It can't find /ibiblio/distributions/puppylinux/puppy-tahr/iso/tahrpup -6.0-CE/ server and I can't remember how I got the devx_tahr_6.0.5.sfs I keep in a pendrive I'm currently using with Tahrpup6.0.5.
I would like to know what is the version of the gcc I have used.
Can you please tell me if there's some way to get to know that?
Thank you in advance
Edited twice on Monday 13 Feb to improve wording, because the problem has been solved and because of a typo.
which gcc version am I using? SOLVED
which gcc version am I using? SOLVED
Last edited by Antipodal on Mon 13 Feb 2017, 17:51, edited 2 times in total.
Posting from a P4 3Ghz_ASUS P5G41T-M LX3_2G RAM_DVD Write desktop with no internal HDD
Saving my stuff on flash sticks and in external USB HDD
Saving my stuff on flash sticks and in external USB HDD
Hello Antipodal
Open a terminal and typeIt will give you the info you're looking for.
BFN.
Open a terminal and type
Code: Select all
gcc --versionBFN.
musher0
~~~~~~~~~~
"You want it darker? We kill the flame." (L. Cohen)
~~~~~~~~~~
"You want it darker? We kill the flame." (L. Cohen)
musher0 wrote:Hello Antipodal
Open a terminal and typeIt will give you the info you're looking for.Code: Select all
gcc --version
BFN.
Hi Antipodal & Musher,
Along with Musher's "gcc" command, maybe this command will also help you too:
Code: Select all
ldd --version
Hello Semme, musher0 and belham2
I would like to thank you for your input.
In a chronological order
I spent a long time trying to fit "-help" into the appropriate context but
always failed. I have just discovered your advice was to
use "--help". Sorry indeed.
The same thing happened with "gcc --version". Trying to understand what I was
doing wrong I came across this article that made me discover it was my sight
and not your advice that was failing.
Using "gcc --version" the problem was solved immediately.
"ldd --version" caught me alert, with my eyeglasses, and (I thought) with the
problem solved. So I only tried it once.
But it has confused me.
Take a look at why:
After "gcc --version" I thought the version was 4.8.4
But after "ldd --version" I really don't know
Can you tell which is the correct answer?
4.8.4 ?
2.19 ?
Always grateful
Antipodal
I would like to thank you for your input.
In a chronological order
I spent a long time trying to fit "-help" into the appropriate context but
always failed. I have just discovered your advice was to
use "--help". Sorry indeed.
The same thing happened with "gcc --version". Trying to understand what I was
doing wrong I came across this article that made me discover it was my sight
and not your advice that was failing.
Using "gcc --version" the problem was solved immediately.
"ldd --version" caught me alert, with my eyeglasses, and (I thought) with the
problem solved. So I only tried it once.
But it has confused me.
Take a look at why:
Code: Select all
root# gcc --version
gcc (Ubuntu 4.8.4-2ubuntu1~14.04) 4.8.4
Copyright (C) 2013 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
root# ldd --version
ldd (Ubuntu EGLIBC 2.19-0ubuntu6.6) 2.19
Copyright (C) 2014 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Written by Roland McGrath and Ulrich Drepper.But after "ldd --version" I really don't know
Can you tell which is the correct answer?
4.8.4 ?
2.19 ?
Always grateful
Antipodal
Posting from a P4 3Ghz_ASUS P5G41T-M LX3_2G RAM_DVD Write desktop with no internal HDD
Saving my stuff on flash sticks and in external USB HDD
Saving my stuff on flash sticks and in external USB HDD
They are two different piece of software.
gcc outputs the version of gcc https://www.gnu.org/software/gcc/
ldd outputs the version of glibc https://www.gnu.org/software/libc/
These are 2 out of 3 most important pieces of what needs to be in "devx". The last one is "binutils" https://www.gnu.org/software/binutils/, version of which you can get by running "ld --version" (note: "LD" in small letters, with single "d").
PS: Ubuntu seems to use eglibc (http://www.eglibc.org/home) instead of gnu libc (glibc). Note that for all practical purposes eglibc is the same as glibc; in fact, eglibc has closed shop and it has merged itself with glibc.
gcc outputs the version of gcc https://www.gnu.org/software/gcc/
ldd outputs the version of glibc https://www.gnu.org/software/libc/
These are 2 out of 3 most important pieces of what needs to be in "devx". The last one is "binutils" https://www.gnu.org/software/binutils/, version of which you can get by running "ld --version" (note: "LD" in small letters, with single "d").
PS: Ubuntu seems to use eglibc (http://www.eglibc.org/home) instead of gnu libc (glibc). Note that for all practical purposes eglibc is the same as glibc; in fact, eglibc has closed shop and it has merged itself with glibc.
Fatdog64 forum links: [url=http://murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?t=117546]Latest version[/url] | [url=https://cutt.ly/ke8sn5H]Contributed packages[/url] | [url=https://cutt.ly/se8scrb]ISO builder[/url]
Hello Antipodal.
gcc --version > gives you the version of the gcc executable -- only.
ldd --version > gives you the version of the C library (aka "glibc") your
tahrPup is using : 2.19.
The two version numbers are independent. They are evolved independently
as well, by two different teams of developers.
The same is true for the binutils version number mentioned by jamesbond.
IHTH
gcc --version > gives you the version of the gcc executable -- only.
ldd --version > gives you the version of the C library (aka "glibc") your
tahrPup is using : 2.19.
The two version numbers are independent. They are evolved independently
as well, by two different teams of developers.
The same is true for the binutils version number mentioned by jamesbond.
IHTH
musher0
~~~~~~~~~~
"You want it darker? We kill the flame." (L. Cohen)
~~~~~~~~~~
"You want it darker? We kill the flame." (L. Cohen)
