re: Min browser

Browsers, email, chat, etc.
Message
Author
orrin
Posts: 140
Joined: Tue 06 Sep 2016, 01:09
Location: sparks, NV
Contact:

#46 Post by orrin »

Min will not run in my Slacko 64-6.3.2
Last edited by orrin on Thu 25 Oct 2018, 17:27, edited 1 time in total.
[color=#FF0000]Engineer/Photographer/Webmaster[/color]
[img]https://i.postimg.cc/fL9MypfV/sig-image.png[/img]

User avatar
mikeb
Posts: 11297
Joined: Thu 23 Nov 2006, 13:56

#47 Post by mikeb »

Sounds like it wants an older or newer gtk.
The build from the min website wants newer gtk than one of the builds on here.

Suggestion...try a different build of min

I got it to run on lucid but that did require a gtk update.
... gtk 2400 ... but the min website build wanted newer than that.

mike

User avatar
peebee
Posts: 4370
Joined: Sun 21 Sep 2008, 12:31
Location: Worcestershire, UK
Contact:

#48 Post by peebee »

The latest version needs GTK+3.....
ImageLxPup = Puppy + LXDE
Main version used daily: LxPupSc; Assembler of UPups, ScPup & ScPup64, LxPup, LxPupSc & LxPupSc64

orrin
Posts: 140
Joined: Tue 06 Sep 2016, 01:09
Location: sparks, NV
Contact:

#49 Post by orrin »

peebee wrote:The latest version needs GTK+3.....
I have GTK+3-3.8.2 installed!
This is the same error I get with any chrome-based browser later than
version 59
[color=#FF0000]Engineer/Photographer/Webmaster[/color]
[img]https://i.postimg.cc/fL9MypfV/sig-image.png[/img]

User avatar
mikeb
Posts: 11297
Joined: Thu 23 Nov 2006, 13:56

#50 Post by mikeb »

The sfs I got from this thread of 1.7 was compiled to use gtk 2 so I assume its a build option though I used the 32 bit version I see no reason the 64 bit could not after all it will have exactly the same interface function calls.

mike

orrin
Posts: 140
Joined: Tue 06 Sep 2016, 01:09
Location: sparks, NV
Contact:

#51 Post by orrin »

I got GTK+3-3.8.2 from the Puppy package manager. I assumed the package manager would properly install it.

Is there some action I must take to turn it on?
[color=#FF0000]Engineer/Photographer/Webmaster[/color]
[img]https://i.postimg.cc/fL9MypfV/sig-image.png[/img]

User avatar
Mike Walsh
Posts: 6351
Joined: Sat 28 Jun 2014, 12:42
Location: King's Lynn, UK.

#52 Post by Mike Walsh »

@ orrin:-

Just out of curiosity, where does pFind show your gtk-3.0 to be installed? Is it in /usr/lib64, or /usr/lib? For Slacko 64 6.3.2, it should in be /usr/lib64; the Slackos don't use the sym-link to /usr/lib that the 'buntu-based Pups have.

I have a feeling you'll also need gdk-3.0, as well..... Y'know, just out of curiosity, have you tried any of my current Chrome packages recently? All the libs & stuff required by Chrome are within a sub-directory inside /chrome; all self-contained nowadays.....


Mike. :wink:

User avatar
norgo
Posts: 388
Joined: Fri 13 Nov 2015, 17:19
Location: Germany
Contact:

#53 Post by norgo »

I downloaded version 1.8.0 for testing
has somebody noticed that the min-1.8.0-amd64 package is using the /usr/lib path instead the /usr/lib64 ?

User avatar
mikeb
Posts: 11297
Joined: Thu 23 Nov 2006, 13:56

#54 Post by mikeb »

Perhaps we need a volunteer to make a consistent puppy friendly build.

I never did find out who built the sfs that I run on Lucid.

mike

orrin
Posts: 140
Joined: Tue 06 Sep 2016, 01:09
Location: sparks, NV
Contact:

#55 Post by orrin »

Mike Walsh wrote:@ orrin:-
Y'know, just out of curiosity, have you tried any of my current Chrome packages recently? All the libs & stuff required by Chrome are within a sub-directory inside /chrome; all self-contained nowadays.....
Mike. :wink:
I prefer not to use Chrome! I do not like Google watching everything I do.
I really like Slimjet... are you going to make an SFS of that with all the
contained libs? I'm running the Slimjet based on Chrome 59.
[color=#FF0000]Engineer/Photographer/Webmaster[/color]
[img]https://i.postimg.cc/fL9MypfV/sig-image.png[/img]

User avatar
jplt_bis
Posts: 69
Joined: Mon 20 Feb 2017, 19:06
Location: Planete Terre

#56 Post by jplt_bis »

I'am wrting this message from the deb min from their github on uppupcc 18.10 :

: https://github.com/minbrowser/min/relea ... 1_i386.deb

Work great.

User avatar
greengeek
Posts: 5789
Joined: Tue 20 Jul 2010, 09:34
Location: Republic of Novo Zelande

#57 Post by greengeek »

When I use Chrome and view a Murga forum post I can right click on the icon at the top of a post and save the link (to identify the exact specific post).

However when I do this in Min it only gives me the address of the icon - not the unique address of the post.

Any suggestions how I can identify the unique url of a specific post using Min?
Attachments
Link_icon.jpg
(18.65 KiB) Downloaded 360 times

User avatar
8Geee
Posts: 2181
Joined: Mon 12 May 2008, 11:29
Location: N.E. USA

#58 Post by 8Geee »

g/g

Not a Min user but your problem looks like

a.) The browser cannot/doesnot use a 'gif' as a link
b.) Following that, can it link using jpg or png?, text-link only?

May be a setting in the browser to adjust this.

Regards
8Geee
Linux user #498913 "Some people need to reimagine their thinking."
"Zuckerberg: a large city inhabited by mentally challenged people."

User avatar
greengeek
Posts: 5789
Joined: Tue 20 Jul 2010, 09:34
Location: Republic of Novo Zelande

#59 Post by greengeek »

The strange thing is - it can link from the gif ok (clicking it takes me to a specific post). Min obviously knows what the link is pointing too, but just won't tell me what that is when I rightclick it.

Just an oversight i guess.

Another related question though: where does Min display the url of the page you are currently viewing? Sometimes I want to be able to copy that url and view it in another browser or save it to a document - but how?

User avatar
peebee
Posts: 4370
Joined: Sun 21 Sep 2008, 12:31
Location: Worcestershire, UK
Contact:

#60 Post by peebee »

Looks like min has become 64-bit only on Linux from version 1.10.0

1.9.2 is last i386 version

https://electronjs.org/blog/linux-32bit-support
ImageLxPup = Puppy + LXDE
Main version used daily: LxPupSc; Assembler of UPups, ScPup & ScPup64, LxPup, LxPupSc & LxPupSc64

Post Reply