Fatdog64-630 & 631 Final (May 12 2014)

A home for all kinds of Puppy related projects
Message
Author
jamesbond
Posts: 3433
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007, 05:02
Location: The Blue Marble

Re: Question on fd64-devx_630.sfs

#201 Post by jamesbond »

Sunny wrote:Thanks for that reply jamesbond, but I understood that part of it. What seems to be the problem is that the subdirectories gdk-pixbuf and gdk-pixbuf-xlib are included in /usr/include/gtk-2.0 ... but they are also in /usr/include/gdk-pixbuf-2.0
Thank you for the clarification. Of course I had to miss the original question - doh! :(
For example, the individual files in /usr/include/gtk-2.0/gdk-pixbuf have the same names as the files in /usr/include/gdk-pixbuf-2.0/gdk-pixbuf ... but the files are different.

If I had to hazard a guess, it seems to me like the subdirectories (gdk-pixbuf & gdk-pixbuf-xlib) should not be in the directory /usr/include/gtk-2.0 (I believe this is where the old versions of gdk-pixbuf put them, but the newer versions are putting them in /usr/include/gdk-pixbuf-2.0)
You're right. The ones in gtk-2.0 are the old ones and can safely be ignored (or deleted). I checked against devx for 521. Thanks for pointing this out; did you ever have problems because of them?
Fatdog64 forum links: [url=http://murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?t=117546]Latest version[/url] | [url=https://cutt.ly/ke8sn5H]Contributed packages[/url] | [url=https://cutt.ly/se8scrb]ISO builder[/url]

Sunny
Posts: 35
Joined: Tue 20 Oct 2009, 23:11

Question on fd64-devx_630.sfs

#202 Post by Sunny »

I did run into a problem when compiling one of the dependencies for osmgpsmap. The way the library path was set up in FatDog (I did not change any paths when I configured it), the compiler decided to use the old gdk-pixbuf files. All I had to do was delete the gdk-pixbuf and gdk-pixbuf-xlib subdirectories in /usr/include/gtk-2.0 ... the compiler then used the correct versions in /usr/include/gdk-pixbuf-2.0

DrDeaf
Posts: 69
Joined: Sat 30 Dec 2006, 14:10

#203 Post by DrDeaf »

neerajkolte wrote: After reading your comment I downloaded easy2boot and installed it on my usb.
I have successfully booted both Fatdog64-630 and precise puppy from it.
Also I have made e2b usb from both windows7 and my fatdog64. Both times it worked and boots fine. Are you using latest version of e2b. Because I even didn't have to worry about .mnu file I just placed my ISOs in mainmenu folder. I have also tested them by placing in Linux folder.
I didn't encounter any prob.
Yes, the mainmenu method is the only one for me! The mnu examples varied widely from OS to OS (linux) and with no example for FD, I decided to pass. I discarded that option when I first began to figure out how I wanted to handle my boot.media.
However, congratulations on your successes! Although I keep my USB locked "RO" and a corruption is unlikely I am trying to get a fresh download. It keeps stalling out after a few hundred KB however and I may not be able to get it until I return to "First World" internet quality. in April
One item of interest: While repeating the download efforts I was looking around the site and I saw a notice posted yesterday of a forthcoming ISOPUP extension for us! Perhaps there have been others with problems.

nooby
Posts: 10369
Joined: Sun 29 Jun 2008, 19:05
Location: SwedenEurope

#204 Post by nooby »

Not to derail this fine thread could you give a link to isopup?
I failed to find it. Send me PM if that suites you.
I use Google Search on Puppy Forum
not an ideal solution though

DrDeaf
Posts: 69
Joined: Sat 30 Dec 2006, 14:10

#205 Post by DrDeaf »

nooby wrote:Not to derail this fine thread could you give a link to isopup?
I failed to find it. Send me PM if that suites you.
Hello there, nooby! You are always a fun read.... Well, if you hit the word "notice" in my post above you should reach the URL for the "isopup" news. I just tested it and it worked for me :) However, YMMV (never know what will happen). So, here is the link:

http://www.easy2boot.com/news/e2b-v-130-coming-soon-/

Cheers!

nooby
Posts: 10369
Joined: Sun 29 Jun 2008, 19:05
Location: SwedenEurope

#206 Post by nooby »

Thanks my imagination failed me. You talk about
E2B v.1.30 coming soon!

