| Author |
Message |
Bancobusto

Joined: 13 Jun 2005 Posts: 168 Location: Vancouver Island
|
Posted: Wed 27 Jul 2005, 12:24 Post subject:
Virtual Terminal Bug? (Ctrl+Alt+F1) |
|
I was in the proceess of learning what all this business of virtual terminals was all about, and trying things out along the way. It seems as though pushing Ctrl +Alt + F1 will get me to a pupppc prompt, so I continued cycling through the keys, but couldn't end up getting back to the GUI.
I tried pushing Ctrl + Alt + all of the F keys individually, to no avail.
Am I missing something? Or is this a bug. I don't know, because that's just the state I'm in. But I figured I'd share this with you all anyhow.
Cheers
_________________ Freedom isn't just a Puppy-Linux forum member!
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Guest
Guest
|
Posted: Wed 27 Jul 2005, 21:08 Post subject:
|
|
There is only two virtual terminals in puppy, have a look at /etc/initttab
This is based on 1.0.3
Puppy boots to VT1 which is 'eaten' when starting the Xsession therefore leaving VT2 as your next console, VT3 (ctrl-alt-f3) is the vterm for the Xsession
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Bancobusto

Joined: 13 Jun 2005 Posts: 168 Location: Vancouver Island
|
Posted: Wed 27 Jul 2005, 21:36 Post subject:
|
|
Thanks for the info
Is there a way then of switching back to the X environment? If I press Alt + Ctrl F2, I get taken to a promt, but I can't seem to get taken back to XWindows, no matter what I do! Alt + Ctrl + F3 doesn't bring me back - does it for you?
Just curious- I'm glad that puppy doesn't have a whole ton running at once, as that was where I was going in my mind, trying to turn some off....
Please help, am just rather curious.
Cheers, bladehunter, and if I may say so, you've done a hell of a lot for Puppy, and I always appreciate your posts, you're doing a great job!
_________________ Freedom isn't just a Puppy-Linux forum member!
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Lobster
Official Crustacean

Joined: 04 May 2005 Posts: 15109 Location: Paradox Realm
|
Posted: Wed 27 Jul 2005, 22:39 Post subject:
|
|
type
xwin
or better still
xstart
_________________ Puppy WIKI
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Bancobusto

Joined: 13 Jun 2005 Posts: 168 Location: Vancouver Island
|
Posted: Wed 27 Jul 2005, 22:57 Post subject:
|
|
Thanks, but by doing so won't I start up an entirely new Xsession?
Can't I get back to my original session, if I'm simply "visiting" the other terminal?
Guess I just don't understand, really....
Thanks all, for your help.
_________________ Freedom isn't just a Puppy-Linux forum member!
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Lobster
Official Crustacean

Joined: 04 May 2005 Posts: 15109 Location: Paradox Realm
|
Posted: Wed 27 Jul 2005, 23:23 Post subject:
|
|
OK I understand the question now . . .
rxvt is a terminal which runs inside Puppy
but when you go to the full screen terminal
you close down the X-windows system
The reason is perhaps similar to unmounting a device
you are making a clean break with that device
That means it is less likely to be hijacked by [insert the usual culprits]
In the olde days of Linux everything was done from the command line without
a windowing system [shock horror]
This was my first experience of Linux. Getting an xwindows system was a battle between me and the SIS graphic chip. Very briefly I won . . .
more details:
http://peace.wikicities.com/wiki/HolyGeek_Linux_Report
_________________ Puppy WIKI
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Guest
Guest
|
Posted: Wed 27 Jul 2005, 23:36 Post subject:
|
|
Ooops...forgot I'm running my XFree version of Puppy-1.0.3....maybe someone running a standard version of 1.0.4 might be able to elaborate...
But yeah you're right it doesn't let you back to your xsession.......I'll say it may have something to do with the kdrive xserver
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Bancobusto

Joined: 13 Jun 2005 Posts: 168 Location: Vancouver Island
|
Posted: Wed 27 Jul 2005, 23:47 Post subject:
|
|
Lobster, so many questions, not enough time!
Thanks for the link..... have it boookmarked for further perusing......
Welll, it's not that big a deal... but it's worked in Debian, Arch, and Vector without having to typr xwin or startx.. ability to move from one VM to another without hassle is what iwas assuming, no big prob...
Thanks all......
Cheers
_________________ Freedom isn't just a Puppy-Linux forum member!
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Guest
Guest
|
Posted: Wed 27 Jul 2005, 23:54 Post subject:
|
|
| Quote: | but when you go to the full screen terminal
you close down the X-windows system |
Nope that's not correct, there definitely is a prob switching consoles with the kdrive xserver...Come to think of it I remeber that behaviour a while ago but did not think it was worth commenting on.
Other xservers have no problems switching from an xsession to a console and back again.....ctrl-alt-backspace will kill an xserver but ctrl-alt-fx should not.
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Bancobusto

