Firefox vs. Flash 9 Progress

How to do things, solutions, recipes, tutorials
Message
Author
User avatar
tazoc
Posts: 1157
Joined: Mon 11 Dec 2006, 08:07
Location: Lower Columbia Basin WA US
Contact:

Flash 9 version 9,0,48,0? Adobe test page

#61 Post by tazoc »

I found the Flash 9 test page today http://www.adobe.com/products/flash/about. Scrolling down the page I see an update for Linux to 9,0,48,0. I haven't tried it yet; am currently running 9,0,31,0.

Comparing versions among OS's it appears Linux's may be the newest. If the update works well maybe I'll have to revise my opinion of Adobe's Linux Support a bit :wink: But they still don't support Shockwave. :?
-TazOC
[url=http://www.lhpup.org/][b][size=100]lhpup.org[/size][/b] [img]http://www.lhpup.org/gallery/images/favicon.png[/img][/url] [url=http://www.lhpup.org/release-lhp.htm#602]Lighthouse 64 6.02[/url]

marquitico
Posts: 25
Joined: Tue 26 Jul 2005, 16:16
Location: New York, NY

Flash trouble (kinda) licked

#62 Post by marquitico »

Was starting from a completely clean Puppy 2.17. Flash kept breaking Firefox, and I was repeatedly wiping the Puppy file off my hard drive to start afresh until I noticed that there were no more crashes when Flash was the last thing installed.

I am running Firefox 2.0.0.6 with Flash 9.0.31.0. I used the Firefox 2.0.0.3 dotPUP and the Flash9 dotPUP.

After installing, Firefox quickly auto-updated to 2.0.0.5 and began breaking left and right, until I uninstalled the Flash9 dotPUP with the Puppy package manager, and immediately reinstalled it. No more crashes.

Just today Firefox auto-updated to 2.0.0.6, and the same trouble began immediately, which I solved with the same solution.

I don't do anything with the plugins (like changing/adding symlinks, or copying them all back and forth and such). I don't fuss with the Firefox startup script, and I don't change/create environmental variables, as has been described in the various fixes in this thread. I just uninstall and reinstall Flash over the Firefox updates, and poof! no more segmentation faults.

Don't understand it. Hope that this may be helpful to someone. Anyone else notice similar behavior?

User avatar
cb88
Posts: 1165
Joined: Mon 29 Jan 2007, 03:12
Location: USA
Contact:

#63 Post by cb88 »

yeah when firefox updated to 2.0.0.6 flash broke on windows xp so not even a linux issue it is a mutual flash and Firefox thing.

cb88

User avatar
never_stop_learning
Posts: 65
Joined: Fri 07 Jul 2006, 16:39

#64 Post by never_stop_learning »

I moved my question as the Flash 9 / Yahoo email issue seems to exist with both Firefox and Seamonkey.....

User avatar
ecomoney
Posts: 2178
Joined: Fri 25 Nov 2005, 07:00
Location: Lincolnshire, England
Contact:

Flock 1.0 Released

#65 Post by ecomoney »

I hear that flock version 1.0 has been released, and it includes a lot of changes to the base code that will hopefully mean that flash cannot crash it. Has anyone tried it as yet?
Puppy Linux's [url=http://www.murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?p=296352#296352]Mission[/url]

Sorry, my server is down atm!

User avatar
Lobster
Official Crustacean
Posts: 15522
Joined: Wed 04 May 2005, 06:06
Location: Paradox Realm
Contact:

#66 Post by Lobster »

I tried it :)
http://www.murga-linux.com/puppy/viewto ... 007&t=3094

I prefer Opera. In fact I prefer Dillo - well OK not Dillo.
:oops:
The early Flock was simple and elegant. The 1 release is too complex. If it is tweaked and customised (which you can do) It becomes more handable

A customised Flock in 3.03 has been suggested (above link) A lot of people are convinced that Firefox + add ons is the equivalent of Flock.