I had better luck with rcrsn51 and his isobooter.

I guess E2B is a good program too butmy poor brain
did know what to do reading the instructions for isobooter
and failed to remember all the details of how to set up
E2B versions.

So I derailed and will step back.

I only use frugal install of FatDog
and will try to use it on the UEFI machine within some months :)
I use Google Search on Puppy Forum
not an ideal solution though

User avatar
Ted Dog
Posts: 3965
Joined: Wed 14 Sep 2005, 02:35
Location: Heart of Texas

Fatdog64 630 fixed 8G boundaries issues

#207 Post by Ted Dog »

Unexpected surprise multisession now works past 8G which it did not before on last versions of Fatdog64. I am really sure it was not my retooling of remaster and fast methods on my box for the fastdog project that could have accounted for the improvements.. Just did not test it since last version looked as if the 8G was a legacy style bug to growisofs ie unfixed due to age.

So the sky is the limit.. or at least to end of logical size of normal el cheapo 25G BD media which is 23.54G in real world terms.

jamesbond
Posts: 3433
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007, 05:02
Location: The Blue Marble

Re: Fatdog64 630 fixed 8G boundaries issues

#208 Post by jamesbond »

Ted Dog wrote:Unexpected surprise multisession now works past 8G which it did not before on last versions of Fatdog64. I am really sure it was not my retooling of remaster and fast methods on my box for the fastdog project that could have accounted for the improvements.. Just did not test it since last version looked as if the 8G was a legacy style bug to growisofs ie unfixed due to age.

So the sky is the limit.. or at least to end of logical size of normal el cheapo 25G BD media which is 23.54G in real world terms.
It was fixed thanks to rcrsn51. He got a bluray drive just for this purpose and tested all combinations of burns and fixes; and he finally found the fix, which is incorporated in 630.

Speaking of which, I haven't seen him around, I hope he's okay.

cheers!
Fatdog64 forum links: [url=http://murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?t=117546]Latest version[/url] | [url=https://cutt.ly/ke8sn5H]Contributed packages[/url] | [url=https://cutt.ly/se8scrb]ISO builder[/url]

gcmartin

#209 Post by gcmartin »

Speaking of missing; We haven't seen much of @Pemasu, or @TaZoC this year either. Hope they, along with @Rcrsn51, are still around. They have contributed so much to this community.

Peace be with you

User avatar
neerajkolte
Posts: 516
Joined: Mon 10 Feb 2014, 07:05
Location: Pune, India.

Running Windows in Virtualbox 4.2.4

#210 Post by neerajkolte »

Hello everyone,
I have downloaded virtualbox4.2.4 sfs from sfs manager in control panel and loaded it.
But I could not start virtualbox from it's menu entry under system section.
So I ran it from urvxt and got

Code: Select all

#virtualbox
WARNING: The vboxdrv kernel module is not loaded. Either there is no module
         available for the current kernel (3.12.9) or it failed to
         load. Please recompile the kernel module and install it by

           sudo /etc/init.d/vboxdrv setup

         You will not be able to start VMs until this problem is fixed.
The program started but showed this error. I could create virtual machine but could't start it.
So I ran

Code: Select all

# /etc/init.d/vboxdrv setup
Stopping VirtualBox kernel modules ...done.
Recompiling VirtualBox kernel modules ...failed!
  (Look at /var/log/vbox-install.log to find out what went wrong)
Looking at log I got
/opt/VirtualBox/src/vboxhost/build_in_tmp: line 62: make: command not found
So I downloaded fd64-devx_630.sfs and loaded it.
But again "vboxdrv setup" failed and log reads
Makefile:181: *** Error: unable to find the sources of your current Linux kernel. Specify KERN_DIR=<directory> and run Make again. Stop.
I got from system info that my kernel is 3.12.9.
But in sfs manager I couldn't find its kernel source sfs.
There are sfs for 3.11.4 and 3.8.7.
Could anyone tell me where to find it.
Thanks in advance...
"One of my most productive days was throwing away 1000 lines of code."
- Ken Thompson

“We tend to overestimate the effect of a technology in the short run and underestimate the effect in the long run.â€￾
- Amara’s Law.

