pMusic 6.0.0

Audio editors, music players, video players, burning software, etc.
Message
Author
User avatar
BarryK
Puppy Master
Posts: 9392
Joined: Mon 09 May 2005, 09:23
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Contact:

#2201 Post by BarryK »

zigbert wrote:This does not seem right. pMusic has 3 *.desktop files, so you have to link to the right one.

Your proposal is correct.
Ah, I see, in /usr/share/applications:

pmusic_CD.desktop
pmusic.desktop
pmusic_radio.desktop

The problem is in the 'pinstall.sh' script of rox-filer PET:

Code: Select all

for ONEOPEN in Abiword BaconGUI Bcrypt ePDFView FFConvert Firefox Geany gedit Ghasher Ghostview Gnumeric Gxine HomeBank InkLite Inkscape ISOMaster Leafpad LibreOffice-Calc LibreOffice-Draw LibreOffice-Impress LibreOffice-Writer mhWaveEdit Mplayer mtPaint Notecase Opera Planner Pmusic PupZip SeaMonkey-Composer SeaMonkey-web-browser Viewnior XArchive
do
 FNDOPEN="`find usr/share/applications -mindepth 1 -maxdepth 1 -type f -iname "${ONEOPEN}*.desktop" | grep -v 'mtPaint-snapshot' | head -n 1`"
 [ "$FNDOPEN" ] && ln -snf /${FNDOPEN} root/.config/rox.sourceforge.net/OpenWith/${ONEOPEN}
done
It is only grabbing one of those .desktop files.
OK, I will rethink how to do that code in pinstall.sh

EDIT: OK, fixed.
[url]https://bkhome.org/news/[/url]

User avatar
zigbert
Posts: 6621
Joined: Wed 29 Mar 2006, 18:13
Location: Valåmoen, Norway
Contact:

#2202 Post by zigbert »

Please avoid version 5.2.2
There is a bug at first run

Will update

User avatar
zigbert
Posts: 6621
Joined: Wed 29 Mar 2006, 18:13
Location: Valåmoen, Norway
Contact:

#2203 Post by zigbert »


User avatar
zigbert
Posts: 6621
Joined: Wed 29 Mar 2006, 18:13
Location: Valåmoen, Norway
Contact:

#2204 Post by zigbert »


Pelo

with the Slaxen francophone Puppy.

#2205 Post by Pelo »

PMusic 5.2.4 Medor tries it with the Slaxen francophone Puppy. Users can post questions in French there Si vous avez du mal avec l'anglais, posez vos questions à Médor, cliquez le Blue
Installed to day, new pupsave.
:D yeaah , nice
Being tested on The Vicmz OBprecise too Pmusic 4.4.6.. don't play CDs, 5.2.4 should improve that... feed-back coming

sheldonisaac
Posts: 902
Joined: Mon 22 Jun 2009, 01:36
Location: Philadelphia, PA

Re: pMusic 5.2.4

#2206 Post by sheldonisaac »

zigbert (in part) wrote:Grab music from, or just listen to thousands of radio-stations
When I try to play WQXR or WRTI, I see "connecting .."
But it doesn't play.
WFMT, as I recall, does play.

I've reinstalled repeatedly.
And done the Radio Stations complete build.

EDIT
OK, I got WQXR to play, and a few others.

Searched online for WRTI streaming, and found
http://38.100.101.74/WRTI CLASSICAL.mp3


Thank you,
Sheldon

User avatar
zigbert
Posts: 6621
Joined: Wed 29 Mar 2006, 18:13
Location: Valåmoen, Norway
Contact:

#2207 Post by zigbert »

There are plans to improve the radio module. Atm, the radio db supports only one url pr radio channel. Since many url's in the db is dead, it would be great to allow multiple addresses to each channel, and automatically scan the next address if the given one is dead. The pMusic radio db is built from the info at radiosure.com, and it includes limitless numbers of url's. So, the challenge is not to find the url's, but to define a clever way to include this into pMusic.

sheldonisaac
Posts: 902
Joined: Mon 22 Jun 2009, 01:36
Location: Philadelphia, PA

radio database

#2208 Post by sheldonisaac »

zigbert wrote:There are plans to improve the radio module. Atm, the radio db supports only one url pr radio channel. Since many url's in the db is dead, it would be great to allow multiple addresses to each channel, and automatically scan the next address if the given one is dead. The pMusic radio db is built from the info at radiosure.com, and it includes limitless numbers of url's. So, the challenge is not to find the url's, but to define a clever way to include this into pMusic.
Thank for your reply, Sigmund.

I see that there's nothing I can do here to fix the database.

I added WRTI to favorites, and can choose radio stations from there.

Thanks again,
Sheldon
Dell E6410: BusterPup, BionicPup64, Xenial, etc
Intel DQ35JOE, Dell Vostro 430
Dell Inspiron, Acer Aspire One, EeePC 1018P

live
Posts: 223
Joined: Wed 10 Feb 2010, 21:04

#2209 Post by live »

Thanks for pMusic 5.2.4

Regarding podcast

Feature requests:
On the left pane it would be nice to select which column one wants to display (I'm not interest by default to view path, format, kps, etc.)

Bug
Under TahrPup64
If I add podcast channel http://radiofrance-podcast.net/podcast09/rss_10351.xml

I browse it and select for instance "Anne Pingeot, la discrète révélée (5/5) : Mort et poésie"
pMusic plays sizzled/crackled unhearable sound, while direct play is perfect.

User avatar
zigbert
Posts: 6621
Joined: Wed 29 Mar 2006, 18:13
Location: Valåmoen, Norway
Contact:

#2210 Post by zigbert »

live wrote:Feature requests:
On the left pane it would be nice to select which column one wants to display (I'm not interest by default to view path, format, kps, etc.)
To be considered.
live wrote:Bug
Under TahrPup64
If I add podcast channel http://radiofrance-podcast.net/podcast09/rss_10351.xml

I browse it and select for instance "Anne Pingeot, la discrète révélée (5/5) : Mort et poésie"
pMusic plays sizzled/crackled unhearable sound, while direct play is perfect.
I will check this out

User avatar
zigbert
Posts: 6621
Joined: Wed 29 Mar 2006, 18:13
Location: Valåmoen, Norway
Contact:

#2211 Post by zigbert »

live wrote:Bug
Under TahrPup64
If I add podcast channel http://radiofrance-podcast.net/podcast09/rss_10351.xml

I browse it and select for instance "Anne Pingeot, la discrète révélée (5/5) : Mort et poésie"
pMusic plays sizzled/crackled unhearable sound, while direct play is perfect.
I am not able to reproduce this. I get a nice audio quality in 128kb/sec. Do you get something else?
Attachments
Screenshot(5).jpg
(24.71 KiB) Downloaded 408 times

User avatar
zigbert
Posts: 6621
Joined: Wed 29 Mar 2006, 18:13
Location: Valåmoen, Norway
Contact:

#2212 Post by zigbert »

Have done a test to compare the resource hunger of different players.
See this blogpost

User avatar
greengeek
Posts: 5789
Joined: Tue 20 Jul 2010, 09:34
Location: Republic of Novo Zelande

#2213 Post by greengeek »

Hi Zigbert I just had a look at your comparison and on the basis of your comments i gave Audacious a try (using some pets from an old Pizzasgood thread) on my Slacko derivative.

Interesting player but I saw an unusual pattern of cpu usage within htop. The attached pic shows three instances of Audacious which I cannot explain as only one gui was running. The total is up over 20% cpu usage which is quite different to your figures. Could your comparison figures have included only the cpu percentage of a single Audacious instance and are there always multiple processes running or is it likely I did something wrong?
cheers!

EDIT : I have also added a screenshot of pMusic playing my Music directory for comparison (older version of pMusic that I really like). Nice big fat gui but still lightweight on cpu.
Attachments
audaciousx3.jpg
(63.96 KiB) Downloaded 356 times
pMusic_x3.jpg
(114.25 KiB) Downloaded 350 times

User avatar
zigbert
Posts: 6621
Joined: Wed 29 Mar 2006, 18:13
Location: Valåmoen, Norway
Contact:

#2214 Post by zigbert »

greengeek wrote:Could your comparison figures have included only the cpu percentage of a single Audacious instance and are there always multiple processes running or is it likely I did something wrong?
I use the cpu-average bar to measure, so I think my test shows the correct value. I see you are using the winamp-clone gui that might gives another result. The version I tested ran the gtk-gui by default, so I tested that one.

User avatar
zigbert
Posts: 6621
Joined: Wed 29 Mar 2006, 18:13
Location: Valåmoen, Norway
Contact:

#2215 Post by zigbert »

greengeek wrote:I have also added a screenshot of pMusic playing my Music directory for comparison (older version of pMusic that I really like). Nice big fat gui but still lightweight on cpu.
If using an older version than 5.0.0, it will use slightly more cpu-usage than the most recent versions of pMusic.
http://www.puppylinux.org/wikka/pmusicH ... rce-hunger

User avatar
greengeek
Posts: 5789
Joined: Tue 20 Jul 2010, 09:34
Location: Republic of Novo Zelande

#2216 Post by greengeek »

zigbert wrote:I see you are using the winamp-clone gui that might gives another result. The version I tested ran the gtk-gui by default, so I tested that one.
Oh, ok, thanks - I actually thought my gui was the basic gtk one. Didn't realise it was the winamp one. I will go looking for a different version.
cheers.

User avatar
zigbert
Posts: 6621
Joined: Wed 29 Mar 2006, 18:13
Location: Valåmoen, Norway
Contact:

#2217 Post by zigbert »

Version 5.2.5
See http://www.puppylinux.org/wikka/pmusicInstall

Changelog - 5.2.5
- Bugfix: Delete multiple files
- Bugfix: Search jamendo gives msg about missing index
- Bugfix: Right-click menu sourcelist: (Re)set source in pmu
- Bugfix: Expand several pmu's in sourcelist gives the same id-nr.

User avatar
zigbert
Posts: 6621
Joined: Wed 29 Mar 2006, 18:13
Location: Valåmoen, Norway
Contact:

#2218 Post by zigbert »

Version 5.3.0 - development release
See http://www.puppylinux.org/wikka/pmusicInstall
  • Tabbed playqueues
  • New export window
  • visualization
Attachments
Screenshot(7).jpg
(24.17 KiB) Downloaded 230 times
Screenshot(6).jpg
(30.88 KiB) Downloaded 233 times

jlst

#2219 Post by jlst »

Testing pmusic 5.2.5

I like the fact that it's a tiny frontend for ffmpeg.

It's really fast compared to old versions, which were too heavy on cpu...

I think that searching for music files on first run should be optional, not all people have a permanent install. It's just a suggestion.

Good job.

User avatar
zigbert
Posts: 6621
Joined: Wed 29 Mar 2006, 18:13
Location: Valåmoen, Norway
Contact:

#2220 Post by zigbert »

jlst
Thanks for testing!

There are for sure pros and cons when it comes to scanning at first run. I have tried to make it as discreet as possible. pMusic is built around the DB, so a scan is required to take advantage of the features in pMusic. But, of course not required to play audio - which is the main target.

One solution could be to offer a simple frontend without scanning. Focusing on a basic audioplayer without too many options and features. The downside would be the slow file-search.

Post Reply