 gig SD card instead of HDD[/b]

User avatar
James C
Posts: 6618
Joined: Thu 26 Mar 2009, 05:12
Location: Kentucky

#39 Post by James C »

NickAu wrote:
Flashplayer 10.3
May I ask why not the latest? eg just before realease install the latest ? And or Fix the get latest flash thing .
As a former Windows user I had it drummed into me Update Update Update to stay secure. And in Windows World flash 10 is anything but, If your read the security warnings that is.
Some, I hesitate to say "all", Intel P3 and older cpu's as well as AMD Athlon XP and older cpu's will not operate with anything newer than Flash 10.3

The later versions of Flash requires a CPU instruction set extension called SSE2, which the Athlon XP, etc. does not support.

User avatar
NickAu
Posts: 183
Joined: Mon 30 Dec 2013, 04:32
Location: Far North Coast NSW ɹÇ￾punuÊ￾op

#40 Post by NickAu »

Some, I hesitate to say "all", Intel P3 and older cpu's as well as AMD Athlon XP and older cpu's will not operate with anything newer than Flash 10.3
I do understand that but It could still be an option for us who did not steal our pc from noah's ark.

My processor on 1 pc is a Pentuin 3 xeon celaron and it runs Xp with the latest FF browsre and Flash no probs and 1 gig ram.
[b]Precise Puppy 5.7.1 Retro Fatty Edition. Hp Compaq 2510p 2x Intel(R) Core(TM) 2 Duo Cpu U7700@ 1.33 ghz,2 gig ram Booting from 8 gig micro USB + 32 gig SD card instead of HDD[/b]

Post Reply