Run Firefox, PaleMoon or Seamonkey? Then this is for YOU!
Simply install the Greasemonkey extension (Scriptish on Seamonkey) and the phpBB Image Resizer script.
Open Prefs >> User Settings >> clk "Add" and paste "http://www.murga-linux.com/puppy/*"
You're set!
No more annoying, over-sized images to contend with. Here's a sample page..
How to view phpBB forums without a horizontal scroll-bar
Nice!
- Attachments
-
- icon9.gif
- Does it stop if some jerk puts in a load of file comment text though? Perhaps it may, perhaps it might not. Interesting idea though. Thanks Semme (its been quite a while since I messed around with Stylish and Greasemonkey). Testing la-de-dah de-la-de-dah
- (763 Bytes) Downloaded 367 times
Last edited by rufwoof on Thu 21 Jan 2016, 00:22, edited 1 time in total.
[size=75]( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) :wq[/size]
[url=http://murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?p=1028256#1028256][size=75]Fatdog multi-session usb[/url][/size]
[size=75][url=https://hashbang.sh]echo url|sed -e 's/^/(c/' -e 's/$/ hashbang.sh)/'|sh[/url][/size]
[url=http://murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?p=1028256#1028256][size=75]Fatdog multi-session usb[/url][/size]
[size=75][url=https://hashbang.sh]echo url|sed -e 's/^/(c/' -e 's/$/ hashbang.sh)/'|sh[/url][/size]
Not so sure http://www.inmotionhosting.com/support/ ... t-settings Image size can be limited before being transposed to just a link, but attachment description doesn't seem to have a limit option, and instead seems to just be set to 255 max chars - a limit presumably hard coded in code.Can the admin panel in phpBB address this kind of nonsense? I am sooooo schure...
Should I edit my previous post to reduce the length of the image description? Or leave it for effect/highlight?
[size=75]( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) :wq[/size]
[url=http://murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?p=1028256#1028256][size=75]Fatdog multi-session usb[/url][/size]
[size=75][url=https://hashbang.sh]echo url|sed -e 's/^/(c/' -e 's/$/ hashbang.sh)/'|sh[/url][/size]
[url=http://murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?p=1028256#1028256][size=75]Fatdog multi-session usb[/url][/size]
[size=75][url=https://hashbang.sh]echo url|sed -e 's/^/(c/' -e 's/$/ hashbang.sh)/'|sh[/url][/size]
This one's easy...
Could John "Sh!tcan" [url=http://www.180162-wsf_third-party-hosted-image-linking-disabled_figure-it-out-folks]outside image linking[/url] altogether if he chose to do so? Sure.
Would this alone eliminate the problem?.. Most certainly.
Should you leave your post to show that loopholes currently exist? Absolutely!
Do I know enough about phpBB software to address these issues?
Nope.. Not yet.
Have I been a part of a forum where a competent administrator serves?
You better believe it!
==
The best of Rulers rule by serving!
==
Oh, I'll be back alright..
==
For my reference:
Could John "Sh!tcan" [url=http://www.180162-wsf_third-party-hosted-image-linking-disabled_figure-it-out-folks]outside image linking[/url] altogether if he chose to do so? Sure.
Would this alone eliminate the problem?.. Most certainly.
Should you leave your post to show that loopholes currently exist? Absolutely!
Do I know enough about phpBB software to address these issues?
Nope.. Not yet.
Have I been a part of a forum where a competent administrator serves?
You better believe it!
==
The best of Rulers rule by serving!
==
Oh, I'll be back alright..
==
For my reference:
Code: Select all
<table width="100%" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0">
<tr><td height="15"><img src="./templates/subSilver/images/spacer.gif" alt="" height="15" border="0" /></td></tr>
</table>
<table class="attachtable" width="95%" align="center" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="0" border="1">
<colgroup>
<col width="15%">
<col width="85%">
</colgroup>
<tr>
<td class="attachheader" align="center" colspan="2">icon9.gif</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="attachrow" nowrap="nowrap"><span class="genmed"> Description </span></td>
<td class="attachrow" nowrap="nowrap"><span class="genmed"> Does it stop if some jerk puts in a load of file comment text though? Perhaps it may, perhaps it might not. Interesting idea though. Thanks Semme (its been quite a while since I messed around with Stylish and Greasemonkey). Testing la-de-dah de-la-de-dah </span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="attachrow" nowrap="nowrap"><span class="genmed"> Filesize </span></td>
<td class="attachrow" nowrap="nowrap"><span class="genmed"> 763 Bytes</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="attachrow" nowrap="nowrap"><span class="genmed"> Viewed </span></td>
<td class="attachrow" nowrap="nowrap"><span class="genmed"> 96 Time(s)</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" colspan="2"><br /><img src="viewtopic.php?mode=attach&id=94038" alt="icon9.gif" border="0" /><br /><br /></td>
</tr>
</table>
Code: Select all
<table width="*%" style="table-layout:fixed" align="*">
<tr>
<td style="word-wrap: break-word;">
</td>
</tr>
</table>
>>> Living with the immediacy of death helps you sort out your priorities. It helps you live a life less trivial <<<
- Mike Walsh
- Posts: 6351
- Joined: Sat 28 Jun 2014, 12:42
- Location: King's Lynn, UK.
From what I can tell, this "kind of" works in Firefox 28 with Scriptish on my 1024x768 screen.
On this thread:
http://www.murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?t=101174&start=300
The offending image by starhawk is resized, but the one in quotes by bark_bark_bark is not, so the horizontal line still exists.
On this thread:
http://www.murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?t=101174&start=300
The offending image by starhawk is resized, but the one in quotes by bark_bark_bark is not, so the horizontal line still exists.
That's because it's in a quote "cell" on a non-standard phpBB board.
In fact, much like Rufwoof's attachment cell above.. Like our crappy "code" cells.. Same garbage.
I've been told this forum doesn't use CSS files, that any CSS code is in the header itself.
Bad idea? That's been suggested.
Is this board nothing more than a series of non-standard hacks?
This has been suggested as well.
In fact, much like Rufwoof's attachment cell above.. Like our crappy "code" cells.. Same garbage.
I've been told this forum doesn't use CSS files, that any CSS code is in the header itself.
Bad idea? That's been suggested.
Is this board nothing more than a series of non-standard hacks?
This has been suggested as well.