I compiled a new version of icecat and sailed in to
https://panopticlick.eff.org to check fingerprint.
I got
"one in 1,550,338 browsers have the same fingerprint as yours."
The value was about the same with
window maximized or the size it started with.
Then I thought to try tor-browser for comparison and got
"one in 4,930 browsers have the same fingerprint as yours."
That is realy good. This was with the size of window as it was started with.
way better than icecat.
Then I tried with tor-browser maximized and got.
"one in 2,067,119 browsers have the same fingerprint as yours."
that's worse than icecat!
The browser is much more trackable maximized.
Panopticlick says Icecat better than Tor-browser?
Yeah I thought so to at first but if you read carefully
"one in 4,930 browsers have the same fingerprint as yours."
happens more often than
"one in 2,067,119 browsers have the same fingerprint as yours."
You want as many as possible with the same fingerprint
If the whole selection is like 9G (9 billion)???
then one in 4K is
9B/4K = 2250000 with the same fingerprint as you
and one in 2M is
9B/2M = 4500 with the same fingerprint as you
right?
"one in 4,930 browsers have the same fingerprint as yours."
happens more often than
"one in 2,067,119 browsers have the same fingerprint as yours."
You want as many as possible with the same fingerprint
If the whole selection is like 9G (9 billion)???
then one in 4K is
9B/4K = 2250000 with the same fingerprint as you
and one in 2M is
9B/2M = 4500 with the same fingerprint as you
right?