Posted: Sun 19 Jan 2014, 22:06
I have tried Precise Puppy 5.7.1 on three further configurations, all failed to boot & were stuck just before the 'depmod' message should have been displayed.
NB The single core allocated to the VM was maxed out at 100% until the VM was closed:
The 3 configurations were:
1) HP XW6200 (Dual XEON 3.2GHz HT enabled, NO VT-x, 4GB ram),
Win 7 Ultimate 64 bit, VB 4.3.6
2) HP XW6400 (Single XEON 2GHz Quad core, VT-x, 6GB ram),
Win 7 Enterprise 64 bit, VB 4.3.6
3) HP XW6400 (Single XEON 2GHz Quad core, VT-x, 6GB ram),
Linux Mint 13 Cinnamon 64 bit, VB 2.10
[Note each configuration had all the latest OS updates applied.]
This disproves my previous assertion that a system having VT-x enabled with the latest VB 4.3.6 makes the difference. It patently does not & would still seem to be highly dependent upon the actual processor in each configuration.
NB The single core allocated to the VM was maxed out at 100% until the VM was closed:
The 3 configurations were:
1) HP XW6200 (Dual XEON 3.2GHz HT enabled, NO VT-x, 4GB ram),
Win 7 Ultimate 64 bit, VB 4.3.6
2) HP XW6400 (Single XEON 2GHz Quad core, VT-x, 6GB ram),
Win 7 Enterprise 64 bit, VB 4.3.6
3) HP XW6400 (Single XEON 2GHz Quad core, VT-x, 6GB ram),
Linux Mint 13 Cinnamon 64 bit, VB 2.10
[Note each configuration had all the latest OS updates applied.]
This disproves my previous assertion that a system having VT-x enabled with the latest VB 4.3.6 makes the difference. It patently does not & would still seem to be highly dependent upon the actual processor in each configuration.