Puppy Linux Discussion Forum

Ted Dog · Joined: 13 Sep 2005 Posts: 4013 Location: Heart of Texas

no rush for answers, my server farm is in deep storage and I have no place to set it up for a few weeks to months Crying or Very sad

need to move but no place ready, RV at ranch too small. Personal issues <lost tire = accident while driving not resolved fully> and many hospital trips and surgeries to worry over this month. Mad

slavvo67 · Joined: 12 Oct 2012 Posts: 1538 Location: The other Mr. 305

First post seems a bit too simplified:

sh-4.3# git clone https://github.com/puppylinux-woof-CE/woof-CE.git -b testing
Cloning into 'woof-CE'...
fatal: unable to access 'https://github.com/puppylinux-woof-CE/woof-CE.git/': Problem with the SSL CA cert (path? access rights?)

Iguleder · Posted: Sat 03 Oct 2015, 13:55 Post subject:

No, it's not! Something is wrong with your system's /etc/ssl.

slavvo67 · Joined: 12 Oct 2012 Posts: 1538 Location: The other Mr. 305

I'm running Barry's QU 6.2.1 Any suggestions? I just logged in and downloaded the .zip file using the browser, instead. It didn't take long. I'm up to the ./0setup stage and it seems to be working fine, this way.

Do you need to login to Github via terminal before the git instruction?

And you're right, the etc/ssl is empty in my QU.

musher0 · Posted: Sat 03 Oct 2015, 15:06 Post subject:

@Iguleder:

Thanks for the invitation, and your enthusiasm is communicative!

However, looking at your first line of code:
Any reason why you are directing users to use the "testing" branch
instead of the "master" branch?

I have no experience of woof-CE, but in Debian, the "testing" branch is
recommended for very advanced users only, because users with average
knowledge of Linux may be stumped by the bugs that remain in the
"testing" branch.

Wouldn't the "master" branch of woof-CE produce a more stable Puppy?
Referring to my previous post, wouldn't the "master" branch require
less power of abstraction on the part of users, I mean: be easier to
understand and conceptualize?

I'm not "questioning" anything here, I'm just putting a toe in the river
before my first swimming lesson, so to speak.

BFN.

musher0

musher0 · Posted: Sat 03 Oct 2015, 15:09 Post subject:

slavvo67 · Joined: 12 Oct 2012 Posts: 1538 Location: The other Mr. 305

Hi Musher0:

My guess is because Puppy needs testers!!!

Best,

Slavvo67

musher0 · Posted: Sat 03 Oct 2015, 15:32 Post subject:

Hi, slavvo67.

Me thinks (with all due respect) that Iguleder is shooting himself in the foot:
if all Puppyists start "woof-ing" their Puppies, we won't need him anymore
and he'll be out of a "job"! Twisted Evil

@Iguleder
I know: bad joke! But you realize that all Puppyists do not have your talent
and your level of expertise, don't you?

BFN.

musher0

Iguleder · Posted: Sat 03 Oct 2015, 15:49 Post subject:

Ted Dog · Joined: 13 Sep 2005 Posts: 4013 Location: Heart of Texas

Wouldn't fatdog64 work? Or is there any current slaco64s?

James C · Joined: 26 Mar 2009 Posts: 6725 Location: Kentucky

musher0 · Posted: Sat 03 Oct 2015, 16:41 Post subject:

I suppose I'm out of luck?...

Ted Dog · Joined: 13 Sep 2005 Posts: 4013 Location: Heart of Texas

LFS and that is the only build system I have been successful with, did get really far with puppy-T2 for PPC decade or so ago, got blocked at xwindows part and a few less important places. WolfQ has a long thread of tears, and trials, and hoping some besides BK can figure it out before I try it.
So what is be latest STABLE anything that would serve as a build system base, since my current stable FD64 is not usable.
I am willing to give it a honest multiweek try. Smile

hope someone in the know can Xplain the points that look obvious to everyone but a newB Idea

musher0 · Posted: Sat 03 Oct 2015, 16:47 Post subject:

Fine, jessie can be created from "devuan" repos, whatever that is...

But now, what does this mean?

Iguleder · Posted: Sat 03 Oct 2015, 16:48 Post subject: