The time now is Mon 16 Dec 2019, 08:37
All times are UTC - 4 |
Page 23 of 35 [514 Posts] |
Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3, ..., 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, ..., 33, 34, 35 Next |
Author |
Message |
peebee

Joined: 21 Sep 2008 Posts: 4099 Location: Worcestershire, UK
|
Posted: Tue 11 Apr 2017, 09:53 Post subject:
|
|
Pepperflash update to 25.0.0.148:
chromium_57.0.2987.98-i486+pepper_25.0.0.148_lx.sfs
chromium64_57.0.2987.98+pepper_25.0.0.148_lx.sfs
_________________
LxPup = Puppy + LXDE
Main version used daily: LxPupSc; Assembler of UPups, ScPup & ScPup64, LxPup, LxPupSc & LxPupSc64
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
DAC324
Joined: 18 Jul 2015 Posts: 12
|
Posted: Sat 15 Apr 2017, 15:41 Post subject:
|
|
Hello,
this version throws the following errors:
Quote: | /usr/lib/chromium/chromium: /lib/libdbus-1.so.3: no version information available (required by /usr/lib/chromium/chromium)
/usr/lib/chromium/chromium: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/chromium/chromium: undefined symbol: g_type_check_instance_is_fundamentally_a
| How can this be fixed?
Kind regards,
DAC324
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
peebee

Joined: 21 Sep 2008 Posts: 4099 Location: Worcestershire, UK
|
Posted: Sat 15 Apr 2017, 17:40 Post subject:
|
|
DAC324 wrote: | Hello,
this version throws the following errors:
Quote: | /usr/lib/chromium/chromium: /lib/libdbus-1.so.3: no version information available (required by /usr/lib/chromium/chromium)
/usr/lib/chromium/chromium: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/chromium/chromium: undefined symbol: g_type_check_instance_is_fundamentally_a
| How can this be fixed?
Kind regards,
DAC324 |
On which pup????
see http://www.murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?p=935521#935521
Only runs on "modern" pups as described.
_________________
LxPup = Puppy + LXDE
Main version used daily: LxPupSc; Assembler of UPups, ScPup & ScPup64, LxPup, LxPupSc & LxPupSc64
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
DAC324
Joined: 18 Jul 2015 Posts: 12
|
Posted: Sat 15 Apr 2017, 18:00 Post subject:
|
|
peebee wrote: | DAC324 wrote: | Hello,
this version throws the following errors:
Quote: | /usr/lib/chromium/chromium: /lib/libdbus-1.so.3: no version information available (required by /usr/lib/chromium/chromium)
/usr/lib/chromium/chromium: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/chromium/chromium: undefined symbol: g_type_check_instance_is_fundamentally_a
| How can this be fixed?
Kind regards,
DAC324 |
On which pup????
see http://www.murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?p=935521#935521
Only runs on "modern" pups as described. | TahrPup 6.0.5 - it is, unfortunately, not listed in the linked posting. Apparently, TahrPup is also considered "old".
Kind regards,
DAC324
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Mike Walsh

Joined: 28 Jun 2014 Posts: 5673 Location: King's Lynn, UK.
|
Posted: Sat 15 Apr 2017, 18:32 Post subject:
|
|
Hi, DAC324.
Mm. It's a well-known fact that Chromium (upon which a multitude of other browsers are based...including Chrome itself) is always compiled under the newest versions of the glibc (the general 'C' library). peebee's been having various problems with recent releases because of this.
Google themselves re-compile it for Chrome under a much older glibc to maintain compatibility for the largest possible user-base. As do the builders of SlimJet, Iron and Vivaldi (all of which are Chromium-based, and all of which are available here on the forums.)
Just FYI.
Mike.
_________________ MY 'PUPPY' PACKAGES

Last edited by Mike Walsh on Sun 16 Apr 2017, 15:48; edited 1 time in total
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Moat

