IoT

For discussions about security.
Post Reply
Message
Author
labbe5
Posts: 2159
Joined: Wed 13 Nov 2013, 14:26
Location: Canada

IoT

#1 Post by labbe5 »

https://dzone.com/articles/why-legislat ... d:%20dzone

We’re currently in an era where a household may contain over 200 connected devices, each with their own specific security requirements and varied life cycle. Even just cataloging all the connected devices in a single workplace could be a mammoth undertaking. Personally, I’m unconvinced a security minimum standards or rating system would work either, due to the sheer volume of connected devices emerging each year and the volatility of cyber security to new vulnerabilities.
Last edited by labbe5 on Thu 10 Jan 2019, 16:05, edited 1 time in total.

labbe5
Posts: 2159
Joined: Wed 13 Nov 2013, 14:26
Location: Canada

The Root Cause of IoT Skepticism

#2 Post by labbe5 »

https://dzone.com/articles/the-root-cau ... skepticism

It's healthy to be skeptical of new ideas, but let's take a look at the philosophy that might be holding back the biggest advancement in technology in a century.

User avatar
8Geee
Posts: 2181
Joined: Mon 12 May 2008, 11:29
Location: N.E. USA

#3 Post by 8Geee »

Lets not...

When IoT comes with TLS1.2 forward secrecy, or TLS1.3
it will be secure, otherwise NOT SECURE.

No philosophy needed, no manipulation needed.
Linux user #498913 "Some people need to reimagine their thinking."
"Zuckerberg: a large city inhabited by mentally challenged people."

Post Reply