User avatar
smokey01
Posts: 2813
Joined: Sat 30 Dec 2006, 23:15
Location: South Australia :-(
Contact:

#211 Post by smokey01 »

I got from system info that my kernel is 3.12.9.
But in sfs manager I couldn't find its kernel source sfs.
There are sfs for 3.11.4 and 3.8.7.
Could anyone tell me where to find it.
Thanks in advance...
http://ftp.nluug.nl/ftp/pub/os/Linux/di ... 3.12.9.sfs

User avatar
neerajkolte
Posts: 516
Joined: Mon 10 Feb 2014, 07:05
Location: Pune, India.

#212 Post by neerajkolte »

Thanks Smokey,
I will download it n report back.

Hmm.. 99mb this will take almost 2hrs on my android's slow 2G net connection
"One of my most productive days was throwing away 1000 lines of code."
- Ken Thompson

“We tend to overestimate the effect of a technology in the short run and underestimate the effect in the long run.â€￾
- Amara’s Law.

sys64738
Posts: 1
Joined: Sat 15 Mar 2014, 10:46
Location: Hanau Germany

Clonezilla in FD64?

#213 Post by sys64738 »

Hi all,
I like FD64_630 and this forum !

In FD64 i've found some clone/partition tools (gparted, ntfsclone ...)
My favorite tool "clonezilla" is missing, but perhaps i can load/install a working PET/SFS.
Is there a ready package out, i can't find it anywhere.

THX in advance.

User avatar
neerajkolte
Posts: 516
Joined: Mon 10 Feb 2014, 07:05
Location: Pune, India.

Running Windows in Virtualbox 4.2.4

#214 Post by neerajkolte »