The installation seemed straightforward :)

Best try it and find out how you feel about it . . . 8)
Puppy Raspup 8.2Final 8)
Puppy Links Page http://www.smokey01.com/bruceb/puppy.html :D

User avatar
ecomoney
Posts: 2178
Joined: Fri 25 Nov 2005, 07:00
Location: Lincolnshire, England
Contact:

Flash 9

#67 Post by ecomoney »

Any news of the Flash/Stability problems? Flock does take some getting used to no doubt (and a lot of the useful plugins for firefox dont work). I was thinking of it for ecopup if it fixes the horrific stability problems that the users in my area have been experiencing with it.

For 3.03ce I think the spec of the computer needs to be kept roughly within current puppy limits (that means seamonkey or an opera version if someone wants to make one ;-)). Ecopup is for 700mhz/192mb upwards where stock puppy runs acceptably on 200mhz with 128mb RAM (in my experience).
Puppy Linux's [url=http://www.murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?p=296352#296352]Mission[/url]

Sorry, my server is down atm!

iscraigh
Posts: 276
Joined: Sun 03 Sep 2006, 05:50

#68 Post by iscraigh »

Been running flock on 3.0something seems stable with flash and java.

perixx
Posts: 92
Joined: Sun 21 Jan 2007, 09:34

#69 Post by perixx »

Dom Storage Objects - Supercookies / Flash Objects

Dom Storage Objects - what is it?
If you're using Firefox 2.x / Seamonkey 1.0.6x and want to control to prevent 'Supercookies' / Dom Storage Objects to be stored on your computer, enter
about:config
menu and set

Code: Select all

dom.storage.enabled
to 'false' !



Flash Objects - what is it?
Visit
and set your local/global flashplayer settings to prevent data storage of up to 100 kB per Flash-object to be stored on your HDD.


perixx[/code]

telemetric_au
Posts: 54
Joined: Wed 28 Feb 2007, 13:14

for those about to rock

#70 Post by telemetric_au »

ok , just to get this down while i have the folders open, not even 100% if it fixed anything, but it feels better ... ( have been crppled, unable to use firefox due to frequent random crashing / crash / crashes .

puppy beta rc whatever version deud on bike

firefox 3.0.1 pup
flash 10 beta pup
java 1.6 pup


original plugin files located /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins

contains 2 of key mentioned files: flashplayer.xpt , libflashplayer.so , third java one you can find yourself using puppy find tool: libjavaplugin_oji.so

changes made:

made sure there were relative symlinks (option available from rox drag and drop) to these three files in /usr/lib/firefox/plugins and ~/.mozilla/plugins

test here works fine: http://www.adobe.com/shockwave/welcome/ :)

telemetric_au
Posts: 54
Joined: Wed 28 Feb 2007, 13:14

#71 Post by telemetric_au »

just crashed on me again, so down graded to flash 7 ...

telemetric_au
Posts: 54
Joined: Wed 28 Feb 2007, 13:14

#72 Post by telemetric_au »

well it was better but still crashing(not as often) , so downgraded firefok to 2.0.0.16 which seem s to be going well... no crashes yet, knock thrice on wood.

User avatar
ttuuxxx
Posts: 11171
Joined: Sat 05 May 2007, 10:00
Location: Ontario Canada,Sydney Australia
Contact:

#73 Post by ttuuxxx »

telemetric_au wrote:well it was better but still crashing(not as often) , so downgraded firefok to 2.0.0.16 which seem s to be going well... no crashes yet, knock thrice on wood.
Which pet are you using? The Firefox+flash+java I made up months ago seemed to work well, It was based on The 2 series and updates
http://www.puppylinux.ca/tpp/ttuuxxx/pr ... irefox.pet

Or if you wanted Just Firefox & Flash this 2 series pet worked well also
http://www.puppylinux.ca/tpp/ttuuxxx/pr ... irefox.pet

ttuuxxx
http://audio.online-convert.com/ <-- excellent site
http://samples.mplayerhq.hu/A-codecs/ <-- Codec Test Files
http://html5games.com/ <-- excellent HTML5 games :)

telemetric_au
Posts: 54
Joined: Wed 28 Feb 2007, 13:14

#74 Post by telemetric_au »

i was just using pups i found individually lying around, its barely crashed on me since, but thanks for the suggestions , ill prob switch over some time. :)

Post Reply