Joined: 16 Jul 2013 Posts: 968 Location: Mid-mitten
|
Posted: Sat 15 Apr 2017, 18:54 Post subject:
|
|
Hmmm... If you haven't already done it - I recall TahrPup has an updated glibc available in either Quickpet or the Tahr updates app (??). I also recall using it (i.e. - updating glibc) on any TahrPup installs I've done, and had no issues with it breaking the system. Although a huge YMMV if you give that a try... back things up first!! Might be worth a shot...
Bob
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Mike Walsh

Joined: 28 Jun 2014 Posts: 5673 Location: King's Lynn, UK.
|
Posted: Sun 16 Apr 2017, 06:20 Post subject:
|
|
Morning, Bob.
Moat wrote: | If you haven't already done it - I recall TahrPup has an updated glibc available in either Quickpet or the Tahr updates app (??). I also recall using it (i.e. - updating glibc) on any TahrPup installs I've done, and had no issues with it breaking the system. |
Is that the one that's supposed to be the repair 'fix' for that vulnerability that was discovered with the glibc, a while back? I put it 'on ice', right at the beginning; I wasn't certain I wanted to use it, since I knew messing around with the glibc was liable to 'break' things if you weren't careful.....
You say you've found it works OK?
Mike.
_________________ MY 'PUPPY' PACKAGES

|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Moat

Joined: 16 Jul 2013 Posts: 968 Location: Mid-mitten
|
Posted: Sun 16 Apr 2017, 15:26 Post subject:
|
|
Hi Mike -
Mike Walsh wrote: | Is that the one that's supposed to be the repair 'fix' for that vulnerability that was discovered with the glibc, a while back? ...
You say you've found it works OK? |
DoH! You are right, and it's just a security update - and not a version upgrade (I just checked, and the updated version remains at 2.19). So, likely not applicable to DAC324's issue. Dang it...
And yes - I've never experienced any particular issues after installing the update. Has been working OK for me, anyway...
Kinda' pitiful that an LTS Linux release from only three years ago (and officially supported for two more) is based upon a lib structure that's already treated (abandoned?) as obsolete by application/package builders. More of that mixed-up, non-collaborative world of Linux, I guess - eh?!
Bob
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Mike Walsh

Joined: 28 Jun 2014 Posts: 5673 Location: King's Lynn, UK.
|
Posted: Sun 16 Apr 2017, 15:53 Post subject:
|
|
Moat wrote: | Kinda' pitiful that an LTS Linux release from only three years ago (and officially supported for two more) is based upon a lib structure that's already treated (abandoned?) as obsolete by application/package builders. More of that mixed-up, non-collaborative world of Linux, I guess - eh?! |
'Nuff said, mate.... but yes, it IS 'pitiful'. And the stupid thing is that these older versions of the glibc are still perfectly functional, of course.
Though I'm certainly not knocking Linux maintainers for trying to maintain the general level of security. Far from it.
Mike.
_________________ MY 'PUPPY' PACKAGES

Last edited by Mike Walsh on Tue 18 Apr 2017, 19:13; edited 1 time in total
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
haywirepc
Joined: 19 Nov 2009 Posts: 132
|
Posted: Tue 18 Apr 2017, 09:05 Post subject:
|
|
I am using tahrpup linux 6.05 and tried to install this latest 32 bit chromium sfs. Sfs installs, but I get this error when attempting to load chromium :
/usr/lib/chromium/chromium: /lib/libdbus-1.so.3: no version information available (required by /usr/lib/chromium/chromium)
/usr/lib/chromium/chromium: /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.20' not found (required by /usr/lib/chromium/chromium)
Can anyone help me fix this? I have all tahrpup updates installed already.
I don't see glibc 3.4.20 or anything close in the repos.
Desperately want to get this working...
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
peebee

Joined: 21 Sep 2008 Posts: 4099 Location: Worcestershire, UK
|
Posted: Tue 18 Apr 2017, 13:11 Post subject:
|
|
haywirepc wrote: | I am using tahrpup linux 6.05 and tried to install this latest 32 bit chromium sfs. Sfs installs, but I get this error when attempting to load chromium :
/usr/lib/chromium/chromium: /lib/libdbus-1.so.3: no version information available (required by /usr/lib/chromium/chromium)
/usr/lib/chromium/chromium: /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.20' not found (required by /usr/lib/chromium/chromium)
Can anyone help me fix this? I have all tahrpup updates installed already.
I don't see glibc 3.4.20 or anything close in the repos.
Desperately want to get this working... |
Hi
Best advice if you want cutting-edge is to upgrade your system to XenialPup....
Best I can offer for older systems like TahrPup is:
chromium_56.0.2924.76+pepper_25.0.0.148_pg.sfs
_________________
LxPup = Puppy + LXDE
Main version used daily: LxPupSc; Assembler of UPups, ScPup & ScPup64, LxPup, LxPupSc & LxPupSc64
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
rufwoof

