Posted: Mon 27 May 2013, 12:26
I am now trying to use sleep/suspend mode. I made a pupshutdown & acpitool sfs. My laptop sleeps, but will not wakeup. Any suggestions will be appreciated. Thank you.
READ-ONLY Archive
https://oldforum.puppylinux.com/
Code: Select all
curl error: Problem with the SSL CA cert (path? access rights?)
just type packer in terminal, I patched it to update certificates if needed, later you can use yaourt or packer...pinguino wrote:hi, has anyone get this error when using yaourt?
curl error: Problem with the SSL CA cert (path? access rights?)
Sorry I can't understand this, is problem in image thumbnails that are not refreshing or in spacefm not displaying read only folder. For missing emblems in read-only folders, and other things that need fixing I made bug reports in spacefm page https://github.com/IgnorantGuru/spacefm/issuesyr1945 wrote:When I open my miscellaneous file... the icons have pictures of "locks". Why? Can I get rid of these and just have the regular icons? I don't like locked folders.
By the way, even with the pictures of locks, the files still open, but you cannot copy all of the contents of a particular folder to another folder. However, some of the contents do get put in the other folder?...
Click for larger image 1280x1024musher0 wrote:Hi. simargl.
Euh... the example in your picture is so small that I cannot see what your dynamic menu does. Sorry...
Every time you right click to start pekwm menu, this scans through list of applications and shows them without need to type fixmenus inside terminal like currently in Puppy JWM. Program is modified to compile with gtk3, I'm using gtk 3.9.0, that ensures it will not become obsolete any time soon.It will be interesting to know what functions you created dynamic menus for?
Entry = "Dynamic" { Actions = "Dynamic pekwm-menu /etc/xdg/menus/lxde-applications.menu" }
The argument that "everybody else is doing it, why don't you?" is the argument of the sheep, I mean the argument of "think less, follow more". In and of itself, it has no validity. By contrast, if you tell me that:simargl wrote:Hi musher0,
When you install lxpanel or xfce4-panel for example and click on start menu icon, exactly same thing happens like with this dynamic menu for pekwm, and that is how menu is generated in all other Linux distributions except in Puppy, whatever they target older or newer computers, doesn't matter. I don't find it is very CPU intensive, at least for me menu is instantly generated, but then I have just 32 desktop files under /usr/share/applications, in Puppy with 200 items might be slower. In my opinion it is useful when you install a program with pacman to have that application shown in the menu instantly, and not call some background script like fixmenus, that also don't forget is using equal or more CPU resources. Regarding menu categories, desktop menu specification exist with that purpose to stop everyone inventing their own rules, different just to be different, fragmenting and complicating things that should remain simple, example Games category renamed to Fun in Puppy Linux. If every other distribution follow desktop menu specification, why not Puppy?
Why not? This is not a joke, and I'll tell you why.simargl wrote: After all, desktop files for applications are made to follow standards, so what's next idea in Puppy - make new background script that edits all of desktop files for thousands of existing applications.
musher0 wrote: The argument that "everybody else is doing it, why don't you?" is the argument of the sheep, I mean the argument of "think less, follow more".
No comment. You missed the point. You answered like a politician or like a CEO.simargl wrote:musher0 wrote: The argument that "everybody else is doing it, why don't you?" is the argument of the sheep, I mean the argument of "think less, follow more".
Distrowatch has 300+ Linux distributions on their site. Leave aside fact that many of those simply are not real distributions, ALL of them are following menu specifications, so 99.7% of distributions are stupid sheep and follow standard and 0.3% (Puppy) are smart and break standard, and make something worse if I may add.
Filesystem should not be separate category because it lacks application variety, so you will make new category for just 10 or less file managers in Linux (spacefm, thunar, nautilus...), and what is use of category called Personal. Perfect example of let's make something different just to be different, and then application made for Puppy is listed in wrong category Other in all other distributions.