Dear tirdoldog,tirdoldog wrote:@gjuhasz: I really like puli. I have used fatdog in multi-session mode and puli seems like a more advantageous implementation of multisession concept in that its more customizable and easier to move/delete session stores. Nice job!
Thank you for playing with Puli 6.0.5. See details in the first post.
The latest Google Chrome builds do not include 32-bit Linux versions. This is why Puli 6.0.5 supports Iron, Slimjet, and Firefox. Also, the newer browsers (and other software in general) need more memory. Do you have the correct size of Linux swap partition? In your case, it should be 1.5 GB.Regarding chrome, every version up to and including 34-0-1847-116_i386 works perfectly on my laptop but all newer versions won't run. Because this version is 2+ years old I have opted for FF plus noscript which is working fine for me both as spot and root. I am not sure why newer chrome does not run but it is maybe either a memory problem (only have 750MB; also getting messages about segmentation errors if I recall correctly) or perhaps the requirements for newer chip extensions (for example I know pentium III is no longer supported in the newer chrome versions).
No limitations in security profiles regarding Chrome (up to v48 although v34.0.1847.137 is the fastest one), Iron, SlimJet and Firefox. The Puli 6.0.5 install kit contains Iron and Firefox (with their flash plugins).The point being in looking at your security profile scripts, they seem to be targeted at google chrome only in that I see no other browser mentioned therein. Am I correct? What limitations/restrictions are their regarding browser/security profile combinations?
Based on the HTML5 video tests of http://peacekeeper.futuremark.com/, it seems that Iron can handle more HTML5 codecs than Firefox or Slimjet.
Have fun!
Regards,
gjuhasz