Community Edition anyone interested?

News, happenings
Post Reply
Message
Author
gcmartin

What is a PM

#81 Post by gcmartin »

wanderer wrote:... sorry i don't really understand how to get in touch with smokey01.
I don't know what a pm is can you explain it to me
Hi @Wanderer

Look at the very top of this browser window. See what it says at the 4th line down under "Puppy Linux Discussion Forum"? Click it, in the middle.

Here to help

User avatar
smokey01
Posts: 2813
Joined: Sat 30 Dec 2006, 23:15
Location: South Australia :-(
Contact:

#82 Post by smokey01 »

Wanderer now has space on smokey01.com.

simargl5

#83 Post by simargl5 »

wanderer, Iguleder and Co.

Congrats for PUPPY CE (Community Edition) - Next one and only official Puppy

it has come from Debian stable, very nice

wanderer
Posts: 1098
Joined: Sat 20 Oct 2007, 23:17

#84 Post by wanderer »

hello everyone

i have further modified
our community puppy iso
by running the baby script in woof2
this has reduced the size of the iso
it is now 100 m

this is straight out of the woof2 machine
so it has the old logo on it
we will have to change that

i will name this iso ce1.iso
for community edition 1
and upload it to smokey01's site
this is our first iso
play with it
and post your thoughts

the only problem
is i don't know
how to upload it to smokey01's site
can anyone help ?

thanks to everyone for participating

wanderer

User avatar
puppyluvr
Posts: 3470
Joined: Sun 06 Jan 2008, 23:14
Location: Chickasha Oklahoma
Contact:

#85 Post by puppyluvr »

:D Hello,
Im coming in a bit late but willing to help.
And Id bet rusoodle would host at
meownplanet ala my repo link below.
All the CEs were good. I still have 109ce!
Close the Windows, and open your eyes, to a whole new world
I am Lead Dog of the
Puppy Linux Users Group on Facebook
Join us!

Puppy since 2.15CE...

User avatar
oldyeller
Posts: 889
Joined: Tue 15 Nov 2011, 14:26
Location: Alaska

#86 Post by oldyeller »

wanderer
the only problem
is i don't know
how to upload it to smokey01's site
can anyone help ?
You will have to pm smokey01 and he will give you the information that you need to upload it to his server. You should see if you have any pms in your inbox, I am sure that smokey01 sent you something about this.

Cheers

User avatar
smokey01
Posts: 2813
Joined: Sat 30 Dec 2006, 23:15
Location: South Australia :-(
Contact:

#87 Post by smokey01 »

wanderer check your private messages.

If you have a landline phone I can talk you through it. Put your number in a PM not in here if that's the way you would like to communicate.

wanderer
Posts: 1098
Joined: Sat 20 Oct 2007, 23:17

#88 Post by wanderer »

smokey01

i have read your pm
and will send you one back

i will also try to do as you instruct
if i have any further difficulty
i will contact you again by pm

thank you so much for your help
you provide a great service

wanderer

wanderer
Posts: 1098
Joined: Sat 20 Oct 2007, 23:17

#89 Post by wanderer »

hi all

it appears that i have succeeded in posting the ce1.iso
look for it at
http://www.smokey01.com/wanderer/

post if you have success or failure finding it

wanderer

User avatar
rg66
Posts: 1158
Joined: Mon 23 Jul 2012, 05:53
Location: Vancouver, BC Canada / Entebbe, Uganda Africa!?!

#90 Post by rg66 »

wanderer wrote:it appears that i have succeeded in posting the ce1.iso
What's the md5sum? Could you upload an md5sum.txt file to your folder?

And what about a name? DpupCE ?

Thanks
X-slacko-5b1 - X-tahr-2.0 - X-precise-2.4
[url=http://smokey01.com/rg66/]X-series repo[/url]

wanderer
Posts: 1098
Joined: Sat 20 Oct 2007, 23:17

#91 Post by wanderer »

i will look for the md5sum.txt file in woof
and try to post it

i will also try to download the iso file
burn it and see if it works

wanderer

User avatar
Billtoo
Posts: 3720
Joined: Tue 07 Apr 2009, 13:47
Location: Ontario Canada

#92 Post by Billtoo »

wanderer wrote:i will look for the md5sum.txt file in woof
and try to post it

i will also try to download the iso file
burn it and see if it works

wanderer
I get this for an md5sum:
5a3eb89b986548daf7c12e8ff7cdf0d1 ce1.iso

Is the devx going to be uploaded?

