mavrothal wrote:As far as I know there is no "puppy 7" ever released.666philb wrote:i'll be updating the 32bit xenialpup this coming week and if nothing major is discovered it'll be a 32&64bit 7.0.9 release.
Puppy 7.0.9 or any other point release as "official" after puppy 6.3 would be confusing and may go unnoticed.
You might want to discuss it with Mick and probably PB regarding release schedule and versioning.
Boy, I really don't understand this comment and/or reply.
So Micko releases Slacko 6.9.9.9, and officially calls it 'Slacko 700' in the thread title, then has left it like that for several months now. Phil had his "Xenialpups" marked as "7.0.8.#" for the same amount of time, returns & releases "7.0.8.6" which was much arppeciated. Then phil makes a comment that soon he should be able to go to 7.0.9, and Marvothal writes the above comment?
Can I ask why 7.0.9 is such a problem? Is it the fact it is only 3 numbers in length? Because we all are pretty used to seeing the "7" in front of everything when it comes to releases from both Micko and Phil. And the reference to Peebee? What is that?? His releases are like 17.##.## on the zesty/artful side, and same goes for the LxPupSc side.
Again, it begs the question, why did Phil's comment about going to a "7.0.9" elicit such a response? By reasoning and rationale alone in that comment to Phil, then no one (especially Micko) should ever have written a "7", let alone a "700" (like beside Slacko), correct?