Posted: Sat 07 Feb 2009, 23:34
Unfortunately this one fails the md5sum check and also won't unpack.Caneri wrote:This is a bit older but it's what was used to do xdelta for some of the people.
READ-ONLY Archive
https://oldforum.puppylinux.com/
Unfortunately this one fails the md5sum check and also won't unpack.Caneri wrote:This is a bit older but it's what was used to do xdelta for some of the people.
I understand your point, my friend, but newbees are not the intended focus for alpha releases. These are strictly for the literati who understand what is required in a testing regimen. I abhor the practice of some of the majors of publicly releasing alphas and betas through Distrowatch for that same reason. It just doesn't make good sense. Wait for the Release Candidate stage to involve newbees in testing IMHO.Béèm wrote:Maybe confusing for newbees who go from a2 to a3.
Thanks aragon.aragon wrote:ok look at this, is the actual one, but completely untested...hope it works
What a boring world it would be if we all agreed about everything!zigbert wrote:I can be totally against his (Warren's) choice of putting in Icewm, but I will surely respect his decision.
Puppy always has been a compromise between function and size. If size were the overriding factor we would all use DSL - it now runs on JWM too!zigbert wrote:I thought Puppys intention is to use the tiniest working alternative.
- I'm NOT against Icewm, but think it fits better as an installable package.
Life as a benevolent dictator can be tough at times. The rewards only come when most people finally recognise that the choices you made, whether they agreed with them or not, were made with the best interest of the whole community at heart. That's where the "benevolent" part kicks in.zigbert wrote:Whatever decision is made for Puppy 4.2, we will have a brilliant OS. It will be something much better than Puppy 4.12.
OK, I am a warned man now and change the way I used to do.WhoDo wrote:It would add just another level of complexity and confusion to the build process for me. I'm struggling as it is!
Except that JWM is ugly to mediocre-looking at best, and changing themes isn't quite as easy as possible; IceWM, with the right themes, is absolutely beautiful, and changing themes is as easy as possible. Looks aren't everything, or even the most important thing, but they're still very important for (1) people getting their first impression of Puppy, (2) many people who use Puppy a lot every day, and (3) probably a lot of other people too. You're complaining about a mere half a megabyte for built-in access to an almost endless abundance of great-looking desktop effects to please almost every taste. Small is beautiful, but even smaller isn't necessarily even more beautiful, and Puppy without IceWM built in would be much less beautiful.zigbert wrote:- Jwm is below 100 kb including all configuration script (guis) and extensions.
- Icewm is 6 times bigger and does the same job as Jwm.
Now that Puppy 4.2 is going to have Tcl/Tk and Gnocl, configuration GUIs with the preferred GTK+ 2.0 look will be pretty easy to produce. Let's hear about some window-manager features people want to configure through a GUI that they can't yet with IceWM.- As far as I know we do not have the same configuration guis for Icewm as Jwm.
I agree. It looks OK (at best), but that's about the best you can say. IceWM can look superb.- Icewm has better theme support, but clever hands on this forum has made Jwm look ok (again my opinion).
If that were uniformly true, AbiWord would have been dumped in favor of TextMaker 2002, which (at least in my experience) actually works better than AbiWord. More to the point, "working" doesn't mean quite the same thing for a window manager as it does for, say, a compiler, a script interpreter, or even an e-mail manager, an editor, or a console. People don't demand that rxvt must be good-looking, but good looks are a large part of what makes a window manager "work" really well in the eyes (literally) of users.- I thought Puppys intention is to use the tiniest working alternative.
Hear, hear!BUT dearest friends. Whatever decision is made for Puppy 4.2, we will have a brilliant OS.
I tend to agree with Zigbert. JWM is more 'sexier' now and I find that icewm doesn't have much more to offer. I would rather choose for Gnome then.WhoDo wrote:Thanks aragon.aragon wrote:ok look at this, is the actual one, but completely untested...hope it works
@Béèm and smokey01 - notecase is 600kb+ and of considerably less interest and appeal than Icewm which is slightly smaller. That's the trade-off I'm dealing with at the moment. Notecase will still be in the official PETget repository, and I'll revisit its inclusion early in the beta phase when I know better where we stand with CUPS which will push us to the limit of our 100Mb self-imposed ceiling.
Could easily have been a bad download. I haven't had time to check. In the meantime aragon has uploaded v3.0u in .pet format so I've added that to the tree. We'll see how it builds. Thanks eric.Caneri wrote:Mine did install..hmmm..I still talk to Tom..I'll ask him if there's a solid xdelta package. On the other hand Pizzasgood and a few others used it as well...
Long, looonnnnggg lunch complete with a good old Aussie barbeque, lots of nice cold beer and plenty of frollicking and fun. My neice and her boyfriend are up from Sydney to see my new granddaughter and to take my Mother-in-Law back with them for a brief holiday with my brother-in-law and his wife.Caneri wrote:Long lunch eh...maybe a cool drink on such a hot day...for me it's freezing and Saturday night..cripes
Was the initrd modification to allow more than three sfs files to be used in a 4.2 frugal to be included in 4.2?Ok, guys, it's the last call for inclusions in Alpha4.