Puppy Linux Discussion Forum Forum Index Puppy Linux Discussion Forum
Puppy HOME page : puppylinux.com
"THE" alternative forum : puppylinux.info
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

The time now is Tue 17 Oct 2017, 09:26
All times are UTC - 4
 Forum index » Taking the Puppy out for a walk » Announcements
New xenialpup 7.0.6
Moderators: Flash, Ian, JohnMurga
Post new topic   Reply to topic View previous topic :: View next topic
Page 1 of 2 [24 Posts]   Goto page: 1, 2 Next
Author Message
Wildman69


Joined: 26 Mar 2017
Posts: 35

PostPosted: Sun 26 Mar 2017, 09:37    Post subject:  New xenialpup 7.0.6
Subject description: My first build
 

Greetings One and All,
Yesterday I made my first Puppy with woof-CE.
It came out as:
xenial-7.0.6 with kernel 4.9.13 no PAE x_86

If you would like to test and let me know how it is for you, the links are:

iso link:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B5lAgaz0OwHiSFRkWEZnTjE4ekk/view?usp=sharing

iso checksum link:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B5lAgaz0OwHic2lOZnhWcFJhRnc/view?usp=sharing

devx file link:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B5lAgaz0OwHicENYOWFwVGhUOUU/view?usp=sharing

devx file checksum link:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B5lAgaz0OwHiRFFEX2JxNEgyODg/view?usp=sharing

Thank You and HAND.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message 
escucha


Joined: 14 Mar 2009
Posts: 57
Location: In the Euro Zone next the Mediterranean Sea

PostPosted: Mon 27 Mar 2017, 13:23    Post subject:  

.
No 64 bit version?

32 bit working quite vell. Writing from it now, some little troubles on tray and menu when I made changes with JWM Desk Manager but...

I already probing on a xenialpup64 7.0.8 version test with 4.10 kernel into
How can this be ¿?
is yours a setback fork?.

Thanks for the efforts.

_________________
Definitely moving to linux 64bit. A great step for me.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message 
davids45


Joined: 26 Nov 2006
Posts: 987
Location: Chatswood, NSW

PostPosted: Mon 27 Mar 2017, 19:00    Post subject: Frugal fine for now
Subject description: Full in future
 

G'day Wildman69,

Made a Frugal Pup of your iso and it is running well - logged on with it now, via Firefox running from a symlink to my data partition.

Nothing wrong so far.

I have loaded several sfs and these are running as expected (screenshot).

I don't know if you are co-ordinating with other Xenial-pup-makers but, just in case, I think it may help if you gave your Pups a more personalised or distinguishing name - so I for one, don't get confused between all the different Pup Xenials Shocked .

I'll do a Full install in the near future to further check this Pup.

Thanks for sharing your work.

David S.
xenial706frugal.jpg
 Description   xenial706 - frugal - initial set-up with my usual package additions
 Filesize   89.03 KB
 Viewed   811 Time(s)

xenial706frugal.jpg

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message 
ally


Joined: 19 May 2012
Posts: 1516
Location: lincoln, uk

PostPosted: Mon 27 Mar 2017, 20:49    Post subject:  

mirrored here: http://archive.org/details/Puppy_Linux_xenialpup

Smile
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website 
Reneetje


Joined: 22 Apr 2013
Posts: 7
Location: The Netherlands, Fryslan - Foar de kofje net eamelje

PostPosted: Tue 28 Mar 2017, 06:12    Post subject:  Why so many  

Why so many xenialpups ????? Does this add something ?
Is xenial-7.0.6 with kernel 4.9.13 no PAE x_86 SAFE to use ?
Is this ISO trusted or approved by the official headgroup?

With kind regards,
Rene
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website 
watchdog

Joined: 28 Sep 2012
Posts: 1450
Location: Italy

PostPosted: Tue 28 Mar 2017, 07:11    Post subject:  

I think this xenialpup should be posted in Derivatives section of the forum and was posted here with a little error of evaluation. We must thank wildman69 for the contribute. Puppy is an open source project and every kind and appropriate contribute should be generally accepted, I was said: if you discover any flaw in this derivative then you can post here and reclaim clarifications.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message 
Reneetje


Joined: 22 Apr 2013
Posts: 7
Location: The Netherlands, Fryslan - Foar de kofje net eamelje

PostPosted: Tue 28 Mar 2017, 08:05    Post subject:  

Watchdog, I disagree with you

Without supervision and control you murder Puppy Linux.

So, I have to tell newbies that we can divide Puppy Linux into 2 groups:

- Group 1 is trusted and approved (ISO is official)
- Group 2 is a testgroup (download ISO at our own risk. This can harm your computer, and be awared, maybe the FSB is watching you)

This will not promote Puppy Linux.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website 
watchdog

Joined: 28 Sep 2012
Posts: 1450
Location: Italy

PostPosted: Tue 28 Mar 2017, 08:28    Post subject:  

Reneetje wrote:

- Group 1 is trusted and approved (ISO is official)
- Group 2 is a testgroup (download ISO at our own risk.
This will not promote Puppy Linux.


