Puppy releases

What features/apps/bugfixes needed in a future Puppy
Message
Author
User avatar
mavrothal
Posts: 3096
Joined: Mon 24 Aug 2009, 18:23

Puppy releases

#1 Post by mavrothal »

I should admit that I’m not really involved in puppy for quite some time now but I couldn’t help but notice a stagnation in the "final" release of new puppies.
By now “official
Last edited by mavrothal on Wed 02 Aug 2017, 10:49, edited 2 times in total.
== [url=http://www.catb.org/esr/faqs/smart-questions.html]Here is how to solve your[/url] [url=https://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/bugs.html]Linux problems fast[/url] ==

belham2
Posts: 1715
Joined: Mon 15 Aug 2016, 22:47

Re: Puppy releases

#2 Post by belham2 »

mavrothal wrote:I should admit that I’m not really involved in puppy for quite some time now....

It is clear that puppylinux after BK, does not have any full time developer/builder to push things forward....

I would suggest it is time puppylinux to follow the FatDog example, where an OS is released by 2 (or more) persons, so when one is busy it can go on with the other(s)..

Hi Mavrothal,

Did the irony of what you wrote (highlighted above) not hit you between the eyes? You summarily put the nail in the wood, picked up the hammer, place your thumb directly on top of the nail, and swung the hammer 8) And I mean this with all the respect you richly deserve (as you're one of our gurus here, and we can't afford to lose anymore such as you) :wink:


You remember Porteus, before how it is now in its recent form (where it's regressed to doing what has happened here in puppyland)? Going to Porteus' old homepage, it was a beautiful one page layout that greeted you with simple "build & customize" layout that let you completely build the OS of your choice, with what you wanted in it, and it happened right there and you could download your build in short order. The thrill was incredible. It was tangible. And even a novice could understand how to choose OS-bit type, the desktop choice, to what they wanted in it (within reason), to time/date/etc simple configs, to browser choice, to email client choice, chat, etc, and a few other thingss. It was seductive. It was wonderful. It showed a glimpse of a future that "could be". Remember that?

In my honest opinion, this is what Woof-CE has the potential to achieve. Our greatest strength, the absolute uncontrolled diversity of different pups and pup-related distros, is also our greatest weakness, and it is the very thing causing, as you wrote, the stagnation (possibly a bit too strong a word to describe things). Currently, regarding woof-CE, the problem is it seems it has only really been jilst, doing way too much, trying to keep the whole thing together. A few of the builders, like micko, also try to keep their respective woof-CE builds up-to-date & working. But there needs and should be so much more. The future is here in this path forward. Thus, my opinion is the "push" should be here, at woof-CE, and not on individual releases anymore.

Billtoo, and Sailor, two of the overall user-side of woof-CE build virtuosos I've learned from, are the shining examples of what Woof-CE could become. I mean, they made me into a builder, using the Woof-CE process. Imagine what would happen in puppyland if the Woof-CE process was brought to the level of what the old Porteus home build page used to be, where anyone could show up at Porteus and feel INCREDIBLE as their custom-build was made. Imagine a Woof-Ce singular home page, and do a build all by just clicking their mouse. Just imagine what this could become. And the flowering it would unleash.

The constant refrain I hear from friends, when I turn them on to puppy, whether it is a pup and/or pup-related build, is that they get lost & overwhelmed at the wildness of choices. It is "not" that a builder disappears and/or moves on with their life, it is the overwhelming feeling of these choices. It turns them off, quickly. As hard as it is to understand, let alone accept, we humans struggle we presented with a wild orgy of choices. Wild gobs of choices are great for those that enter the food-pit to eat (a metaphor describing us regulars here), but as it stands now these gobs of choices are a massive turn-off for all and anyone else.

You know, there is currently a puppy-murga-land killer out there, and it is called Sparky-Linux. They are clearly a puppy-wannabe, but they are going the route of offering many different looking DE builds & choices within based off of singular custom build base(s) that the user-builder will eventually control & choose. They are soon, it is rumored, going to be tinkering with what Porteus used to do with that old hompe page build style. If this happens, murga here will fall even more precipitously off the map than it already is. Thus, iImagine if Woof-CE, now, did this, giving the user the thrill, satisfaction, incipient curiousity satiated, of clicking through & doing a custom-build themselves. Again, I say, if this happened, murga & puppy-verse would experience a new bursting-forth, a new explosion, and the beautiful thing is the whole process would keep reinforcing itself. And for any claims that this approach would kill off individuality and expression and such, then the point is being missed. The wildness of expression, individuality, and such, could be expressed INSIDE woof-CE IF that person puts his/her choices inside the build process. Something that is easily done, yet it all is corralled, focused, and made "simply sexy" by the porteus-build like approach of the new woof-CE.

backi
Posts: 1922
Joined: Sun 27 Feb 2011, 22:00
Location: GERMANY

#3 Post by backi »

Hi belham !
Interesting read .Yes all you mentioned is a serious threat for Puppies further progress .

