Page 103 of 143

Posted: Wed 01 Aug 2012, 06:39
by Sylvander
1.
bigpup wrote:I am wondering why this computer did not boot.
What is it?
Specs please?
Details of what happens when you try to use Lucid 528.005 on it?
(a)
Mobo = ASRock H61M-S
CPU = 2x Intel Pentium G620T @2.20 Ghz
RAM = 1 stick of 4GB 1333 DDR3
HDD = 250GB SATA; ATA ST250DM000-1BD14
DVD-RW = SATA; TSSTcorp CDDVDW SH222BB
Put together by my local shop, sold for £245.

(b) Can't remember the details, but it just didn't get to the desktop.
Probably due to not having the necessary drivers in the kernel.
Would need to re-make the CD and try it, if you need the details.

Posted: Wed 01 Aug 2012, 06:58
by feelsub
Quote:
Where's the updated download link for Flash?

Update to all versions of Lucid - To install Flashplayer if needed, please update this GetFlash pet -> http://www.murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?t=74491 Or use Google Chrome which has Flashplayer built-in http://www.murga-linux.com/puppy/viewto ... 570#630570
Thanks, would be easier to add this on 1st page of this thread :-)

Posted: Wed 01 Aug 2012, 07:33
by James C
Sylvander wrote: CPU = 2x Intel Pentium G620T @2.20 Ghz
http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q= ... hjKg2FZc6g

Those Sandy Bridge chips had graphics problems until some of the newer kernels.
http://blogs.intel.com/technology/2011/ ... -_it_will/

Even had problems with Ubuntu 11.04
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1817374

You may just need to stick to newer kernels with better Sandy Bridge support. HTH.

Posted: Wed 01 Aug 2012, 13:03
by bigpup
Sylvander,

Thanks for the info.
The hardware target is constantly moving.
Just wondering why I can run Lucid 528.005 on a computer with this processor.
Intel Core i7-2600K Sandy Bridge 3.4GHz (3.8GHz Turbo Boost) LGA 1155 95W Quad-Core Desktop Processor Intel HD Graphics 3000
I am not using the processor on chip graphics.
Using Nvidia Geforce 560 GTX Ti graphics card.
I do have to start with option puppy pfix=nox and run xorgwizard, to use the vesa graphics driver. The NV driver works, but not many resolution options.
Have not tried to install the proper Nvidia driver, yet.

Posted: Wed 01 Aug 2012, 13:32
by Sylvander
playdayz wrote:we have had along and fruitful run but IMHO you should stick with Slacko and begin to customize it to your liking and make suggestions about its future development, software you want, and puplets based on it.
I think that's what I'll do.
I really liked using Lupu, but hey-ho, that's how it goes I guess.
"Onward and upward!" :D

Posted: Wed 01 Aug 2012, 17:51
by sheldonisaac
Sylvander wrote:
playdayz wrote:we have had along and fruitful run but IMHO you should stick with Slacko and begin to customize it to your liking and make suggestions about its future development, software you want, and puplets based on it.
I think that's what I'll do.
I really liked using Lupu, but hey-ho, that's how it goes I guess.
"Onward and upward!" :D
My needs/wants are simple.
214X on this older computer, Lucid Puppy 5.2.8-005 on others.
That should last the rest of my life.

Posted: Wed 01 Aug 2012, 20:53
by playdayz
214X on this older computer, Lucid Puppy 5.2.8-005 on others.
That should last the rest of my life.
On the same computer it should I agree. Sylvander got a new computer and Lucid did not work, so no help but go on to Slacko. Wishing you a long life--so I can see Lucid still used in 2050 ;-)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Google Chrome 21 for Lucid

http://diddywahdiddy.net/Puppy500/Googl ... -Lucid.pet

Flashplayer is built-in so no need to install it.