It's already so as you are saying: group1 is official puppy and the official developers are encorauging skilled puppy followers to contribute to woof-ce with autonomous builds. There is also the thread "Woof-ce needs you" by Iguleder (puppy's developer). In group2 and Derivatives' section not-official contributes are welcomed: why do you not trust this xenialpup and trust all the stuff posted in Derivatives' section by unknown puppy followers? Is there any reason I don't know?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message 
Wildman69


Joined: 26 Mar 2017
Posts: 35

PostPosted: Tue 28 Mar 2017, 09:29    Post subject:  Replies to all of the above.
Subject description: Thank You for your comments
 

Thank each and every one for your help.
#1) escucha : I too had trouble with file manager after changes to desktop theme. I now have to go through the home folder to get anywhere.
As for the 64 bit version; woof-CE is not giving me an iso in the output. I built this with the woof-CE from Github. Your Welcome.
#2) davids45 : Thank You. I am new here. The purpose of this build was to update the OS. As I said I used woof-CE from github.
#3) ally : Thanks for the mirror.
#4) Reneetje and watchdog :
As stated I used woof-CE from Github to build the thing.
So I think it is as safe as the others it being built the same way.
My Word of Truth: I did not add anything to damage or compromise anyone.
I did the thing: I consider it a personal accomplishment considering that the instructions in woof-CE are flawed.
I only wanted to share my success.
An I did mention "test" in the original post.

Again thank you all for your time.
HAND
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message 
bigpup


Joined: 11 Oct 2009
Posts: 9372
Location: Charleston S.C. USA

PostPosted: Tue 28 Mar 2017, 18:24    Post subject:  

If you made this from scratch using Woof-CE.

This is your specific compile of a Puppy.

You need to give it your name and not use a Puppy version name that is already in use.

Xenialpup is already a named Puppy version.

You can call it anything you want to, but do not use a name that is already an accepted Puppy version!!!!!!

Give some respect to the person who spent a lot of time giving us Xenialpup. Exclamation

Give us your specific Puppy version name, so we can give you the respect you deserve!!!!!

_________________
I have found, in trying to help people, that the things they do not tell you, are usually the clue to solving the problem.
When I was a kid I wanted to be older.... This is not what I expected Shocked
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message 
bigpup


Joined: 11 Oct 2009
Posts: 9372
Location: Charleston S.C. USA

PostPosted: Tue 28 Mar 2017, 18:32    Post subject:  

I suggest newer Puppies need to have PAE.

More people now use computers with more than 4GB of memory.

If you do not know it, this is probably going to be a good Puppy for mew computers.

_________________
I have found, in trying to help people, that the things they do not tell you, are usually the clue to solving the problem.
When I was a kid I wanted to be older.... This is not what I expected Shocked
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message 
Sage

Joined: 04 Oct 2005
Posts: 5282
Location: GB

PostPosted: Wed 29 Mar 2017, 01:56    Post subject:  

Quote:
More people now use computers with more than 4GB of memory.

Wrong! Having lived and worked as a member of your nation, I do realise how difficult it is for native-born Americans to appreciate what is happening elsewhere in RoW! Of course, your contention may be partly correct for folks visiting this Forum, but statistics suggest that ~95% of PC users still have W-XP, even W98, on their machines, mostly with <1Gb mem and some even using 386 & 486 cpu. Surely these are the target audience for Enlightenment...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message 
nic007


Joined: 13 Nov 2011
Posts: 2179
Location: Cradle of Humankind

PostPosted: Wed 29 Mar 2017, 02:27    Post subject:  

Sage wrote:
Quote:
More people now use computers with more than 4GB of memory.

Wrong! Having lived and worked as a member of your nation, I do realise how difficult it is for native-born Americans to appreciate what is happening elsewhere in RoW! Of course, your contention may be partly correct for folks visiting this Forum, but statistics suggest that ~95% of PC users still have W-XP, even W98, on their machines, mostly with <1Gb mem and some even using 386 & 486 cpu. Surely these are the target audience for Enlightenment...


Your stats in terms of which versions of Windows people use are definitely wrong. Windows 7 is by far the most used version now although XP still has a relatively solid base, 98 hardly shows up. In tems of 386 and 486 cpu's - surely you must be joking. What can you run on a 386/486 (98 at a stretch)?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message 
Sage

Joined: 04 Oct 2005
Posts: 5282
Location: GB

PostPosted: Wed 29 Mar 2017, 02:35    Post subject:  

Quote:
Cradle of Humankind
Yes, very funny, but consider the real world, not just where readers of this Forum reside or collectors of spoof statistics (aka fake news) hang out!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message 
Keef


Joined: 20 Dec 2007
Posts: 864
Location: Staffordshire

PostPosted: Wed 29 Mar 2017, 04:06    Post subject:  

Quote:
Cradle of Humankind


...sounds more like a Yorkshireman to me.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message 
Display posts from previous:   Sort by:   
Page 1 of 2 [24 Posts]   Goto page: 1, 2 Next
Post new topic   Reply to topic View previous topic :: View next topic
 Forum index » Taking the Puppy out for a walk » Announcements
Jump to:  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
[ Time: 0.0528s ][ Queries: 14 (0.0045s) ][ GZIP on ]