Your post should give everyone some clues for seriously contemplating about ( this Porteus thing ).
I wished this post would be recognized from a lot of readers .

Regards !

User avatar
8Geee
Posts: 2181
Joined: Mon 12 May 2008, 11:29
Location: N.E. USA

#4 Post by 8Geee »

One of the items not mentioned in the above discussion is the kernel . This is perhaps the most difficult aspect of distro-building. Consider that a rather small enclave of users still use 32-bit, many use 64-bit, some are using risc processing, and some are using "proprietary" builds. Theres UEFI everywhere except for the small enclave of 32-bit users.

The driver list has become ginormous, trying to satisfy all end-users. And again theres proprietary workarounds. IMHO almost every new end-product comes with a decidedly unique set of drivers. This simply bloats a "universal" kernel. At some point, thers going to be a need to split the kernel according to general usage (say 64-bit and RISC) because the diversity no longer overlaps. IIRC theres i586 (pae/non-pae), i64, AMD_64, and RISC compatability. Figuring what can be removed is not a superficial task. /MHO

Before we get there, lets consider the large field of diversity. It was simpler years back, because the computing world was simpler.

Regards
8Geee
Linux user #498913 "Some people need to reimagine their thinking."
"Zuckerberg: a large city inhabited by mentally challenged people."

musher0
Posts: 14629
Joined: Mon 05 Jan 2009, 00:54
Location: Gatineau (Qc), Canada

#5 Post by musher0 »

Hello mavrothal and all.

The DPupStretch Woof-CE came out 3-4 months ago, and a lot of talented
people used it to create their variant. Some were of outstanding quality.

But none of the gurus suggested one as the official new Puppy. I believe
it would be 01micko's role to give one the offical Puppy status. Is there
someone else with that capacity? (You, perhaps?)

If any other dev sticks his/her neck out and publishes his/her DPupStretch,
(s)he will have to advertise it as a Puppy variant at DistroWatch and
elsewhere, not as an official Puppy.

Another thing is worthy of mention: every dev interested in DPupStretch
is waiting for its Woof-CE to obtain "release" status. (Although even at
"alpha1" stage, it is quite good, IMO.)

Puppy is far from dead. It is #1 AFAICT on DistroWatch on their
user-satisfaction scale.

But I think we lack someone with the get-up-and-go to officialize and
promote DPupStretch-7.

BFN.
musher0
~~~~~~~~~~
"You want it darker? We kill the flame." (L. Cohen)

User avatar
Moat
Posts: 955
Joined: Tue 16 Jul 2013, 06:04
Location: Mid-mitten

#6 Post by Moat »

And then Fred goes and posts this today;

http://www.murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?t=111199

... with but a few clicks of the mouse, you'll have ya' a small, fully functional Porteus-boot/save Debian Stretch .iso. Create a "Puppyfying mega pack" .deb (and/or repo) that includes a full selection of the outstanding and unique Puppy apps from the likes of SFR, Ziggy, Micko, Mav, Radky, Geoffrey, rcsn51, Barry, Don, et all... BINGO! A largely self-maintaining (via Debian's native apt/Synaptic mechanism) Puppy - ready to rock.

Let us end-users modify/tweak and remaster spins to our heart's desire, and throw 'em up here on the forum as derivatives, for all the world to use. Have peebee, rg66 and Geoffrey work their incomparable magic on Lxde and Xfce spins. BAM! 8)

Just a thought... one that appears to bypass a great deal of the complexity in understanding, maintaining and building via the Woof-CE route. That, to me, seems as if it could be a huge step in assuring Puppy's sustainability, flexibility and viability moving forward. It potentially eliminates a great deal of the time and effort that our few leading devs simply can't keep up with on their own (nor should these good folks have to!), and ultimately led to the reason behind this very thread.

JMHO and thoughts! Am I dreaming... :?:

Bob

musher0
Posts: 14629
Joined: Mon 05 Jan 2009, 00:54
Location: Gatineau (Qc), Canada

#7 Post by musher0 »

Hello all.

It happened today:

pelo is giving me flak because I'm not publishing a final DpupStretch-7_fr.
http://murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic. ... ost#962674

« Je crois qu'il est grand temps que tu fasses une [é]dition publique. »
Transl.:"I believe it is high time that you do a public edition."

Wait a minute. If I publish a final DpupStretch-7_fr based (word added)
on a Woof-CE that says DPupStretch-7 is still in "alpha1" stage, I'll be the
laughing stock of the entire Linux world.

So please, if one of Puppy's Superior Powers could bring the DPupStretch-
7 to "release" status, it would be greatly appreciated.

I'm not taking flak for something that's not my fault.

If DPupStretch-7 achieves release status and I do publish a French variant,
I'm sure pelo will find another reason to give me flak, but that's another
matter entirely! :lol:

~~~~~~~~~

Another thought about DPupStretch-7. We had a Puppy "stretch" ready to
go before Debian had its own Stretch out. We could have pulled the rug
underneath them if we had played our cards right. Now we've lost that
momentum, and it's entirely our fault.

Best regards.
Last edited by musher0 on Wed 02 Aug 2017, 07:55, edited 1 time in total.
musher0
~~~~~~~~~~
"You want it darker? We kill the flame." (L. Cohen)

Robert123
Posts: 362
Joined: Fri 20 May 2016, 05:22
Location: Pacific

#8 Post by Robert123 »


pelo is giving me flak because I'm not publishing a final DpupStretch-7_fr.


Colour me surprised (sarcasm)
Devuan Linux, Stardust 013 (4.31) updated [url]https://archive.org/details/Stardustpup013glibc2.10[/url]
s57(2018)barebone[url]https://sourceforge.net/projects/puppy-linux-minimal-builds/files/s57%282018%29barebones.iso/download[/url]

belham2
Posts: 1715
Joined: Mon 15 Aug 2016, 22:47

#9 Post by belham2 »

musher0 wrote:Hello all.

It happened today:

pelo is giving me flak because I'm not publishing a final DpupStretch-7_fr.
http://murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic. ... ost#962674

« Je crois qu'il est grand temps que tu fasses une [é]dition publique. »
Transl.:"I believe it is high time that you do a public edition."

LOL :lol:

Musher, I feel like it is almost a "rite of passage" thing, almost like a religious experience, to be attacked & villified by the great Oracle of Paris Pelo (aka O.P.P.). Many months back, O.P.P. ripped me & my released version of Dpup-Stretch quite royally, scolding me up & down like I was a school kid who just got caught with his hand in the cookie jar.

So, in my eyes, it's part of the grand ceremony here: you do not make it into the upper Pantheon of Murga Island unless O.P.P. has imparted upon you the rites of passage. I almost cried tears of joy when the great Oracle himself deigned to respond in my poor little dpup-stretch release thread and without so much as a "hello", began his pronouncements telling me how so close to the devil it & I had become. It still gives me goosebumps, remembering waking up that day & seeing the imprimatur of the Holy O.P.P. gracing my thread. :roll: :wink:

backi
Posts: 1922
Joined: Sun 27 Feb 2011, 22:00
Location: GERMANY

#10 Post by backi »

Hi belham !
Looks like your suffering in the "Dark Night of the Soul " was not in vain.
For me as an interested "Passenger" it is always a pleasure to read your humorous ,entertaining and intelligent suggestion.....a bit kick-ass seems to work .

jd7654
Posts: 296
Joined: Mon 06 Apr 2015, 16:10

Re: Puppy releases

#11 Post by jd7654 »

belham2 wrote:...
The constant refrain I hear from friends, when I turn them on to puppy, whether it is a pup and/or pup-related build, is that they get lost & overwhelmed at the wildness of choices. It is "not" that a builder disappears and/or moves on with their life, it is the overwhelming feeling of these choices. It turns them off, quickly. As hard as it is to understand, let alone accept, we humans struggle we presented with a wild orgy of choices. Wild gobs of choices are great for those that enter the food-pit to eat (a metaphor describing us regulars here), but as it stands now these gobs of choices are a massive turn-off for all and anyone else.
...
To me, this is the main issue with current state of Puppy: too much fragmentation.
Not just too many choices, but without the creator BK's leadership, lack of *official* choices.
There are many fine developers and I'm sure most are good people. But myself and others just don't really want to run "some random guy's distro spin."

That's not meant as an insult, but partly for security reasons. An official release with a large following and user base will have lots of bug testing and feature testing. A lone spin, which may be great and all that, will be missing out on all that testing. People don't want to trust their system to some untrusted perpetual alpha product.

As for the current state, I just saw that the mainline UPup developer has moved on? And the SPup release has slowed down. I like SPup, but Slackware is falling. UPup will always be a good choice, but Debian seems to be gaining favor and would be really nice to see an official DPup release. Otherwise Puppy will continue to drop in Distrowatch rankings.