Joined: 24 Feb 2014 Posts: 3681
|
Posted: Wed 19 Apr 2017, 08:42 Post subject:
|
|
I run a Debian based frugal boot and Debian programs tend to be dated (but very stable). The core stability and security updates suites my needs. For other more adventurous stuff I can run that in a VirtualBox. For instance this is a session that runs LMDE (Mint Mate) iso as a live-boot, into which the latest Google Chrome has been installed. Save the session as a snapshot and you can jump straight back to where the snapshot was made without having to wait for the ISO to boot, download chrome ...etc again.
A factor however is that the likes of WebGL (new google earth for instance) might not run (doesn't for me at least) as the VirtualBox doesn't seem to support that (or my hardware isn't up to it as I run on pretty old kit).
A benefit is that the virtual box session is contained and any screw-up's in that don't affect your stable core system. That virtualbox session was run in a restricted environment i.e. another user account that is tied down to use restricted bash (rbash) and has no su or sudo access. I use that for online stuff and have another userid for where all personal data/docs are stored. True multi-user is one of the benefits of the Dogs over the Pups (FatDog, DebianDog, XenialDog). Ctrl-Alt-Fn switches to another console where you can log in to another user id (once you've set them up). You can also use permissions (chown, chgrp, chmod) to restrict access to folders/files from certain user id's.
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
roadkill13
Joined: 10 Aug 2011 Posts: 155 Location: United States
|
Posted: Sat 06 May 2017, 21:00 Post subject:
|
|
Quote: | /usr/lib/chromium/chromium: /lib/libdbus-1.so.3: no version information available (required by /usr/lib/chromium/chromium)
/usr/lib/chromium/chromium: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/chromium/chromium: undefined symbol: g_type_check_instance_is_fundamentally_a |
I experienced this issue when I tried to use the 32 bit package for Chromium 57 from this thread on TahrPup 6.06. I do not recall why I downloaded this package instead of opting for the one in the PPM from Ubuntu Universe repo.
I did install Chromium 58 from the PPM on a fresh save folder today and everything is working fine. I am running Chromium as user Spot.
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
peebee

Joined: 21 Sep 2008 Posts: 4099 Location: Worcestershire, UK
|
Posted: Wed 10 May 2017, 05:18 Post subject:
|
|
Pepperflash update to 25.0.0.171:
chromium_57.0.2987.98-i486+pepper_25.0.0.171_lx.sfs
chromium64_57.0.2987.98+pepper_25.0.0.171_lx.sfs
_________________
LxPup = Puppy + LXDE
Main version used daily: LxPupSc; Assembler of UPups, ScPup & ScPup64, LxPup, LxPupSc & LxPupSc64
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
peebee

Joined: 21 Sep 2008 Posts: 4099 Location: Worcestershire, UK
|
Posted: Sat 13 May 2017, 02:45 Post subject:
chromium_58.0.3029.96+pepper_25.0.0.171 |
|
32-bit:
chromium_58.0.3029.96+pepper_25.0.0.171_lx.sfs
64-bit:
chromium64_58.0.3029.96+pepper_25.0.0.171_lx.sfs
Tested on:
slacko-6.9.6.4
xenialpup-7.0.8.1
slacko64-6.9.6.4
probably unlikely to work on anything older....
_________________
LxPup = Puppy + LXDE
Main version used daily: LxPupSc; Assembler of UPups, ScPup & ScPup64, LxPup, LxPupSc & LxPupSc64
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
|
Page 23 of 35 [514 Posts] |
Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3, ..., 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, ..., 33, 34, 35 Next |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|