Joined: 13 Jun 2005 Posts: 168 Location: Vancouver Island
|
Posted: Wed 27 Jul 2005, 23:59 Post subject:
|
|
I thought so too.... Not that big a deal, i guess, at least at this point.....
_________________ Freedom isn't just a Puppy-Linux forum member!
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Lobster
Official Crustacean

Joined: 04 May 2005 Posts: 15109 Location: Paradox Realm
|
Posted: Thu 28 Jul 2005, 00:21 Post subject:
|
|
Pah!
Despite all my best efforts I still do not know what I am on about . . .
thanks guys - seemed to remember that Knoppix (or Debian as it becomes when installing to HD) could jump between xwin and root terminal (or whatever it is called)
Could this problem be solvable once we move over to bash fully or am I still making up my own stories?
back to the basics . . .
http://focus.aps.org/story/v9/st33
_________________ Puppy WIKI
Last edited by Lobster on Thu 28 Jul 2005, 02:46; edited 1 time in total
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Guest
Guest
|
Posted: Thu 28 Jul 2005, 00:25 Post subject:
|
|
ditch the kdrive xserver....have a min install of XFree86 or XOrg just to support vesa then have extra modules as dotpups...eg i810 i815....beauty of that too is that you will be able to connect to remote X desktops as well.....
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Bancobusto

Joined: 13 Jun 2005 Posts: 168 Location: Vancouver Island
|
Posted: Thu 28 Jul 2005, 00:32 Post subject:
|
|
hmmmmm.....
although it doesn't seem to have much of an impact with yer everyday user...
don't know how important this really is in the scheme of things,,,,
(shut-up banco, yer above yer head...)
_________________ Freedom isn't just a Puppy-Linux forum member!
Last edited by Bancobusto on Fri 29 Jul 2005, 01:21; edited 1 time in total
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Flash
Official Dog Handler

Joined: 04 May 2005 Posts: 9844 Location: Arizona USA
|
Posted: Fri 29 Jul 2005, 01:14 Post subject:
|
|
| bladehunter wrote: | | ditch the kdrive xserver....have a min install of XFree86 or XOrg just to support vesa then have extra modules as dotpups...eg i810 i815....<snip> | Wouldn't that get you away from the 'Puppy just works' philosophy? Or might it be possible to have some sort of wizard run as part of the installation process, which would automagically download the right dotpups for whatever hardware it saw? How would that work for the live-CD version of Puppy? After all, to me the live CD is the main attraction of Puppy. It's all I use. I haven't installed Puppy to my hard drive, although I do have a large pup001 file on my hd. Upgrading to the newest version of Puppy is as easy as burning the new iso and booting it.
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Guest
Guest
|
Posted: Fri 29 Jul 2005, 02:18 Post subject:
|
|
| Quote: | bladehunter wrote:
ditch the kdrive xserver....have a min install of XFree86 or XOrg just to support vesa then have extra modules as dotpups...eg i810 i815....<snip>
Wouldn't that get you away from the 'Puppy just works' philosophy? Or might it be possible to have some sort of wizard run as part of the installation process, which would automagically download the right dotpups for whatever hardware it saw? How would that work for the live-CD version of Puppy? After all, to me the live CD is the main attraction of Puppy. It's all I use. I haven't installed Puppy to my hard drive, although I do have a large pup001 file on my hd. Upgrading to the newest version of Puppy is as easy as burning the new iso and booting it. |
Well considering kdrive doesn't support i810 or i815 above 800x600 it's just about the same except more easily extended....At the moment I'm running a modded version of 1.0.4 where I deleted ALL of the original X stuff, just leaving the fonts and installed XFree86 by hand...(with just vesa,i810 and neomaigc drivers) usr_cram.fs is up by about 8meg and I've allowed 16MB for the initrd...but I was able to get up to 1600x1200 on the machine I have the i810 gfx chip on.......I've had it all the time but it was doing duties as a router\firewall\access point...tho now I'm looking at trying to reduce the usr_cram.fs by striping some binaries
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
|