And then there are the Dogs. Seems to be more activity on the Dog side, at least on the forums. That also adds to confusion for new users coming to the forums, need some distinction between Puppy and Dog distros. But the Dogs don't have the following and user base to match the bug and feature testing that Puppy once had.. It could be, but again need to reduce choices, come up with a main Dog release, with different desktop options, but not treated as even more distro choices.

User avatar
bigpup
Posts: 13886
Joined: Sun 11 Oct 2009, 18:15
Location: S.C. USA

#12 Post by bigpup »

The captain of the Puppy ship (as I understand) is suppose to be 01micko.

I know he cannot do this as a full time job (as Barry K. did)
He has a full time paying job!

So, Puppy is what it is.

Does anyone really know what or if Puppy has now a organization structure of any kind?
Other people with responsibility to help 01micko handle some of these issues you talk about here?

I know there is a loose Woof CE membership for working on Woof CE.
The things they do not tell you, are usually the clue to solving the problem.
When I was a kid I wanted to be older.... This is not what I expected :shock:
YaPI(any iso installer)

User avatar
mavrothal
Posts: 3096
Joined: Mon 24 Aug 2009, 18:23

#13 Post by mavrothal »

I know that this forum is mostly a "watering hole" where (the most vocal) people comment (on what ever is in their mind and) usually off-topic, but this is what defines puppy forum as "very friendly forum". So is fine.
However let me try to restate the point i tried to raise as I'm afraid is lost in the "noise".
This is not about puppy organisation ( :shock: ), puppy build system ( :evil: ), if puppy should become something else ( :roll: ) and the other "usual" commends that appear in this forum given the (remote) opportunity (or without it :lol: ).

It is about the Puppy release process hampered by the "real life" of the developers and specifically about
a) the existing puppy builders (mainly @666philb, @01micko and maybe @jlst) to "officially invite" help in building and releasing S/U/Dpuppy 7+ and
b) people that already building woof-ce puppies in private, to come forward, contact the said developers and release the said puppy together (a la kirk/jamesbond).

Regarding Dpup I do not know... looks like @pemasu has cursed the debian builds in this forum... :P
== [url=http://www.catb.org/esr/faqs/smart-questions.html]Here is how to solve your[/url] [url=https://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/bugs.html]Linux problems fast[/url] ==

cthisbear
Posts: 4422
Joined: Sun 29 Jan 2006, 22:07
Location: Sydney Australia

#14 Post by cthisbear »

" It is about the Puppy release process hampered by the "real life" of the developers. "

""""""""
People get busy...life gets in the way.
That's how it is.

As long as Mr Murga allows this forum to run unhampered I am
prepared to wait.

For me I like it simple.
It boots to desktop.
It connects.
I can fix crapped out computers.
I can connect phones.

When someone gets my printer working out of the box...
that will be a first for me.

No reflection on >>> rcrsn51 and others.
Just my poor effort in following instructions.

"""""

DPupStretch Woof-CE

http://murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?t=109789

A few small faults but I've booted this on a few dogs - and it just
satisfies.

Hoping Mr ttuuxxx will do a follow up.

Lucid is still a favourite.

Uncle Barry's Puppy Precise 5.61 is still good...I just update the browsers.

As long as newbies and others are helped Puppy has a future.

A few more joining in for the conversation would be nice for a change.

The Puppy Forum is still a smiley world for me.

Cheers mavrothal.

Chris.

User avatar
torm
Posts: 186
Joined: Sat 07 Mar 2015, 19:56

#15 Post by torm »

..maybe "Unfinished" section? From small *.c to full ISO-s?

To clear some doupts and gather people around?

Pelo

Puppy would have only developers as users. Build your OS...

#16 Post by Pelo »

When i read the forum nowadays, Puppy would have only developers as users. Build your OS...
You could understand that people will trust old puppies, not to spend time on searching repairs to bugs..
You can develop Ferraris, or a water powered car, or a rocket aircraft, for your pleasure..
What we need is that you ask people what they want, and then that you brainstorm to make it.. :twisted:
See other topics in suggestions, and try to realize what is asked, sure it's not funny..
