I usually don't respond to this foolishness, but I am not going to let that little bit of revisionist history go by.rufwoof wrote: If you re-read what I originally posted it was a simple statement as to differences in zagreb999's and my definition of 'best'. For clarity I was not banned for trolling, but for actions taken due to raised blood pressure due to trolls (in a rage I widened out my signature to unreasonable width, but by the time I'd calmed I'd already been blocked from logging back in to undo that). Your own prior posts (and Fred's "btw" opting to agree with them) are a prime example of Trolling - as defined by creating discord on the Internet by starting quarrels or upsetting people by posting inflammatory remarks or insults.
Every once and a while, in addition to your silly security fetish, you decide to go off on a purity fetish on Debian Dog and Ubuntu Dog because they aren't Puppy Project or Puppy.
You did not vandalize the board "due to raised blood pressure due to trolls."
You vandalized the board after rcrsn51 posted a contribution in a Debian Dog Thread and you trolled him (purity fetish) by asking "Is that a puppy project" to which he replied "No, but no one else seems to mind. . . " or something to that effect.
Seriously, you should be apologizing to Fred and rcrsn51 and be thankful you have been allowed back, not acting all high and mighty.