Posted: Fri 03 Aug 2012, 08:12
by James C
New full install of Lupu Libre 528.005 on my Mageia 2 machine. Zero problems.

sh-4.1# report-video
VIDEO REPORT: Lucid , version 528

Chip description:
oem: NVIDIA
product: MCP61 - mcp61-86 Chip Rev

Driver used by Xorg:
nvidia

Video mode used by Xorg:
Resolution: Depth 24 Depth: "Display"

...the above also recorded in /tmp/report-video

sh-4.1# glxgears
10190 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2038.000 FPS
10978 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2195.600 FPS
10979 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2195.800 FPS
10988 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2197.600 FPS
10976 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2195.200 FPS

-Computer-
Processor : 2x AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 5200+
Memory : 3375MB (220MB used)
Operating System : Unknown distribution
User Name : root (root)
Date/Time : Fri 03 Aug 2012 03:13:27 AM CDT
-Display-
Resolution : 1440x900 pixels
OpenGL Renderer : Unknown
X11 Vendor : The X.Org Foundation
-Multimedia-
Audio Adapter : HDA-Intel - HDA NVidia

sh-4.1# free
total used free shared buffers
Mem: 3375292 359196 3016096 0 45556
Swap: 4300792 0 4300792
Total: 7676084 359196 7316888
sh-4.1#

Still gets the job done....... :)

Posted: Fri 03 Aug 2012, 08:55
by Lobster
Oh yeah. Awesome. Thanks Larry!
. . . wait a minute I am a Slacko user . . . :oops:
. . . only joshing 8)

I was very impressed with Chrome first on Jemima's Puppeee
and then on various Raspberry Pi implementations.
There was some new fangled only on Chrome option I wanted to try . . . can not remember what.

Anyway security enhancements, so tin hats should be happy 8)

Posted: Fri 03 Aug 2012, 14:00
by playdayz
Google Chrome 21 for Lucid
Oh yeah. Awesome. Thanks Larry!
. . . wait a minute I am a Slacko user . . .
Version for Slacko too -> http://www.murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?t=80019

Posted: Sat 04 Aug 2012, 14:52
by ICPUG
Regarding the working of Lupu with recently MANUFACTURED PCs.

I think we found at the very beginning of the introduction of Intel I-core generation 2 PCs (Sandy Bridge?) that Lupu does not boot with the inbuilt Intel graphics. I seem to remember at the time that I said I was OK cos my latest PC is I-core generation 1!

It would seem from what is said here that I-core V2 with a separate Nvidia graphics card is OK, so it is just the all Intel case that is a problem.

I still love Lupu and will use it as long as I can where I can. I recently trialled Slacko 5.3.3 on my more ancient Laptop and was disappointed to find that the settings for the touchpad are still not set up to be as easy to get a touchpad working as it is in Lupu. I reported the problem and solution in earlier versions - easy to solve - nothing done.

Which computers do/don't work with LuPu

Posted: Sat 04 Aug 2012, 15:26
by sheldonisaac
Good morning, ICPUG.
ICPUG wrote: (some snipping)
It would seem from what is said here that I-core V2 with a separate Nvidia graphics card is OK, so it is just the all Intel case that is a problem.
Hm, I will try to find out what my newer computers use.

I think the oldest may be the Dell Latitude D610 laptop - it has some kind of on-board Intel graphics. Oh, just remembered; it has a Centrino? processor?

And also the Dell 8300 desktop may have built-in Intel graphics; not sure at the moment whether I have a separate graphics card in it.

The Acer Aspire One netbook from a few years ago has an Atom N270 processor, and Intel graphics.

Lucid Puppy 5.2.8 works all all of them.

Posted: Sat 04 Aug 2012, 16:15
by Sylvander
Here's my new PC with the ASRock H61M-S mobo on which lupu-528.005 won't load.

It does indeed have a Sandybridge processor with "Integrated Intel HD Graphics".

Posted: Sat 04 Aug 2012, 19:45
by bigpup
Sylvander wrote:Here's my new PC with the ASRock H61M-S mobo on which lupu-528.005 won't load.

It does indeed have a Sandybridge processor with "Integrated Intel HD Graphics".
I wonder what would happen if you tried to boot with option puppy pfix=nox.
Run Xorgwizard to use the Vesa graphics driver.