Thanks Snokey.
I downloaded kernel-source-3.12.9.sfs and loaded it.
now when I run "/etc/init.d/vboxdrv" setup it again say failed. And log file reads as....
make KBUILD_VERBOSE=1 SUBDIRS=/tmp/vbox.0 SRCROOT=/tmp/vbox.0 CONFIG_MODULE_SIG= -C /lib/modules/3.12.9/build modules
test -e include/generated/autoconf.h -a -e include/config/auto.conf || ( \
echo >&2; \
echo >&2 " ERROR: Kernel configuration is invalid."; \
echo >&2 " include/generated/autoconf.h or include/config/auto.conf are missing.";\
echo >&2 " Run 'make oldconfig && make prepare' on kernel src to fix it."; \
echo >&2 ; \
/bin/false)
mkdir -p /tmp/vbox.0/.tmp_versions ; rm -f /tmp/vbox.0/.tmp_versions/*
make -f scripts/Makefile.build obj=/tmp/vbox.0
gcc -Wp,-MD,/tmp/vbox.0/linux/.SUPDrv-linux.o.d -nostdinc -isystem /usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-t2-linux-gnu/4.6.2/include -I/usr/src/linux-3.12.9/arch/x86/include -Iarch/x86/include/generated -Iinclude -I/usr/src/linux-3.12.9/arch/x86/include/uapi -Iarch/x86/include/generated/uapi -I/usr/src/linux-3.12.9/include/uapi -Iinclude/generated/uapi -include /usr/src/linux-3.12.9/include/linux/kconfig.h -D__KERNEL__ -Wall -Wundef -Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-trigraphs -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common -Werror-implicit-function-declaration -Wno-format-security -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks -O2 -m64 -mno-mmx -mno-sse -mtune=generic -mno-red-zone -mcmodel=kernel -funit-at-a-time -maccumulate-outgoing-args -DCONFIG_AS_CFI=1 -DCONFIG_AS_CFI_SIGNAL_FRAME=1 -DCONFIG_AS_CFI_SECTIONS=1 -DCONFIG_AS_FXSAVEQ=1 -DCONFIG_AS_AVX=1 -pipe -Wno-sign-compare -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables -mno-sse -mno-mmx -mno-sse2 -mno-3dnow -mno-avx -Wframe-larger-than=1024 -fno-stack-protector -Wno-unused-but-set-variable -fomit-frame-pointer -Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wno-pointer-sign -fno-strict-overflow -fconserve-stack -DCC_HAVE_ASM_GOTO -include /tmp/vbox.0/include/VBox/SUPDrvMangling.h -I/lib/modules/3.12.9/build/include -I/tmp/vbox.0/ -I/tmp/vbox.0/include -I/tmp/vbox.0/r0drv/linux -I/tmp/vbox.0/vboxdrv/ -I/tmp/vbox.0/vboxdrv/include -I/tmp/vbox.0/vboxdrv/r0drv/linux -D__KERNEL__ -DMODULE -DRT_OS_LINUX -DIN_RING0 -DIN_RT_R0 -DIN_SUP_R0 -DVBOX -DRT_WITH_VBOX -DVBOX_WITH_HARDENING -DCONFIG_VBOXDRV_AS_MISC -DRT_ARCH_AMD64 -DVBOX_WITH_64_BITS_GUESTS -DMODULE -D"KBUILD_STR(s)=#s" -D"KBUILD_BASENAME=KBUILD_STR(SUPDrv_linux)" -D"KBUILD_MODNAME=KBUILD_STR(vboxdrv)" -c -o /tmp/vbox.0/linux/.tmp_SUPDrv-linux.o /tmp/vbox.0/linux/SUPDrv-linux.c
/tmp/vbox.0/linux/SUPDrv-linux.c: In function 'vboxdrvLinuxUid':
/tmp/vbox.0/linux/SUPDrv-linux.c:226:5: error: incompatible types when returning type 'kuid_t' but 'RTUID' was expected
/tmp/vbox.0/linux/SUPDrv-linux.c: In function 'vboxdrvLinuxGid':
/tmp/vbox.0/linux/SUPDrv-linux.c:235:5: error: incompatible types when returning type 'kgid_t' but 'RTGID' was expected
/tmp/vbox.0/linux/SUPDrv-linux.c: In function 'vboxdrvLinuxEuid':
/tmp/vbox.0/linux/SUPDrv-linux.c:244:5: error: incompatible types when returning type 'kuid_t' but 'RTUID' was expected
/tmp/vbox.0/linux/SUPDrv-linux.c:248:1: warning: control reaches end of non-void function [-Wreturn-type]
/tmp/vbox.0/linux/SUPDrv-linux.c: In function 'vboxdrvLinuxUid':
/tmp/vbox.0/linux/SUPDrv-linux.c:230:1: warning: control reaches end of non-void function [-Wreturn-type]
/tmp/vbox.0/linux/SUPDrv-linux.c: In function 'vboxdrvLinuxGid':
/tmp/vbox.0/linux/SUPDrv-linux.c:239:1: warning: control reaches end of non-void function [-Wreturn-type]
make[2]: *** [/tmp/vbox.0/linux/SUPDrv-linux.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** [_module_/tmp/vbox.0] Error 2
make: *** [vboxdrv] Error 2
I don't have expertise to interpret that. (In plain text "It all went over my head") :wink: :D

Any idea what should I do next....
"One of my most productive days was throwing away 1000 lines of code."
- Ken Thompson

“We tend to overestimate the effect of a technology in the short run and underestimate the effect in the long run.â€￾
- Amara’s Law.

User avatar
smokey01
Posts: 2813
Joined: Sat 30 Dec 2006, 23:15
Location: South Australia :-(
Contact:

#215 Post by smokey01 »

You should be able to start vbox from the menu under system.

There should also be a script in /usr/local/bin/vbox:

!/bin/sh
depmod
/etc/init.d/vboxdrv start
VirtualBox &

Try this script. It also might be worth a reboot if it doesn't run.

Good luck.

