Gnetcat: a simple Puppy-to-Puppy file transfer program
Gnetcat: a simple Puppy-to-Puppy file transfer program
[Edit] This project has been removed due to lack of testing.
Last edited by rcrsn51 on Mon 16 May 2016, 10:16, edited 8 times in total.
Better than an USB pendrive ?
Better than an USB pendrive ?
Ok, Gnetcat tested. My computers are on the same table.
Ok, Gnetcat tested. My computers are on the same table.
Re: Better than an USB pendrive ?
Here is a test:Pelo wrote:Better than an USB pendrive ?
1. On machine A, put 10 Puppy ISO files in a folder.
2. Using a USB pendrive, transfer the folder to machine B.
3. Repeat using Gnetcat and Ethernet.
4. Compare times.
Hi rcrsn51, tried gnetcat-1.2 to transfer data between two computers both with puppy inside. Scenario:
First pc ASUS A555LB with T64_Light (Xanad's derivate from Tahrpup64 6.0.2).
Second pc Fujitsu Siemens AMILO A-7620 with Tahrpup 6.0.5 CE.
Turned off Firewall, assigned ip to the ethernet network cards, launched gnetcat on both computers, setted the various parameters and everything went well.
Some little questions:
Can I use the same ip of wlan0 card?
Is there a particular port number to choose or the default is fine?
Thanks for the great work on this Forum.
First pc ASUS A555LB with T64_Light (Xanad's derivate from Tahrpup64 6.0.2).
Second pc Fujitsu Siemens AMILO A-7620 with Tahrpup 6.0.5 CE.
Turned off Firewall, assigned ip to the ethernet network cards, launched gnetcat on both computers, setted the various parameters and everything went well.
Some little questions:
Can I use the same ip of wlan0 card?
Is there a particular port number to choose or the default is fine?
Thanks for the great work on this Forum.
[b]We are waves of the same sea, leaves of the same tree, flowers of the same garden.[/b]
Thank you for this test report.
Bill
Gnetcat should work equally well over WiFi but with one caveat. If the sender has both its eth0 and wlan0 interfaces up at the same time, Gnetcat may get confused about which to use. It would be safer to first run "ifconfig eth0 down". Then Gnetcat should correctly identify the active interface at both ends. Please test this, if possible.Can I use the same ip of wlan0 card?
Any port should work, as long as both parties agree. But you might want to avoid low-numbered ports which might already be in use. Please test.Is there a particular port number to choose or the default is fine?
Bill
Successfully tested the data transfer through the wifi network but it's not recommended with large files, too slow in comparison to Ethernet.rcrsn51 wrote:Gnetcat should work equally well over WiFi but with one caveat. If the sender has both its eth0 and wlan0 interfaces up at the same time, Gnetcat may get confused about which to use. It would be safer to first run "ifconfig eth0 down". Then Gnetcat should correctly identify the active interface at both ends. Please test this, if possible.
If both network cards have the same ip Gnetcat does not work:
Code: Select all
Receiving ...
nc: can't connect to remote host (192.168.1.120): No route to host
tar: This does not look like a tar archive
tar: Exiting with failure status due to previous errors
Done.
Press Enter:
Tested various port numbers, in my case all above 16384, with success.rcrsn51 wrote:Any port should work, as long as both parties agree. But you might want to avoid low-numbered ports which might already be in use. Please test.
Thanks again Bill.
[b]We are waves of the same sea, leaves of the same tree, flowers of the same garden.[/b]
Agreed. Using a flash drive and the "sneaker-net" would almost be faster.corvus wrote:Successfully tested the data transfer through the wifi network but it's not recommended with large files, too slow in comparison to Ethernet.
Which network cards to you mean - the sender and receiver's? How would they have the same IP address? It should be unique to each host on the network.If both network cards have the same ip Gnetcat does not work:
Sorry for my bad English, I mean the ethernet card and the wifi card on the same computer.rcrsn51 wrote:Which network cards to you mean - the sender and receiver's? How would they have the same IP address? It should be unique to each host on the network.
Regards.
[b]We are waves of the same sea, leaves of the same tree, flowers of the same garden.[/b]
I'm curious as to how that happened. In my experience, the router should be smart enough to give the two devices different IP addresses.corvus wrote:I mean the ethernet card and the wifi card on the same computer.
In any case, if you want to use Gnetcat over WiFi, you should take the eth0 interface down and make sure that the wlan0 interface is active. You can check by pinging its IP address from the receiving machine before starting Gnetcat.
The mistake is mine, for testing pourpose I have given the same wlan0 ip at ethernet card manually by typing in terminal:
but forgot to turn off the wifi interface.
Code: Select all
ifconfig eth0 add 192.168.1.120
[b]We are waves of the same sea, leaves of the same tree, flowers of the same garden.[/b]