I am not 100% positive, but I think the big problem with the Intel graphics, built into the processor, is just a needed Linux driver that supports it.
Could also be an issue with the Linux kernel support.
I can say for sure, that a Intel i7 2600K Sandy Bridge, will run Lucid 528.005, if you do not use the processor on chip graphics, but use a separate graphics card.
I have not tried to do it using the on processor graphics, but it seems to be industry standard to support Vesa standards, with any graphics chip.
Seems to me, logic would say, the on processor graphics would support Vesa? What driver runs the graphics before X-server starts?

Posted: Sat 04 Aug 2012, 20:32
by majorfoo
bigpup wrote:
Sylvander wrote:Here's my new PC with the ASRock H61M-S mobo on which lupu-528.005 won't load.

It does indeed have a Sandybridge processor with "Integrated Intel HD Graphics".
I wonder what would happen if you tried to boot with option puppy pfix=nox.
Run Xorgwizard to use the Vesa graphics driver.

I
I had a similar problem trying to boot fatdog64-
Hp dm4-2070 laptop
Intel i5-2410m processor
Intergrated Intel HD Graphics 3000 w/1696mb shared memory

Jamesbond told me to try booting with using nomodeset This worked great. Booted straight to desktop

Don't if this would help in your situation but worth a try

option puppy pfix=nomodeset

Posted: Sat 04 Aug 2012, 20:50
by bigpup
majorfoo
Location: Wish I knew

I know that place. It is next to where you tell your wife you have been for the last 2 hours. Nowhere :shock: :)

Posted: Sat 04 Aug 2012, 21:02
by James C
Just using one of my old test boxes ...... full install of Lucid with a whole 128 mb of ram.Actually pretty usable.

-Computer-
Processor : Celeron (Mendocino)
Memory : 124MB (78MB used)
Operating System : Unknown distribution
User Name : root (root)
Date/Time : Sat 04 Aug 2012 02:46:33 PM CDT
-Display-
Resolution : 1024x768 pixels
OpenGL Renderer : Mesa DRI i810E 20050821 x86/MMX
X11 Vendor : The X.Org Foundation
-Multimedia-
Audio Adapter : ICH - Intel 82801AA-ICH

-Processor-
Name : Celeron (Mendocino)
Family, model, stepping : 6, 6, 5 (Pentium II/Pentium II Xeon/Celeron)
Vendor : Intel
-Configuration-
Cache Size : 128kb
Frequency : 498.29MHz
BogoMIPS : 996.57
Byte Order : Little Endian

-Version-
Kernel : Linux 2.6.33.2 (i686)
Compiled : #1 SMP Thu May 27 10:56:32 EST 2010

Posted: Sat 04 Aug 2012, 21:05
by majorfoo
bigpup wrote:majorfoo
Location: Wish I knew

I know that place. It is next to where you tell your wife you have been for the last 2 hours. Nowhere :shock: :)
The location is where I go to do nothing.
The only problem with doing nothing is that I never know when I am finished.

Posted: Sat 04 Aug 2012, 21:29
by Sylvander
To bigpup and majorfoo:

Tried both commands:
puppy pfix=nomodeset
And...
puppy pfix=nox
Both produced the identical result, which was...
The sfs file could not be found, so loading halted. :(

Posted: Sun 05 Aug 2012, 04:35
by bigpup
Sylvander wrote:To bigpup and majorfoo:

Tried both commands:
puppy pfix=nomodeset
And...
puppy pfix=nox
Both produced the identical result, which was...
The sfs file could not be found, so loading halted. :(
Thanks for trying.
This old Puppy may just not want to play with your new toys.

If you want to keep trying.
Saw a post talking about similar issue and it suggested, may be issue with support for your CD/DVD drive. It suggested boot with a USB flash drive install of Lucid.
Or do this suggested by rcrsn51:
1. Get a flash drive and copy the core Puppy files from the CD to the drive.

2. Boot off the CD with the flash drive plugged in.

3. At the short initial pause, type

Code: Select all

puppy pmedia=usbflash
May still need to use other boot options suggested.