Gobbi
Posts: 255
Joined: Fri 09 Mar 2012, 14:01

Re: Running Windows in Virtualbox 4.2.4

#216 Post by Gobbi »

neerajkolte wrote: I downloaded kernel-source-3.12.9.sfs and loaded it.
This is how I did install Virtual Box . Loaded the 32-bit sfs , devx sfs and kernel source sfs then used the script from the attachment ( thank's to Jamesbond) while beeing connected to internet . In the end I unloaded the devx and kernel source sfs .
Attachments
install_virtualbox.sh.gz
Install VirtualBox
(402 Bytes) Downloaded 277 times

nooby
Posts: 10369
Joined: Sun 29 Jun 2008, 19:05
Location: SwedenEurope

#217 Post by nooby »

I really want this to work on my latest Laptop.
But I am too afraid to fail because if I fail it takes
many days or weeks to recover due to my too
overly sensitive.psychologic body system.
I use Google Search on Puppy Forum
not an ideal solution though

User avatar
neerajkolte
Posts: 516
Joined: Mon 10 Feb 2014, 07:05
Location: Pune, India.

Running Windows in Virtualbox 4.2.4

#218 Post by neerajkolte »

smokey01 wrote:You should be able to start vbox from the menu under system.

There should also be a script in /usr/local/bin/vbox:

!/bin/sh
depmod
/etc/init.d/vboxdrv start
VirtualBox &

Try this script. It also might be worth a reboot if it doesn't run.

Good luck.
No luck... There is nothing named vbox in /usr/local/bin

Gonna try Gobbi's suggestion.
I have downloaded the script (Thanks Jamesbond).
I have a question though...
I have opened the script as text what I think it does is...
Use wget to find out what is the latest version of virtualbox and downloads its 64bit version(it looks for V.*_amd64.run).
So why should I need 32bit sfs???

I have started 32 bit sfs download anyway, should be ready in 20min.
"One of my most productive days was throwing away 1000 lines of code."
- Ken Thompson

“We tend to overestimate the effect of a technology in the short run and underestimate the effect in the long run.â€￾
- Amara’s Law.

User avatar
neerajkolte
Posts: 516
Joined: Mon 10 Feb 2014, 07:05
Location: Pune, India.

Offtopic

#219 Post by neerajkolte »

This is really off topic but tomorrow is Holi (festival of colours) in India.

I am gonna be drenched in many colours from head to toe.

I just wanna wish you all my friends Happy Holi,
May your life be filled with colours. :D :D
"One of my most productive days was throwing away 1000 lines of code."
- Ken Thompson

“We tend to overestimate the effect of a technology in the short run and underestimate the effect in the long run.â€￾
- Amara’s Law.

beau_tox
Posts: 39
Joined: Wed 01 Aug 2012, 08:59
Location: Sacramento CA

ATI Catalyst pet not working

#220 Post by beau_tox »

Frugal install Fatdog64-630 on usb flash drive.

Base install seems to work fine.

Installed ati-catalyst-14.1b-FD630-HD5000-and-up.pet


The ATI Catalyst Control Center that tells me I am using a Radeon HD 6310.

glxinfo and glxgears gives error messages.

xorg.conf is as follows:


Section "ServerLayout"
Identifier "aticonfig Layout"
Screen 0 "aticonfig-Screen[0]-0" 0 0
EndSection

Section "Module"
EndSection

Section "Monitor"
Identifier "aticonfig-Monitor[0]-0"
Option "VendorName" "ATI Proprietary Driver"
Option "ModelName" "Generic Autodetecting Monitor"
Option "DPMS" "true"
EndSection

Section "Device"
Identifier "aticonfig-Device[0]-0"
Driver "fglrx"
BusID "PCI:0:1:0"
EndSection

Section "Screen"
Identifier "aticonfig-Screen[0]-0"
Device "aticonfig-Device[0]-0"
Monitor "aticonfig-Monitor[0]-0"
DefaultDepth 24
SubSection "Display"
Viewport 0 0
Depth 24
EndSubSection
EndSection
Fatdog64 802
Frugal install to 8 Gbyte SDHC with savefile
Zotac AD03 BlueRay AMD E350 (1.6 GHz Dual Core) ATI Radeon HD 6310 GPU
8 GB RAM, Diskless

Post Reply