EDIT:
I burned the iso to a dvd but it wouldn't boot on two computers, kernel panic, failed to sync etc.
Last edited by Billtoo on Sun 10 Nov 2013, 07:55, edited 1 time in total.

wanderer
Posts: 1098
Joined: Sat 20 Oct 2007, 23:17

#93 Post by wanderer »

i will try to post the devx file now

wanderer

wanderer
Posts: 1098
Joined: Sat 20 Oct 2007, 23:17

#94 Post by wanderer »

i have posted the devx file

wanderer

wanderer
Posts: 1098
Joined: Sat 20 Oct 2007, 23:17

#95 Post by wanderer »

yes when i downloaded it
and tried to burn it
it wouldn't work

i'll check it
and try to upload it again

doing it now

wanderer

wanderer
Posts: 1098
Joined: Sat 20 Oct 2007, 23:17

#96 Post by wanderer »

the iso i have works fine on my computer
the iso i downloaded must have gotten corrupted
will try again

wanderer

User avatar
darkcity
Posts: 2534
Joined: Sun 23 May 2010, 19:16
Location: near here
Contact:

#97 Post by darkcity »


amigo
Posts: 2629
Joined: Mon 02 Apr 2007, 06:52

#98 Post by amigo »

"ce1.iso" I think you're still leaving too much information in that name. Why not just eliminate all numbers and call it 'ce.iso", or maybe even better, just name it "thing" and then nobody will be able to make anything of it.

Most software and distributions use a numbering scheme which indicates things about that version which go beyond simply indicating which is the 'latest' version. When you see a version '2.0' you can usually be sure that there was a version '1.0' before it, and that a version '3.0' would come after it. But, what does a version like '2.1' mean? It means that it follows '1.0' but is not a major revision.

Many projects even use a scheme like ??.??.?? where the first number is called the 'major' version number, the second is the 'minor' version and the third id the 'micro' version number. For distros, the major version number is usually only incremented when the new version has a newer toolchain or newewr versions of major core libraries -like glibc, libX11, gtk+2, etc. Minor version numbers are usually used to indicate the inclusion of bugfixes and/or security updates. So, if you have a version '1.0' and a bug or security hole is found, you fix those things and then release them in a version called '1.1'. This tells the user that the underlying system is the same as '1.0' bit includes some fixes or *security-related* version upgrades.

One can, hopefully, assume that there would be no 'regressions' from using the upgraded distro version. A 'regression' means that something that worked before now does not work.

When one names a thing, it is hoped that the name will indicate something about the thing -the more that name indicates the better.

User avatar
rg66
Posts: 1158
Joined: Mon 23 Jul 2012, 05:53
Location: Vancouver, BC Canada / Entebbe, Uganda Africa!?!

#99 Post by rg66 »

From Wikipedia:

"In principle, in subsequent releases, the major number is increased when there are significant jumps in functionality, the minor number is incremented when only minor features or significant fixes have been added, and the revision number is incremented when minor bugs are fixed."

Geoffrey and I have adopted this format, Carolina-1.0 is an official release, 1.1 is updates, 1.1.1 would be bug fixes. I suppose beta would be 0.1 or 1b, we used rc for release candidate.
X-slacko-5b1 - X-tahr-2.0 - X-precise-2.4
[url=http://smokey01.com/rg66/]X-series repo[/url]

wanderer
Posts: 1098
Joined: Sat 20 Oct 2007, 23:17

#100 Post by wanderer »

thanks
your last posts cheered me up
i'm a super minimalist
so i usually use just a letter and a number
for everything
but this is a group effort
so whatever the group decides is ok with me

my problem is i can't get the iso
uploaded and downloaded again
without it failing to boot
i dont know what is going on
so i'll just have to keep trying different things
until it works
it must get corrupted in the transfer
because the iso that i have works ok

wanderer

Post Reply