Documentations, help desk, translations;; packages, compiling for users..
You build so many boats, but none of you would try it on the water.
Without release, you are in brainstorming.. Do you think your brainstorming is worth so many pages ?
so many Puppies, abandoned as fast as build. Production line produces , but customers are gone.

If a Puppy is not for public release, keep it at home, do your tests at home ! don't shot the testers, anymore !

User avatar
torm
Posts: 186
Joined: Sat 07 Mar 2015, 19:56

#17 Post by torm »

@Pelo
this is not RedHat or SUSE. Or pure Debian... there are no customers.
Or OpenSuse. Or testers.
Don't drain out the fun from devs, or You'll have nothing to play with in a littlewhile.
dl AssaultCube if You like to shoot or get shot at :D

labbe5 has pretty good link here, where it comes to this topic:
http://murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?t=111209

Robert123
Posts: 362
Joined: Fri 20 May 2016, 05:22
Location: Pacific

Re: Puppy would have only developers as users. Build your OS...

#18 Post by Robert123 »

Pelo wrote:When i read the forum nowadays, Puppy would have only developers as users. Build your OS...
You could understand that people will trust old puppies, not to spend time on searching repairs to bugs..
You can develop Ferraris, or a water powered car, or a rocket aircraft, for your pleasure..
What we need is that you ask people what they want, and then that you brainstorm to make it.. :twisted:
See other topics in suggestions, and try to realize what is asked, sure it's not funny..
Documentations, help desk, translations;; packages, compiling for users..
You build so many boats, but none of you would try it on the water.
Without release, you are in brainstorming.. Do you think your brainstorming is worth so many pages ?
so many Puppies, abandoned as fast as build. Production line produces , but customers are gone.

If a Puppy is not for public release, keep it at home, do your tests at home ! don't shot the testers, anymore !
If people are having fun developing their own and some sharing those results then so be it. Can't say I'm worried about the lack of a new official Pup - Distrowatch or the demands of a certain user.

Developers obviously real world other demands beyond Puppy.
Devuan Linux, Stardust 013 (4.31) updated [url]https://archive.org/details/Stardustpup013glibc2.10[/url]
s57(2018)barebone[url]https://sourceforge.net/projects/puppy-linux-minimal-builds/files/s57%282018%29barebones.iso/download[/url]

Sailor Enceladus
Posts: 1543
Joined: Mon 22 Feb 2016, 19:43

#19 Post by Sailor Enceladus »

Very interesting thread. The woof-CE Master branch was last updated Dec 29, 2016 (commit 3790 vs. 5500) and everything since has been added to "Testing" or "Rationlise". Perhaps all the changes to master that are deemed "safe" or "bugfixes" can be backported to that branch (or master-new)? mavrothal? :twisted: :D https://github.com/puppylinux-woof-CE/w ... ree/master

edit: Hmm I think "master" might still be new enough that using "testing" for changes is ok until 01micko releases Slacko700.

User avatar
sc0ttman
Posts: 2812
Joined: Wed 16 Sep 2009, 05:44
Location: UK

#20 Post by sc0ttman »

Sailor Enceladus wrote:Very interesting thread. The woof-CE Master branch was last updated Dec 29, 2016 (commit 3790 vs. 5500) and everything since has been added to "Testing" or "Rationlise". Perhaps all the changes to master that are deemed "safe" or "bugfixes" can be backported to that branch (or master-new)? mavrothal? :twisted: :D https://github.com/puppylinux-woof-CE/w ... ree/master

edit: Hmm I think "master" might still be new enough that using "testing" for changes is ok until 01micko releases Slacko700.
I think having a master branch which contains only tagged (versioned) releases of woof, that were used to build official pups is the way to go..

People would see nice versioned releases in the Releases page, and would know that each and every commit in the master branch could be used to build an official pup .. just checkout older commits to build the older official pups...

The lack of branch structure in woof-ce is a real pain...
[b][url=https://bit.ly/2KjtxoD]Pkg[/url], [url=https://bit.ly/2U6dzxV]mdsh[/url], [url=https://bit.ly/2G49OE8]Woofy[/url], [url=http://goo.gl/bzBU1]Akita[/url], [url=http://goo.gl/SO5ug]VLC-GTK[/url], [url=https://tiny.cc/c2hnfz]Search[/url][/b]

Post Reply