slacko-700 rc3

A home for all kinds of Puppy related projects
Message
Author
gyro
Posts: 1798
Joined: Tue 28 Oct 2008, 21:35
Location: Brisbane, Australia

#541 Post by gyro »

FYI,

My desktop looked more "normal", when I used a fresh savefolder for this new version, rather than the savefolder from the previous version .

gyro

cretsiah
Posts: 108
Joined: Sat 24 May 2008, 15:28

Slacko 6.3.2 Dpup Stretch conflict

#542 Post by cretsiah »

wasnt sure whether to post issue here or just point you to my thread

so decided to add link

http://murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?t=118922

it covers some issues incounted and a potential fix (at least for DPup).

issues such as

vmalloc, kthread, nosemaphore

and to get DPup stretch working screws up Slacko 6.3.2 (after having no issues with Slacko 6.3.2

a sort of frugal install

files in folder are:

- help folder
- vesamenu.c32
- vmlinuz
- initrd.gz
- puppy_slacko_6.3.2.sfs
- zdrv_slacko_6.3.2.sfs

incase its important Grub from 2.14R or 2.14X was used in MBR mode on EXT3

yr1945
Posts: 212
Joined: Sat 17 Apr 2010, 18:38

Slacko 700 rc3

#543 Post by yr1945 »

Just playing around with an old OS. I noticed you have no options when in preferences-advanced-data choices..... usually you can check boxes to prevent firefox from collecting data. Not so on this OS. Does anyone know why? Anyways, my guess is that firefox does collects data even when you tell them not to collect your data? Any thoughts? Thank you.

User avatar
bigpup
Posts: 13886
Joined: Sun 11 Oct 2009, 18:15
Location: S.C. USA

#544 Post by bigpup »

What specific version of Firefox?

If you are talking about the Firefox ESR version.
Being an ESR version.
They already have all the info they need.
ESR versions are suppose to be well tested and stable.
Plus most people using ESR versions are businesses and major companies.
Firefox Extended Support Release (ESR) is an official version of Firefox developed for large organizations like universities and businesses that need to set up and maintain Firefox on a large scale. Firefox ESR does not come with the latest features but it has the latest security and stability fixes
The things they do not tell you, are usually the clue to solving the problem.
When I was a kid I wanted to be older.... This is not what I expected :shock:
YaPI(any iso installer)

yr1945
Posts: 212
Joined: Sat 17 Apr 2010, 18:38

#545 Post by yr1945 »

Thank you for responding... it is ESR 52.1.2

foxpup
Posts: 1132
Joined: Fri 29 Jul 2016, 21:08

#546 Post by foxpup »

Sailor Enceladus wrote:It looks like 01micko added some changes/fixes recently to slacko 14.2 in woof-CE so I tried a new slacko64 build.

http://www.mediafire.com/folder/04k8b8812ccoh/x86_64
Hi Sailor

I am using slacko64-6.9.9.10_r8085.It works really well.
I monitor it with htop and it is very gentle on the limited resources of this 12 year old laptop.
Thank you Sailor. Thank you 01micko.

In your mediafire map is devx_slacko_6.9.9.9.sfs
It is 10 days older than the iso.
Is it the right devx for 6.9.9.10?

foxpup
Posts: 1132
Joined: Fri 29 Jul 2016, 21:08

new2dir installs immediately

#547 Post by foxpup »

I have been compiling.
I have found that new2dir creates the directory to make a .pet,
but it installs on the system as well.
That is not nice. PPM does not know about it.
.

gyro
Posts: 1798
Joined: Tue 28 Oct 2008, 21:35
Location: Brisbane, Australia

Re: new2dir installs immediately

#548 Post by gyro »

foxpup wrote:I have been compiling.
I have found that new2dir creates the directory to make a .pet,
but it installs on the system as well.
That is not nice. PPM does not know about it.
.
Yes, 'new2dir' has always done that.

You can take a backup of your savefolder before running 'new2dir'.
Then after running 'dir2pet', make sure the ".pet" is not in the savefolder and restore the savefolder to pre-new2dir.

The idea is to be in a situation where you can discard the savefolder that is in place at the time of running 'new2dir'.

gyro

foxpup
Posts: 1132
Joined: Fri 29 Jul 2016, 21:08

Re: new2dir installs immediately

#549 Post by foxpup »

gyro wrote:Yes, 'new2dir' has always done that.
Sure about that? There are no versions that do not install?
Anyway, I now compile starting up without savefile.
If all went well, I install with the .pet in my startup with with savefile.

User avatar
OscarTalks
Posts: 2196
Joined: Mon 06 Feb 2012, 00:58
Location: London, England

#550 Post by OscarTalks »

Hi foxpup,

In my experience, running new2dir make install will always do 2 things, create the new dir (from which you can make the .pet) and also install into system. This is because you are running make install. Not sure if it is possible to run new2dir on its own as I have never tried.

Normally I compile in a clean, fresh pfix=ram boot as you are now doing, since other installed libs can change what gets linked against. Packages for distribution should be compatible with the original .iso although occasionally I will create a savefile of a modified build environment and retain it for building future versions of some specific package.

One thing you can do if you want to retain the new dir, but remove all the installed files of that package from system is run make uninstall in the source directory.
Oscar in England
Image

foxpup
Posts: 1132
Joined: Fri 29 Jul 2016, 21:08

#551 Post by foxpup »

Thank you for the good advice, dear pupplers (what is the word? like slackers).

Here are the .pets I've compiled in slacko64 r8085 from Sailor Enceladus
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/ ... sp=sharing

.dillo
- fltk
.icewm
(start icewm2 preferably)
.xfe 'suite'
- fox toolkit

This Slacko is very nice, I highly recommend it.

Post Reply