Woof-based Puppy builders wanted

News, happenings
Message
Author
User avatar
mavrothal
Posts: 3096
Joined: Mon 24 Aug 2009, 18:23

#101 Post by mavrothal »

slavvo67 wrote: and then I noticed that Woof requires 1/2 TB? Is that right?
1/2 TB? :shock:
How/where did you noticed?
Usually 10GB is more than enough even to build your kernel
== [url=http://www.catb.org/esr/faqs/smart-questions.html]Here is how to solve your[/url] [url=https://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/bugs.html]Linux problems fast[/url] ==

User avatar
mavrothal
Posts: 3096
Joined: Mon 24 Aug 2009, 18:23

#102 Post by mavrothal »

battleshooter wrote:if was a dev, I'd be one of those stubborn cats that wouldn't move in the right direction.
All directions are good!
Saluki/Carolina share code with "main stream" puppies (bidirectionally). Someone just needs to do the sharing... :wink:
== [url=http://www.catb.org/esr/faqs/smart-questions.html]Here is how to solve your[/url] [url=https://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/bugs.html]Linux problems fast[/url] ==

User avatar
Ted Dog
Posts: 3965
Joined: Wed 14 Sep 2005, 02:35
Location: Heart of Texas

#103 Post by Ted Dog »

I do not like cats, yet they always try to warm up to me. How upto date is T2 I tried years back to roll my own pre MacTel mac PowerPC spin but bogged down on Xwindows not finishing.

User avatar
CatDude
Posts: 1563
Joined: Wed 03 Jan 2007, 17:49
Location: UK

#104 Post by CatDude »

Hi
Ted Dog wrote:I do not like cats......
:shock: :shock:
[img]http://www.smokey01.com/CatDude/.temp/sigs/acer-futile.gif[/img]

User avatar
peebee
Posts: 4370
Joined: Sun 21 Sep 2008, 12:31
Location: Worcestershire, UK
Contact:

OB Precise 14.07, Woof-CE build

#105 Post by peebee »

vicmz has joined the club.....

OB Precise 14.07, Woof-CE build

Great to see another Woof-based Puppy builder......
ImageLxPup = Puppy + LXDE
Main version used daily: LxPupSc; Assembler of UPups, ScPup & ScPup64, LxPup, LxPupSc & LxPupSc64

User avatar
mavrothal
Posts: 3096
Joined: Mon 24 Aug 2009, 18:23

#106 Post by mavrothal »

:D
Now it time for some code contribution in woof-CE :wink:
== [url=http://www.catb.org/esr/faqs/smart-questions.html]Here is how to solve your[/url] [url=https://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/bugs.html]Linux problems fast[/url] ==

User avatar
ASRI éducation
Posts: 3197
Joined: Sat 09 May 2009, 12:10
Location: France
Contact:

#107 Post by ASRI éducation »

mavrothal wrote:Now it time for some code contribution in woof-CE :wink:
I will try soon to make my contribution to woof-CE (before that, I must better understand the functioning of Git).
Cordialement,
Projet ASRI éducation => [url=http://asri-education.org/]Association[/url] | [url=http://forum.asri-education.org/]Forum[/url] | [url=http://dl01.asri-education.org/]Dépôt[/url] | [url=http://kids.asri-education.org/]Espace kids[/url]

wanderer
Posts: 1098
Joined: Sat 20 Oct 2007, 23:17

#108 Post by wanderer »

I would like to use woof-ce to try to build an absolutely minimal debian based iso

That is an iso that will only boot to busybox ash shell

any advice would be appreciated

thanks

wanderer

User avatar
mavrothal
Posts: 3096
Joined: Mon 24 Aug 2009, 18:23

#109 Post by mavrothal »

wanderer wrote: That is an iso that will only boot to busybox ash shell
That's what inird usually is. Puppies/FatDog etc have code to stay with initrd and not switch to the layered file system.
But you can do this almost with any distro that used initrd.
== [url=http://www.catb.org/esr/faqs/smart-questions.html]Here is how to solve your[/url] [url=https://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/bugs.html]Linux problems fast[/url] ==

jamesbond
Posts: 3433
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007, 05:02
Location: The Blue Marble

#110 Post by jamesbond »

wanderer wrote:I would like to use woof-ce to try to build an absolutely minimal debian based iso

That is an iso that will only boot to busybox ash shell

any advice would be appreciated

thanks

wanderer
Try woof-ce "next" branch. Then look at the package list, which you can cutdown to minimal (shell-only).

cheers!
Fatdog64 forum links: [url=http://murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?t=117546]Latest version[/url] | [url=https://cutt.ly/ke8sn5H]Contributed packages[/url] | [url=https://cutt.ly/se8scrb]ISO builder[/url]

wanderer
Posts: 1098
Joined: Sat 20 Oct 2007, 23:17

#111 Post by wanderer »

thanks for the info
much appreciated

wanderer

User avatar
mysticmarks
Posts: 159
Joined: Tue 27 Feb 2007, 01:56
Location: California
Contact:

woof development and elsewhere

#112 Post by mysticmarks »

I've been away for some time and will be back working on a project started a few years back ago. I have been through a few moves, and have to do some hunting to find where I left off. I hit alpha but could not get savebacks to commit. The project is essentially a new distro containing the best aspects of them all. I had started with Barrys woof work, and found that the T2 environment had been updated right at that time. I went back to the core of it all and used T2 from their newest 8 series. It took me a few days to fulyl understand the tool, but was able to get a firm grasp and created a build using t2 that would run cross architecture on many platforms.(let me tell you, getting t2 to to reach repo was crazy. what did i do?.. booted puppy and installed t2 on a new small linux partition. worked great) After success with that tool system, i started to go through the woof scripts and a few others that have been central to puppy to examine them finer. I was able to modify scripts to pull from large distro repos as well. I was pleased with the effort and got deeper yet. I decided to try to do something unconventional in development. I went into the base boot and changed the basic boot info to show very user friendly explainations with standard boot info from a narration viewpoint. There are a few more changes and a huge addition that changes a lot if i get the configurations correct. Everything went great on alpha compilation and ran from cd fine, but i could not get the saveback to occur. This was the final major fix needed befor beta release.
What did my work amount to?
It amounted to:

a single distro that used slack/deb/ubuntu/puppy/t2 repos (modifed ppm for the task)

a distro that used the core boot scripting and functions puppy is known for.
fully expandable into, well.. anything.( it's a little bigger than puppy, but not much, i think my alpha was 160mb or so.)

COMPLETELY new kernel and cross arch compile(i covered more than needed by far, this will be useable on almost any kind of device;scales to hardware)

(a few secrets that are new to computing in general, I'll cover that when it's time)

_________

SO, with that all out there. My current goal is to locate my alpha and see if it survived. If I find it, I'll be back on where I left off. If not, i'll be rebuilding again from the freshest of the fresh once again(which may not be an entirely bad idea, though it will take far more time again). Anyone else that's taken things this far and is interested please feel free to message me and I will see what kind of help I could use to get to beta release and kick this thing off again. I'll be checking forums more regularly and post when i'm hitting another milestone if i do rebuild from the beginning.

User avatar
mavrothal
Posts: 3096
Joined: Mon 24 Aug 2009, 18:23

Re: woof development and elsewhere

#113 Post by mavrothal »

mysticmarks wrote:Anyone else that's taken things this far and is interested please feel free to message me and I will see what kind of help I could use to get to beta release and kick this thing off again. I'll be checking forums more regularly and post when i'm hitting another milestone if i do rebuild from the beginning.
scsijon is currently working on a T2 build.
== [url=http://www.catb.org/esr/faqs/smart-questions.html]Here is how to solve your[/url] [url=https://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/bugs.html]Linux problems fast[/url] ==

wiak
Posts: 2040
Joined: Tue 11 Dec 2007, 05:12
Location: not Bulgaria

#114 Post by wiak »

wrong thread

Post Reply