I am not saying ext4 is no good to use.
Just I use ext 3 for Puppies, because some of the Puppy programs were written before full ext 4 support was in Puppy.
These programs just handle ext 3 better.
Keep in mind.
Code in Puppy only updates when someone volunteers to work on it.
Example:
With Fatdog64 720 and using Grub4dos boot loader.
It boots faster on a ext 3 format install than an ext 4 format.
Something to do with how Grub4dos searches for stuff on a ext 4 format and how Fatdog is configured.
http://www.murga-linux.com/puppy/viewto ... 343#976343
Intel Pro Wireless 2200 not working [partly solved]
-
- Posts: 1543
- Joined: Mon 22 Feb 2016, 19:43
This happened to me when I tried to make a puppy with Slackware 13.37:Spielmops wrote:Where did you read this?Just I use ext 3 for Puppies, because some of the Puppy programs were written before full ext 4 support was in Puppy. These programs just handle ext 3 better.
http://www.murga-linux.com/puppy/viewto ... 823#919823
Maybe the original Slacko 5.3.3 works better and I forgot to do something or messed something up at the time though.it doesn't let me mount ext4 and thinks it's ext3
This info is from working on and with Puppy for years.Spielmops wrote:Where did you read this?Just I use ext 3 for Puppies, because some of the Puppy programs were written before full ext 4 support was in Puppy. These programs just handle ext 3 better.
I am not totally convinced that ext 4 is totally bug free.
Ext 4 bug report.
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/buglist.cgi ... e%20System
Bug report for ext 3
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/buglist.cgi ... e%20System
Ext 3 - 7 bugs.
Ext4 - 74 bugs.
The newest Puppies should be updated to handle ext 4, but Puppy program code updates only really get tested by we the users using them.
Puppy does not have one of these testing departments.
- Attachments
-
- Puppy test lab.jpg
- (109.15 KiB) Downloaded 371 times
The things they do not tell you, are usually the clue to solving the problem.
When I was a kid I wanted to be older.... This is not what I expected
YaPI(any iso installer)
When I was a kid I wanted to be older.... This is not what I expected
YaPI(any iso installer)
This is Puppy.
Puppy is not a normal Linux OPS.
A lot of stuff is done the Puppy way.
So, by your reasoning.
The more you use a format the buggier it will be
Could it be that ext3 has been around, long enough, for most all of the bugs have been fixed.
Nothing new to find!!
Puppy is not a normal Linux OPS.
A lot of stuff is done the Puppy way.
So, by your reasoning.
The more you use a format the buggier it will be
Could it be that ext3 has been around, long enough, for most all of the bugs have been fixed.
Nothing new to find!!
Limitations
In 2008, the principal developer of the ext3 and ext4 file systems, Theodore Ts'o, stated that although ext4 has improved features, it is not a major advance, it uses old technology, and is a stop-gap.
The things they do not tell you, are usually the clue to solving the problem.
When I was a kid I wanted to be older.... This is not what I expected
YaPI(any iso installer)
When I was a kid I wanted to be older.... This is not what I expected
YaPI(any iso installer)
In 2008, the principal developer of the ... stop-gap.
This was 10 years ago.
Do what you want, but in my experience ext4 is more stable and - in case of a crash - much faster.
Anyway, back to the problem:
Ich got another wifi-card: ATHEROS AR5006XS G+ 108 Mbit/s MINI PCI WLAN-Karte. Works out of the box.
RemarK: Intel-Laptops do not work with Intel-Wifi-cards ...
Spielmops
This was 10 years ago.
Do what you want, but in my experience ext4 is more stable and - in case of a crash - much faster.
Anyway, back to the problem:
Ich got another wifi-card: ATHEROS AR5006XS G+ 108 Mbit/s MINI PCI WLAN-Karte. Works out of the box.
RemarK: Intel-Laptops do not work with Intel-Wifi-cards ...
Spielmops